From £31,38510
It's finally here: after a long, long wait, we've driven the all-new 345bhp four-wheel-drive Ford Focus RS on UK soil; it is a masterclass

Our Verdict

Ford Focus RS

Is Ford’s new AWD mega-hatch Focus RS as special as we first thought? And can it beat off stiff competition from the Volkswagen Golf R and Mercedes-AMG A45?

  • First Drive

    Ford Focus RS Edition 2017 review

    New option pack adds front limited slip differential to the already stellar Ford Focus RS, but does it increase the fun?
  • First Drive

    2017 Ford Focus RS Mountune FPM375

    Does an official Mountune upgrade of 25bhp and 30lb ft, improve the already rampant and rather magnificent Ford Focus RS?

What is it?

One of the great things about being a kid is that level of hyper-excitement about pretty much anything. Everything’s new, amazing and fantastical. Then you get older, jaded, and full of seen-it-all-before complacence, and if you’re not a little bit mindful of the fact, life starts to seem a bit boring.

It isn’t of course. There’s wonderment all around, particularly at this time of the year: newborn lambs a jumping, lemon-yellow daffodils a blooming, and a new Ford Focus RS with the potential to spank the bejesus out of every hot hatch on sale today. I’ve been itching for this moment like a two-year old taking his first foray on the top deck of a bus, which creates a problem: expectation. “Oh crumbs, what if the reality doesn’t match the dream?”

On paper it’s absolutely dreamy. Grounded on the already fine Focus chassis and worked on by Ford Performance, it’s got the Mustang’s 2.3-litre motor that’ll rev to 6800rpm and spit out 345bhp to all four wheels.

If four-wheel drive makes you yawn and think of dreary understeer, don’t panic; the Focus RS has that covered. Two electronically controlled clutches at the back can switch up to 70% of the torque rearwards and up to 100% from side to side in as little as 0.06sec. And there’s a Drift Mode that locks it into a permanently playful oversteery setup.

You also get launch control, Brembo brakes, a shift light and the option of Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tyres. Oh, and I almost forgot, a proper six-speed manual gearbox with three pedals. 

What's it like?

Does it flatter to deceive? Not a bit. Enough journalistic impartiality remains to recognise the overly lofty driving position, but beyond that the optional buckets fitted to our test car felt spot on. The interior doesn’t feel hugely special otherwise, but then it retains the usability of any other Focus.

Start the engine and it produces a subdued burble, and there are other telltales that confirm the RS has been fundamentally changed, as opposed to being an ST with an extra notch of boost.

The clutch feels heavier and sharper, while the gear lever has a meatier, more satisfying shift. This continues to the steering, too, which is beautifully sorted. It’s weightier than standard even in its Normal setting, but not overbearingly so, and it’s lost that annoying self-centering action that rather spoils the lesser versions.

It feels pointier as well, goading you into upping the pace to see what feel and fluency it'll generate. Plenty as it happens, producing a front end that demands a search for S-bends to marvel at the RS’s ability to change direction. That's also helped by the rear axle squirting the power to the outside rear wheel, helping to rotate the car, before delivering superb all-wheel traction as you fire it off the apex.

There's some roll, but not enough to mar its litheness on switchbacks. The RS has that wonderful firmness of a properly sorted car, and any on-road jitteriness is something you’ll happily accept for the payback of unflappable damping in the face of mid-corner undulations. That's in the suspension's Normal setting, but in Track mode it's too stiff for the road, so that's best left for smooth circuits.

Its brakes are also mighty. Ford reckons they’ll shrug off 30 minutes of circuit driving and up to 13 stops from 135mph before they fade. All I know is they managed several laps of Silvertone’s Stowe circuit with ease, and lack nothing in pedal feel when leant on.

So what about the heart of the Focus RS, the engine? It’s perhaps not blessed with the very last word in character, and the free-flow exhaust produces a slightly contrived sound, but we’re told it is all combustion pulses with no digital enhancement. It starts off as a warble, builds to a moody grumble in the mid-range, and ends up with a raspier rant as the engine climbs towards the limiter. In Sport mode you get some pops and splutters on the overrun, and when launch control’s engaged, sounds WRC-manic from outside.

