Currently reading: Autocar re-invents the Routemaster
We've redesigned one of London's icons of overground transport; read about it here

Autocar, in collaboration with Capoco Design, has redesigned London's Routemaster bus for the 21st century.

So positive has been the reaction to Associate editor Hilton Holloway's piece that we've decided to reproduce it in full below, so that all and sundry can read what all the fuss is about. We think this proposal, for a hydrogen-powered Routemaster capable of carrying up to 76 passengers, makes much more sense that London's fleet of loathed and problematic bendy-busses.

UPDATE: Read Autocar's road test of the New Bus for London

Return of the Routemaster

Although I grew up in the Britain’s premier bus town, I was never a fan of this uniquely lumbering form of transport. Aged 11, I had no choice but to take the local Fishwick bus to the secondary school – a single decker Leyland National if my memory serves – and cough up 11p each way.

Once I graduated to local sixth form, the local authority gave me the option of either a bus or rail pass. No contest. Let the train take the strain. Five minutes, non-stop to Preston. The same bus journey would have been a neck-snapping 45-minute drag.

It wasn’t until I shipped up in London 10 years later, that I found myself standing at the bus stop again. As a lowly junior news reporter, driving shiny new press cars was out of the question. So it was the No 137 Routemaster for me, the original Clapham omnibus. Queenstown Road Battersea to Sloane Square tube station in Chelsea.

By then, I also had six years studying product design under my belt, so was well placed to appreciate the superbly thought-out Routemaster design. It was designed specifically for use in London and took into account the unique nature of the capital’s roads.

It was light (based around an aluminium space frame), narrow, fuel efficient (more so than today’s buses), relatively agile and – most importantly – allowed passengers to jump on and off whenever it was at a standstill. And sometimes when it wasn’t…

This last feature wasn’t unique - Leyland buses of 1920s vintage had rear platforms – but it did mean that it was ideal for London travel, where quick changes between bus routes, tubes and even taxis, is often the norm.

Sure, the Routemaster was a bit cramped. Pushchairs needed to be folded and it was a no-go for wheelchairs, but it did serve 95 percent of the commuting public better than any bus ever seen in the capital.

The detailing was a delight. Not just the post-war aluminium aesthetic (it looked a little like it had been built using parts from a scrapped Lancaster bomber), but also the superb interior. The hardwood decked floors, beautiful wind-down windows activated by beautifully engineered handles.

Some versions had bare lightbulbs mounted above the windows. At night there was nothing to touch the subdued ambience of a Routemaster. (What a contrast to sitting in a brash modern bus under the harsh strip lights).

Back to top

The Routemaster’s open back kept the interior cool in the summer and stopped it getting stuffy in the winter. And the conductor was an ever-reassuring presence.So what was not to like? Even Ken Livingstone, London’s first modern-era Mayor, said that ‘only a de-humanised moron would get rid of the Routemaster’. So guess who decided to dump the Routemaster just weeks after winning a second election in 2004 and without mentioning it in his manifesto?

The last Routemaster – a 159 - was consigned to history in December 2005, some 44 years after the first. Although today, two ‘heritage’ Routemaster buses still ply a short route in central London to please the tourists.

Livingstone claimed EU disabled access regulations demanded the cull. When that turned out to be a lie (the cut-off date is actually 2017) it was claimed that Transport for London - know as Transport for Lefties by weary London commuters - that Routemasters were just ‘too small’.

Replacement of the Routemaster with generic double deckers and the hated – by everyone from passengers to cyclists - Bendy Bus has made surface public transport even more depressingly uniform and Stalinist than it needs to be.

So what has this got to do with Autocar? Well, we all appreciate good product design. How could we not, in this job? Everyday we see the huge design and engineering effort that goes into building a modern motor.

We’re also not immune to public transport – especially based on the edge of the capital - but we’re also well aware that the standard of design could be much, much higher than it is.

So, during one late stint in the office editor-in-chief Cropley wondered out loud from the background chat ‘why not propose a design for a new Routemaster?’A ground-up re-think of the bus, which meets modern regulations, is whisperingly eco-friendly but also delivers old-world style and convenience. Call it corporate responsibility; call it Autocar’s positive contribution to improving public transport. But also call it huge fun to bring to life.

