From £29,310
Entry-level engine doesn't necessarily offer the best value in the range

Our Verdict

The Mercedes C-class coupé is a strong contender with a character of its own

Join the debate


1 June 2011

It's supposed to replace the CLC but it's almost 50% more expensive yet doesn't have a hatchback. Cynical or what?

1 June 2011

[quote blowerbentley]It's supposed to replace the CLC but it's almost 50% more expensive yet doesn't have a hatchback. Cynical or what[/quote]

You are spot on, you could have had a 3.5 V6 in the C class sport coupe for significantly less than this thing costs. I think its a real shame Mercedes didnt decide to replace the old car properly at the same price point, with a RWD car.

Having said that, this is so much more appealing than the E Class coupe. Bizare that the cheaper the Mercedes coupe, the better looking it is.


1 June 2011

Sounds like a dreadfully slow and uninspiring way to spend 30k to me - baffles me why anyone would spend so much on something that is designed to look fast but plainly isn't. Something rather sad about underpowered premium cars... smacks of desperation.

And I notice the test car is LHD - let's see where the pedals are on the RHD version shall we? Most likely annoyingly offset as per the saloon, and again, it baffles me why anyone would spend 30k on a car that imposes an unnatural seating position from the moment they get in to the moment they get out. BMW, Audi and Mercedes are all guilty of this - if they can't be bothered to engineer their cars properly for my side of the road, I can't be bothered to give them my money for one. Simples!

2 June 2011

[quote Autocar]which comes with a 1.8-litre petrol engine serving a relatively modest 154bhp[/quote]

I am sorry but you need to start living in the real world, a 1.8 with 154 bhp, low emission and 140mph top speed, is not modest, a couple of years ago you couldnt get a 2.0 with those figures. It may not be a fire breathing monster, but its not a bad engine


2 June 2011

[quote Citytiger]1.8 with 154 bhp, low emission and 140mph top speed, is not modest[/quote]

It also has decent torque an extended rev range and inherent smoothness that the diesel will never match.

Nevertheless I'd expect more go for this money.

2 June 2011

I just made a comment about the Audi R4 and the unlikelihood of it being on sale at the 25k target price. Given that this is over 30k then I am pretty sure that I will be right!

2 June 2011

[quote blowerbentley]It's supposed to replace the CLC but it's almost 50% more expensive yet doesn't have a hatchback. Cynical or what?[/quote]

With the new A-Class appearing to be more of an Audi A3 / BMW 1-series rival, I guess the 3-door version of that replaces the cheaper versions of the CLC.

Still expected the entry level C-Class coupe to be less than £30k though - you could get a Jag XF 2.2d for the same money which feels like a lot more car.

2 June 2011

Mercedes suggest this car is to replace the CLC and is designed to get younger buyer in to the show room?

Why bother Merc?

At the end of the day if a younger buyer wants a Mercedes then they will go and buy a second hand car.

The whole strategy is at odds with Mercedes character as a company. Why devalue your product to appeal to a younger audience when you have a perfectly good second hand car scheme? It's not as if the residuals are that special any more.

As for the car itself, it's nice enough but as other have said there are far better ways to spend £30,000, even if you HAVE to have a Merc.



It's all about the twisties........

2 June 2011

taking into account the stories suggestion to spend a couple more grand for the 220 diesel - I'd agree to scrub that and go for the new XF Jag diesel - slightly less money much better performance and as was said previously, a hell of a lot more car for the money.

2 June 2011

"Something rather sad about underpowered premium cars... smacks of desperation."

Only on a car review website populated by 20 - 40 yr old men will you find comments like this. Somebody who spends 30k + on a car is by no means desperate, whatever engine they choose. Not everybody feels the need to compete on the roads, sorry lads. In fact it could be just as easily argued that unnecessarily overpowered cars... "smacks of desperation".

For many many people - those who aren't so worried about their ability to burn people off at the lights, or on the autobahn, or in the outside line of the M4, this engine will be 100% enough.


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • First Drive
    22 December 2014
    Entry-level diesel MPV shares its three-cylinder engine with Mini but, due to long gearing, lacks the authoritative punch of a convincing premium product
  • Car review
    17 December 2014
    The replacement for the CL grand tourer has some big boots to fill
  • Mercedes-Benz CLS 350 AMG Line Shooting Brake review
    First Drive
    16 December 2014
    Elegant, alluring and with some welcome improvements, but not good enough to lead the class
  • First Drive
    15 December 2014
    Hushed, flexible and remarkable value for money. Arguably more fit-for-purpose than any other ‘S’.
  • 2015 Mazda CX-3 review
    First Drive
    12 December 2014
    The Mazda CX-3 has style and substance, and deserves consideration for anyone wanting a compact urban SUV. Here’s hoping Mazda gets the price and equipment right