Currently reading: Hybrids exempt from Britain's petrol and diesel car ban
Government unveils £2.7bn plan to tackle air pollution; older vehicles may eventually be allowed

Only electrified cars and vans will be sold from new in the UK from 2040, the government has announced in a paper published by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).

The move is part of a £2.7bn blueprint for tackling air pollution, and is consistent with the Government’s election manifesto. The ban won't affect cars with hybrid and plug-in hybrid drivetrains, but rather "conventional petrol and diesel cars".

The paper also mentions further possible exemptions for combustion engine cars, once air quality levels improve to a satisfactory point. It says "Local authorities should bear in mind such access restrictions would only be necessary for a limited period and should be lifted once legal compliance is achieved and there is no risk of legal limits being breached again".

A targeted scrappage scheme for older diesel vehicles is also being considered, but it won't be ratified until after a consultation period.

What are the best electric cars on sale today? Read Autocar's verdicts here

In 2017 around 4% of all new car sales have been plug-in hybrids or fully electric, with around a quarter of that figure sales of fully electric cars. Current predictions by charging point firm Chargemaster suggest that the first one million plug-in hybrid or electric car will be on the road by 2022, by which point electrified car sales will account for around 10% of all new car sales. There are around 40m cars on UK roads today.

Society of Motor Manufacturers & Traders CEO Mike Hawes cautioned that the automotive sector could be 'undermined' if the industry was not given enough time to adapt to the new policy.

"Much depends on the cost of these new technologies and how willing consumers are to adopt battery, plug in hybrid and hydrogen cars," said Hawes.

"Currently demand for alternatively-fuelled vehicles is growing but still at a very low level as consumers have concern over affordability, range and charging points.

France pledges to ban petrol and diesel cars by 2040

"Outright bans risk undermining the current market for new cars and our sector which supports over 800,000 jobs across the UK so the industry instead wants a positive approach which gives consumers incentives to purchase these cars."

Additionally, a £255 million fund is expected to be set up to aid councils to clean up the most polluted inner-city areas.

Potential methods of tackling local issues include introducing charging for high-polluting vehicles through to the removal of speed humps and traffic calming measures has also been highlighted as a possible improvement. Money will also be made available to retro-fit pollution-reducing technology to public transport

Back to top

Air pollution is linked to around 40,000 premature deaths a year in the UK. A government spokesman said: "Poor air quality is the biggest environmental risk to public health in the UK and this government is determined to take strong action in the shortest time possible.”

The industry reacts

Several car makers have welcomed today's news, with Hyundai stating that the combustion engine ban aligns with its current plans. A spokesperson told Autocar "Hyundai Motor has already launched the new Ioniq – the world’s first car to offer Hybrid, Plug-In Hybrid and full Electric powertrains all in one bodystyle –which is currently on sale in the UK. To date in 2017, it has sold circa 15,000 Hyundai Ioniq vehicles in Europe and 2500 in the UK.

"It is also a pioneer in zero emission fuel cell technology and it was the first manufacturer to make a fuel cell vehicle commercially available to the UK market back in October 2014.  To date, we have sold 15 cars here in the UK and 500 across Europe. That is more than all other brands offering Fuel Cell combined.  An all-new fuel cell vehicle will be introduced in 2018."

Vincent Tourette, Renault UK boss said: “We’ve been pioneers in electric vehicles and this news has validated that we got it right before anyone else. We will be ready [for any legislation changes] but we will see if customers choose to go to EVs and if they do, we will be able to deliver.”

When asked about what the UK needs to achieve these targets, Tourette said: “There is work to be done on infrastructure, that remains one of the main weaknesses, especially in central London. There also needs to be ongoing tax incentives.”

Nissan UK put out the following statement: “As the pioneer of electric vehicles, and having sold more than any other company in the world, we welcome plans that encourage people to switch to low or zero emission vehicles. In the future, cars will become an intrinsic part of the way we consume, share and generate energy.”

Paul McNamara, technical boss of Williams Advanced Engineering, which is developing the battery for Aston Martin’s forthcoming RapidE, described the announcement as positive, saying that “it drives the industry forward with a very clear date”.  

Back to top

He highlighted challenges including the absence of any cell manufacturers in the UK. “We need to see a transition plan and we will have to work hard to make sure we transition jobs in engine plants to jobs in motor and battery plants. I think the Government has a role to play to encourage the battery industry.”

The SMMT's Hawes added: "What has been announced is consistent with what the industry and legislators have been working towards, so in terms of timing 2040 is not unreasonable.

"But putting a firm deadline on it does mean we are betting on the battery technology developing, the infrastructure being there and being robust to heavy use and that the consumer actually wants it. Today, electric cars are more expensive and compromised in some ways compared to combustion engines cars."

"We would have preferred a target to hit and the ways to hit it being left to industry to work out, but the industry has a history of meeting targets and when we know more detail we work towards them."

Join the debate

Add a comment…
Chris C 27 July 2017


A lot could happen in 23 years - can the government accurately predict what battery technology will be in use by then, eg graphene/aluminium - by then lithium ion could be as obsolete as lead acid and molten sulphur EV's.. .

I suspect that very mild bolt on hybrid technology could be an easy workaround, possibly even LPG. A lot more needs to come out about the relative benefits of petrol and diesel and air pollution caused by other sources.

Presumably British car makers will continue to make petrol/diesel vehicles for World markets where electrical legislation and infrastructure is less prevalent by 2040.

Bazzer 27 July 2017

Governments held accountable

Where do you stop with that?  Look at climate change taxes.  The money raised doesn't do ANYTHING other than go to general causes like defence, education, and the NHS.  That's why the idea of climate change is promoted so strongly by every government minister.  The funny thing is, they now cannot do without those taxes!  If man-made climate change was proved wrong tomorrow, we'd all still be paying climate taxes 23 years from now.

dipdaddy 27 July 2017

I think the issue is a bigger

I think the issue is a bigger one than that and I try to look at it from a chain of profits perspective. I remember a firm in the US who designed a power cube which was a kind of fuel cell and stackable to make up the power you wanted. he could have easily sold that on the domestic market but that would kill off the energy giants in the US so he was only allowed to sell to commercial firms to power buildings and data centres.

investment funds of all sorts contain a lot of shares of the large oil and gas firms. Although it pennies they make but stuff they sell by the lorry load is huge profits. banning combustion engines now or in the next 5 years will mean their accounts will take a huge hit and in turn the funds that contain their shares will take a huge hit as well. this 2040 ban seems to give these firms time to adjust and look into alternative investments or income revenues to offset the drop in fuel sales whilst in the meantime this gives green tech firms to rachet up the investment to get the technology out.

The other issue I can't understand is when diesels were promoted big time by the government didn't any scientists at the time think there are other gases that come out of the exhuast and how harmful they might be. I can't imagine a group of scientists didn't see this coming. surely someone forecasted the rise in diesel sales and the knock on effect it will have. it all just smells a bit corporate to me. Now they say diesels are more harmful. the consumer can't be held responisble for this, the government should be held accountable for encouraging this rise in diesel sales as well as other industrial representative bodies.