When new product proposals are called for, most heads turn my way. And by an extraordinary coincidence, I happened to have on my desk the card of a man I’d met a few years ago at the Royal College of Art graduation show. Alan Ponsford knew in an instant what needed to be done. And this is the result. The Routemaster Olympian.

Back to top

Autocar's Routemaster RMXL in detail

Capoco’s Routemaster design, dubbed RMXL, is 9840mm long, that’s 800mm longer than the old model. The 6540mm wheelbase is just over 700mm longer and the width up 162mm to 2550mm. Although the new Routemaster’s roof is 275mm lower, the lost interior space is easily recovered because the floor is also much lower.RMXL will carry 48 people on the upper deck — eight more than the original — but will accommodate four fewer passengers downstairs because space has repurposed for wheelchairs and pushchairs.

At 8230kg, it will weigh around 400kg more than the old version — a tribute to the original aluminium spaceframe design.

The RMXL is also built around a massive spaceframe of aluminium extrusions. Normal buses are built around a welded steel frame, but this aluminium cage should be lighter and much stiffer.

The skin of the bus is made from rolled aluminium panels, and the floors are made from bonded honeycomb sandwich sheets, the same material used by modern passenger jets.

The frame and floors will be fixed together mechanically, but the windows will be bonded in place. The engine and air suspension are mounted on stainless steel subframes.

The key difference between this Routemaster and the old model lies in the transmission. The engine is still in the nose, but there’s no mechanical connection between the engine and the rear wheels. Instead the engine powers a generator that charges the batteries, which drive the electric motors on each rear wheel.The removal of the huge gearbox, propshaft and rear differential vastly increases the ground floor space. The RMXL’s floor is flat and sits below the centre line of the wheels.

This improves passenger access, for pedestrians and those with wheelchairs and buggies. The air suspension will also lower the bus so that the floor is level with the kerb. 

Looked at objectively, one of the most environmentally-unfriendly ways of providing public transport has to be strapping a large diesel engine into a heavy vehicle and then stopping and starting it between five and seven times per mile. The result is that buses can be very ‘dirty’.

Back to top

While CO2 has become synonymous with ‘pollution’, it‘s Nitrogen Oxides and particulates from inner-cirty diesels that affect human health. Although particulate traps can help, high exhaust temperatures are required to completely burn the soot away, something that can’t be achieved in stop-start traffic. Reducing NoX requires complex in-vehicle treatment, such as the systems used by Mercedes’ Bluetec diesel engines.

Many global cities (including Tokyo, Hong Kong and Delhi) have already addressed this problem by shifting to buses and taxis powered by clean-burning liquid petroleum gas, or compressed natural gas.

However, the next step is to use a hybrid transmission. The RMXL design uses a Ford 2.3-litre ‘hydrogenised’ petrol engine, developing 127bhp. (Boeing is using this engine in a pilotless drone aircraft). Hydrogen fuel is stored in an filament-wound tank, mounted under the staircase.

The engine is designed to run continuously at an optimum speed, driving a 97Kw generator. This charges the Lithium Ion batteries, which are mounted in front of the rear axle. The batteries drive the electric motors on the rear axle.

At a stroke, problems with pavement-side pollution are eliminated and the bus will run quietly – noise pollution is another major problem with heavy buses – and with zero local pollution. A fuel cell stack could be used in place of the engine, but would cost many hundreds of thousands extra.

A simpler, more near-term, solution would be to use a Californian-spec diesel engine running on second-generation bio-diesel. Large-scale storage hydrogen in city and town centre bus stations might not prove popular with local residents. Bio-diesel storage would prove less controversial.

Interestingly, Alan Ponsford points out that there will never be a large plug-in hybrid bus fleet. Typically a bus needs to be cleaned and re-fuelled in three minutes. Re-fuelling with liquid energy is very rapid and efficient. By contrast, if you had to re-charge London’s 8000-strong bus fleet overnight, it might require 20 medium-size power stations running for five hours, to manage it.

Back to top

Ponsford reckons that the RMXL might be viable with a 500 per year production run over nine years. This design would also have very long service life – perhaps 20 years compared to a typical 10.

Export potential would be significant and it would also be possible to build a version with full or half-height rear doors for markets outside London.

