Can the magic of the new Renault 5 also help spark an electric renaissance for the Nissan Micra?

The car industry has never been scrupulously fair. Very often, something just has to lose out, follow on, or play second fiddle; especially if there’s more money in it that way.

So it is for the latest Nissan Micra. This car makes the switch to a fully electric powertrain for this sixth-generation version, having never been much more than a micro hybrid before now. So the cheap-and-cheerful supermini that everyone's granny drove - or the one so many of us learned to drive in - has taken a decidedly 21st century turn.

Nissan’s claiming that’s something of an audacious move, intended to appeal to the younger clientele that it’s hoping to attract relative to that of the retro-chic Renault.

 

Advertisement

DESIGN & STYLING

Nissan Micra review 2025 002

That 'audacity' idea was met with scepticism by journalists at the car’s European press launch in Rotterdam. Because - as it might seem, at the very least - all the company has done here is to take a Renault 5, modify the headlights, bumper styling and body surfacing a bit, and slap on some Nissan badges. It admits to having done nothing whatsoever to differentiate the Micra from its sister car ‘mechanically’ - which is to say, with its drivetrain, chassis or suspension hardware or tuning. Doesn’t sound very audacious, does it? Rather the opposite.

To a significant extent, though, the derisory status that move would seem to confer on this car is really the net effect of the car's timing, as much as its particular execution. The Renault 5 came along first; so it’s been made to look like the template and donor car - and not by accident, you have to assume.

It’s apparent that Nissan didn’t want this to be retro-style design; but I’m afraid I don’t see much of any old Micra about it at all. The K11 and K12 cars were landmarks of supermini design; something circumstance dictated that this new one simply couldn’t be.

But is it really? The Renault’s business case will have relied upon input, and key investment, from Nissan in sharing big fixed costs up front. So it’s absolutely true for Nissan to argue that the 5 wouldn’t exist, as it does and at the price it does, if the new Micra hadn’t become its sister car. That’s just the way the modern, cooperative car business works; even if thinking about this new Nissan in those terms doesn’t excuse all of its failings.

With compact EVs, especially those made in Europe, cost is critical. Better-differentiating the Micra from the 5 would have required more expensive factory tooling, just for starters. But it’s still a conspicuously similar-looking car.

The Renault’s silhouette and D-pillar especially are unmistakable. Nissan claims the distinctiveness of the Micra’s head- and taillights especially, both intended to reference the popular ‘K12’ Micra of 2002, makes for a certain uniqueness of visual character; but it's highly questionable if there's enough of it. Lots of cars on shared platforms managed to be better designed and -distinguished than this.

 

The biggest visual link between Micras three and six is the round front light design. The design team are also proud of the line running down the body side, which they say looks like it has been made by a gelato scoop. It kind of does, to be fair.

Colour is another differentiator between the 5 and the Micra. The Micra has a more monochrome palette of greys and blacks with a dash of red and blue in the exterior design colour options, rather than the much more vibrant yellows and greens of the 5. 

INTERIOR

Nissan Micra review 2025 011

On the inside, even less distinguishing effort would seem to have been made. The Micra offers different upholsteries and materials than the Renault. We drove an upper-tier Evolve-spec car, which had a fairly convincing pseudo-premium impression of quality about it thanks to its padded leather-effect dashboard trim - though there was plenty of hard, shiny plastic on show also. The car’s use of colour, pattern and textiles around the cabin isn’t as imaginative or inviting as the Renault’s - but it’s smart enough.

For cabin space, you get exactly what you would in 5; so space up front is good by supermini standards, in the back it’s tight but just about passable for smaller adults and kids, and in the boot about average for the class. 

There’s an 'easter egg' graphic of Mount Fuji in the central storage between the seats, and another on the boot trim. They're supposed to show how proud the car is of its Japanese roots, apparently. Hmm.

Renault’s Google-based infotainment system has had a pretty light-touch software reskin, but offers good usability and connectivity options. Meanwhile, the one functional reason you might opt for a Micra instead of a 5 is because, in upper-tier versions at least, the Nissan already comes with ‘regen’ shift paddles as standard; and, on the Renault, they have yet to be added (although Renault has always maintained they would come eventually).

Nissan offers three different interior themes buyers can choose. The base Comfort grade has a different and smaller screen arrangement when compared to the higher trims of Audacious and Chill, which get a pair of 10.3in screens.

Renault offers a similar basic 5, and the recommendation there is to skip it and go higher up the range, as you get so many more features on top; we would say the same for the Micra.

The Chill interior in the Micra has light trim and an airy feel, while the Audacious one doesn’t really feel as it sounds but is still a nice place to be, with a real Japanese look and feel to it. The lines on the dashboard trim are said to mimic those of a raked zen garden, so says Nissan.

ENGINES & PERFORMANCE

Nissan Micra review 2025 022

Have we mentioned yet that the Micra is based on the Renault 5? If the two do diverge at least a little in their design, they don’t in this section.

The car is good to drive. Nippy, compact, refined, supple but well-damped, and a little bit dynamically sophisticated.

There are different driving modes which unlock different amounts of power. Eco saps power to the point of being undrivable. Comfort and Sport give max peak power but with more urgent acceleration in Sport.

