Mark Tisshaw
17 October 2012

What is it?

A pretty hard car to think of a rival to. Put simply, it's a new all-wheel-drive version of our current favourite city car, the Panda. But the Panda 4x4 is unique in a number of ways, chiefly that it's the only car in its segment that can offer four-wheel drive — and it has an off-road pedigree that makes it more SUV than city car.

Visually, the Panda 4x4 is differentiated from the Panda Lounge on which it is based by its chunky body cladding, special 15in alloys, a ride height raised by 47mm and an air intake raised by 700mm. But the changes run much deeper under the skin, and a quick glance at the spec sheet reveals it to be more Land Rover than Panda.

The permanent all-wheel-drive transmission is called 'Torque on Demand'; this fully automatic system features two differentials and an electronically controlled coupling. It sends traction to the front wheels, rear wheels or a combination of both depending on road and grip conditions.

The Panda 4x4 also gets an electronic-locking differential to work with the electronic stability control system below 31mph, proper mud and snow tyres and a shorter first gear for the manual gearbox on the TwinAir version. A new six-speed manual also makes its debut on the Panda 4x4.

To best illustrate that the Panda 4x4 is a car with more in common with small crossover SUVs than city cars it's worth looking at its key off-road stats: the approach, breakover and departure angles are all greater than those on the Mini Countryman and even the Nissan Qashqai.

What is it like?

One of the most complete, characterful and capable city cars we can remember driving. We liked the old Panda 4x4, but is was just too unrefined on the road to be considered usable everyday. But the new one changes all that.

The most striking initial reaction behind the wheel is just how high you sit and how commanding your view of the road is in the Panda 4x4. And when you get going you feel how nicely weighted the steering is, how slick the six-speed manual gearbox is, how willing the 84bhp 0.9-litre TwinAir engine is to be revved, but how quiet it can also be when at motorway speeds — thanks to the sixth forward gear.

The ride quality is a real stand-out feature. It's soft but never wallows, the extra suspension travel absorbing even the most scarred of road surfaces in a relaxed manner. It handles keenly enough, but rather larger amounts of body roll discourage you from driving it like an Italian hire car.

The Panda 4x4 will also be offered with a 74bhp 1.3-litre MultiJet diesel engine from launch. This oil-burning engine feels strong and workmanlike, but it's only available with a five-speed manual gearbox and a top ratio that's quite short makes it quite noisy above 70mph. Of the two engines, the TwinAir is the one to go for; it'll be around £1000 cheaper and has bags more character. It's a natural fit for the Panda 4x4 then.

If the Panda 4x4 is impressive on-road, its performance is even better off-road. We tested it on the off-road proving ground at Fiat Group's famous Balocco compound. Here it handled ascents and descents, low-grip surfaces and obstacles that looked impassable for a car the size of the Panda 4x4. And it did so with as much competence as we remember from testing a Jeep Grand Cherokee over the same course.

Should I buy one?

Yes. The Panda 4x4 is a lot of things; it's the most unique city car out there and arguably now the best and most capable of them all. Indeed, there are cars in classes two higher that the Panda 4x4 could make a case against.

It's got true off-road performance and, crucially, is as good if not better than the standard Panda on-road thanks to the improved suspension and commanding driving position. At an estimated £14,000, it's not cheap next to traditional city cars, but the standard equipment list is extensive and its all-round abilities actually make it seem a real bargain. The people's Land Rover Discovery seems like quite an apt description for it.

Fiat Panda 4x4 TwinAir

Price £14,000 (est); 0-62mph 11.5sec; Top speed 105mph; Economy 61.4mpg; CO2 105g/km; Engine 2 cyls, 875cc, turbocharged petrol; Power 84bhp at 5500rpm; Torque 107lb ft at 1900rpm; Gearbox six-speed manual

Join the debate


Looks like an interesting little car

2 years 5 weeks ago

Good Job Fiat!

First the Clio....

2 years 5 weeks ago

.... and now the Panda.

This is the second car in a week that has been considered better as a petrol than it is a diesel.

Looks like a cracking little car and further goes to prove that the Panda is a better buy than it's 500 sibiling.



It's all about the twisties........

Clio or Sandero?

2 years 5 weeks ago

I was rather impressed by the Sandero this week!

Shame the TwinAir drinks like

2 years 5 weeks ago

Shame the TwinAir drinks like Oliver Reed on a stag night.

Uneven review

2 years 5 weeks ago

You say "it's the most unique city car out there and arguably now the best and most capable of them all", but surely other cars w/o a raised ride height and a heavy, efficiency-sapping 4x4 system are quicker/lighter/more fuel-sipping/offer a better ride-handling tradeoff. I agree it's a very charming car, but objectively it loses out to decicated city cars, no?


I can't think of that many

2 years 5 weeks ago

I can't think of that many cars on sale today with bags of character but this has, in spades.

Driving a Picasso empties your wallet.


61.4 mpg? Seriously?

2 years 5 weeks ago

I'd be rather surprised if the twin-air tops 40mpg in normal day-to-day driving.

£14,000 does seem steap for a

2 years 5 weeks ago

£14,000 does seem steap for a 4x4 city car, and te diesel will be an extra £1,000?wow. Are Fiat getting greedy, or will there be 35% discounts to be had?

I will be interested to hear what typical mpg it will actually do as well. Small turbo petrols seem to be particularly poor except when doing the EU test.

Why no 95 bhp, 6 speed diesel

2 years 5 weeks ago

Why no 95 bhp, 6 speed diesel version ? Would be better offroad cos of the extra torque and more economical. Why only give us the lower powered diesel ? Strange

I would be more interested in

2 years 5 weeks ago

I would be more interested in the four wheel drive without the extra ride height etc, but otherwise looks like a cracking little number. Just hope the interior looks better in real life.

Please register or login to post a comment.

Our Verdict

A very fine multi-use little car that offers an enticing ownership proposition

Driven this week

  • 2015 Audi RS Q3 review

    2015 Audi RS Q3 review

    First drive
    18 November 2014

    More of an expensive oddity than a range-topping performance SUV, and an ultimately unsatisfying oddity at that

  • 2015 Bentley Mulsanne Speed review

    2015 Bentley Mulsanne Speed review

    First drive
    18 November 2014

    The fastest luxury saloon in the world is also one of the very best

  • 2015 Fiat 500X review

    2015 Fiat 500X review

    First drive
    17 November 2014

    Decent styling, a well-judged interior and good practicality means Fiat's 500X is a worthy entrant on your compact crossover shortlist

  • 2015 Hyundai i20 review

    2015 Hyundai i20 review

    First drive
    17 November 2014

    The new i20 is a very spacious, well-kitted and keenly priced addition to this competitive segment, but it’s let down by weak engines

  • 2014 Porsche 911 Carrera 4 GTS PDK review

    2014 Porsche 911 Carrera 4 GTS PDK review

    First drive
    14 November 2014

    This sporty 911 Carrera plugs the gap between the standard Carrera S and the hardcore GT3 successfully