With the government putting pressure on local authorities to use ‘demand management’ (road tolls) to encourage ‘behavioural change’ (force local drivers onto public transport), perhaps we should demand a vehicle that is as advanced, clean and functional as the cars they would like us to leave at home. Like the RMXL.

... and who's behind it?

Alan Ponsford founded Capoco Design in 1977 to specialise in bus and coach design, after working at Leyland Truck and Bus in Lancashire.

Capoco has designed some of the best-selling city buses in the UK, including the Dennis Dart and Trident, the Plaxton Pointer and the Optare Solo. It has also been involved in 20 different projects in North America, China, Hong Kong, Singapore, 17 countries in Africa and in South America.

Join the debate

Add a comment…
DesignLondon 18 July 2008

Re: Autocar re-invents the Routemaster

Good idea! The Routemaster is a design icon that London is known for all over the world. Capoco Design has done a good job with a classic design/form language combined with new technology.

Remember the square boxy London taxis? Nobody wanted them! - just as (Ken's) bendy busses. Perhaps some details can discussed in the proposed design, but the direction is definitely right in my opinion.

Indeed a "completely" new modern design might work also - but it could also end up as something that just doesn't feel right. Trends do change. A "modern" design of today might not be a pride in 15..20 years. A retro design is therefore more likely to withstand changes in trends and design language. Unless, someone manages to make new design icon with a timeless modern look.. It's not easy, but both new Jaguars and Aston Martins (in particular!) show design icons can still be created in UK.

Great that Boris has given the idea his backing.

Someone suggested trolley busses - just keep in mind it might be quite costly to place the wires along the routes - and the wires would not be a visually pleasing solution.
It is easier to build new buses that can be placed in on any old or new route than creating a trolley infrastructure - and we do not want to pay for another MetroNet do we? ; )

Alan Ponsford has done a good job. Ok, perhaps refinement of some of the details and Londoners could be proud of the tfl buses again!

When Boris, allow motorcycles and scooters in the bus lanes with new Routemasters London will be a nicer place.

ianandroel 29 December 2007

Re: Autocar re-invents the Routemaster

49er Dweet 25 December 2007

Re: Autocar re-invents the Routemaster

michael knight wrote:

There must be a way of keeping the signature light/grill combination but moving the game on stylistically.

I agree with Michael Knight. The “bulbous” nose needs to go while somehow the iconic look retained. More work, but well worth it.

Interesting thinking re: the drive train process. “Silent running” deep in the heart of an urban area opens up all sorts of environmental enhancement options.

Operationally, though, in order to be commercially successful (thus useful) the design needs tweaking, imho. The current one-way traffic flow in one door and out the other of the Dennis Enviros, et al, generally allows faster loading/unloading. This is a tremendous benefit, and the design offered throws that advantage away.

My suggestion (though admittedly costly) would be a curb-side (OK, kerb) front door, second stairwell (behind the driver) and an Oyster-card reader with CCTV oversight at the rear-door. Use pattern would be front loading, rear exiting, with rear-loading permitted once that platform cleared. Rear-boarders would scan their own cards. Misreads or skips could be asked by a generic message over the PA to “re-scan” at alternate reader stations while the coach was still in motion, saving time and hurt feelings. {Can anybody say, “Man the gap!)”?

Not said critically, but culturally UK transport operations are not as up-to-speed as North American vis-a-vis disabled passengers. Sorry, guys, but I've been there and suffered through it first hand. With that view in mind, I think two designated wheelchair stations is great, but there's no reason those same stations (and maybe two more to accommodate probable cultural changes over the next decades) shouldn't be made convertible (by using a similar appearing but easily foldable against the wall seat assembly) so as to not lose seating capacity from the additional stairwell. This style has been available overseas for almost three decades.

I've operated transit systems in Yosemite Valley and Pebble Beach, and can see the international appeal of this proposal to many urban area transit authorities. The design process should also allow for left-hand drive “flip-flopping” of the coach body during manufacture to facilitate it's commercial acceptance world-wide. If done properly, and when they set their mind to it Londoners are quite capable of “doing things up right”, the RXML could be the next iconic image Brits use to their advantage for another half century or so. Cheers from the Monterey Bay.