Just like on the Renault, all versions come on 18in wheels; all have all-independent suspension; and there’s a choice of 40- and 52kWh NMC drive batteries, with motors of either 121- or 148bhp respectively, connected to the front axle. 

Marginally better aerodynamics give the Micra a better electric range for the 52kWh version: 260 miles versus 252-. On test on Dutch roads, ours promised a real-world 245- on a full battery - but, just like the 5, ate up its reserves quicker than that at motorway speeds, where a range of 180 miles should be about your lot.

Like with many small electric cars, it’s quick off the line but performance tails off at higher speeds, but that’s to be expected and is part of the brief really for a small supermini like this.

The brake pedal can take some adjusting to if you’ve driven other small electric cars, as it’s stiffer and actually feels quite responsive. To that end, brake feel and response are as good as it gets so far from a mainstream EV. 

You can also slow the car down by using the paddles on the steering wheel to adjust the amount of regenerative braking. This cycles through three different settings and there is also a one-pedal mode that can be activated this way, which can bring the car to a complete stop.

RIDE & HANDLING

Nissan Micra review 2025 024

The platform on which the Micra is based is called Amp-R Small, and chassis development for the Micra was left to Renault.

The Micra hasn’t been given its own chassis tune, then; so while it tries to look like a Nissan, you could say that it doesn’t try to drive like one. But then again, Nissan's engineers certainly shouldn’t be disappointed with what has come back from their French colleagues. 

The use of the 5’s platform means that multi-link rear suspension features as standard on the Micra.

Its chassis is agile and quite good fun at urban speeds; contained and well-sorted at faster country-road speeds; with plenty of reassuring heft about the steering, enough stability for motorway driving, and good comfort and isolation throughout. It’s very mature-feeling; very ‘European’.

This is a car that will put a smile on your face and coax you into making you enjoy driving it. Sound familiar? So it should. The Micra's plainly a better drive than most cars in its class; but not quite all.

MPG & RUNNING COSTS

Nissan Micra review 2025 001

The Micra comes in Engage, Advance and Evolve specifications; the middle-tier model being available with either of the two battery packs and motors, and the upper and lower ones either/or.

Like the Renault 5, it does quality for the UK government's £1500 EV grant; and, with it, prices currently start at tempting £21,495 rising to £28,365 for a top-of-the range model.

Half an hour of DC charging will return the battery capacity from 15% to 80%.

Nissan's bosses hinted, during the build up to the Micra's launch, that it would be priced marginally above the Renault 5; but in the end it's almost identical.

One thing that is confirmed as standard is a heat pump, which is important for preserving efficiency and getting the cabin warm on cold days.

VERDICT

Nissan Micra review 2025 028

If very marginally better electric range and some regen paddles are the best reasons to choose a Nissan Micra right now, for this tester they don’t really come close to outweighing the shining reason to buy the Renault 5 instead: because the Renault's a much better-looking car. More elegant; less fussy; dripping with kerbside star quality. Nissan’s efforts at design differentiation here are fussy and half-baked, and can't make up with detailing what is lacking in the car's proportions and outline.

This Nissan Micra certainly makes you realise how much of the Renault’s appeal flows from how it looks. Still, take that design appeal away, and the Nissan Micra - objectively good though it is, with much to recommend it to drive especially - feels like a car that’s missing a superpower.

Matt Saunders

Matt Saunders Autocar
Title: Road test editor

As Autocar’s chief car tester and reviewer, it’s Matt’s job to ensure the quality, objectivity, relevance and rigour of the entirety of Autocar’s reviews output, as well contributing a great many detailed road tests, group tests and drive reviews himself.

Matt has been an Autocar staffer since the autumn of 2003, and has been lucky enough to work alongside some of the magazine’s best-known writers and contributors over that time. He served as staff writer, features editor, assistant editor and digital editor, before joining the road test desk in 2011.

Since then he’s driven, measured, lap-timed, figured, and reported on cars as varied as the Bugatti Veyron, Rolls-Royce PhantomTesla RoadsterAriel Hipercar, Tata Nano, McLaren SennaRenault Twizy and Toyota Mirai. Among his wider personal highlights of the job have been covering Sebastien Loeb’s record-breaking run at Pikes Peak in 2013; doing 190mph on derestricted German autobahn in a Brabus Rocket; and driving McLaren’s legendary ‘XP5’ F1 prototype. His own car is a trusty Mazda CX-5.

Mark Tisshaw

mark-tisshaw-autocar
Title: Editor

Mark is a journalist with more than a decade of top-level experience in the automotive industry. He first joined Autocar in 2009, having previously worked in local newspapers. He has held several roles at Autocar, including news editor, deputy editor, digital editor and his current position of editor, one he has held since 2017.

From this position he oversees all of Autocar’s content across the print magazine, autocar.co.uk website, social media, video, and podcast channels, as well as our recent launch, Autocar Business. Mark regularly interviews the very top global executives in the automotive industry, telling their stories and holding them to account, meeting them at shows and events around the world.

Mark is a Car of the Year juror, a prestigious annual award that Autocar is one of the main sponsors of. He has made media appearances on the likes of the BBC, and contributed to titles including What Car?Move Electric and Pistonheads, and has written a column for The Sun.