It pulls well, too. It’s quick by hot-hatch standards, without feeling unusable for the road. The mid-range is potent, but it’s the final surge over the last 1500rpm that you’ll enjoy the most, before the shift light blinks to tell you it’s all change for another gear.

Should I buy one?

Oh heavens above, you must. It’s £31,000 (£1000 more than originally promised), which might be plenty but it’s peanuts next to an AMG A45, and even undercuts the Golf R. Or, if you put down £10,000, what about £180 a month on Ford’s Options finance deal? Give or take you could cover that by sending back your iPhone 6 and replacing your supermarket delicacies with some extra vegetables each month.

And you won’t regret a single moment of predictive texting on your old Nokia 3310 while crunching on another raw carrot. Why? Because an iPhone or Tesco’s Finest bangers and mash can’t tap into your central nervous system and switch on the endorphins the Focus RS can.

That’s why it’s wonderful, exciting, and lives up to its billing. Seriously, it’s everything you’ve dreamt it’ll be, and makes you feel like a ten-year old on Christmas morning again. Priceless.

Ford Focus RS

Location Oxford; On sale now; Price £31,000; Engine 4 cyls, 2261cc, turbocharged, petrol; Power 345bhp at 6000rpm; Torque 325lb ft at 2000-4500rpm (347lb ft on overboost); Gearbox 6-spd manual; Kerb weight 1599kg; 0-62mph 4.7sec; Top speed 165mph; Economy 36.7mpg (combined); CO2/tax band 175g/km, 32%

Join the debate

Comments
33

5 April 2016
It's not bad, then?
who'll be first to complain about the plastics on the dashboard?

5 April 2016
Outoftowner1969 wrote:

It's not bad, then?
who'll be first to complain about the plastics on the dashboard?

ha love it. Car journalists are obsessed with interior plastics, in fact you often hear more about the interior plastics than the oily bits. Blame Audi.

5 April 2016
So it's totally amazeballs... but it's out of your ( 2 days old )50 best cars list?

 

 

5 April 2016
Alas the sad truth is that a 1 litre bluemotion petrol Golf or a Tesla Model 3 is more suited to my natural driving habitat in central london. Anyone know where you can hire one for the weekend?

5 April 2016
winniethewoo wrote:

Alas the sad truth is that a 1 litre bluemotion petrol Golf or a Tesla Model 3 is more suited to my natural driving habitat in central london. Anyone know where you can hire one for the weekend?

No you need a Mustang 5.0L V8.

5 April 2016
Okay I could quite like one & apart from the engine is a better drive than my M135i(the best of all the current hotrods) but no way could I live with the looks - imagine every boy racer for miles around doing stupid things when they see it. If only it looked more ordinary to avoid too much attention.
And why oh why can audi not build a car like this with the 2.5l 5 cylinder RS engine in, now that I would live with for £31k of course !!!!

Curly

5 April 2016
Fine effort by Ford and a lot of performance for the money, but I would've thought the overly lofty driving position/the decidedly average interior/ the jittery ride quality/ the less than charachterful engine etc, would merit at least half a point reduction!

5 April 2016
Especially since the new Boxter reduced Matt Prior to chewing the carpet and pounding the floor with his tiny fists for having the same deficiency.

5 April 2016
I'm sure this is a brilliant car to drive, which is of course the main thing. But am I the only one who thinks the styling is just lazy? Even through that vivid paint, from the side especially it looks like an ST with a cheap body-kit! You can see where the money has been saved, love it or hate it, I think the mk2 RS looked far more meaningful.

5 April 2016
Presumably this car has been passed off after the production component Quality problem experience and consequently delayed deliver by some 2months.
John, did you know about the aforementioned issue and do you know what they were or are you sworn to secrecy?
So good to read your enthusiastic experience, shame no video to support your UK road or track experiences as written.

So what was the UK road experience really like for everyday use, with regards to comfort, as you seem to give it short shrift in your write up.
Family car or not!?

John, good to see that the kid is still in you, when are you buying yours?

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake TDV6
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The handsome Jaguar XF Sportbrake exhibits all the hallmarks that makes the saloon great, and with the silky smooth diesel V6 makes it a compelling choice
  • Volkswagen T-Roc TDI
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    Volkswagen's new compact crossover has the looks, the engineering and the build quality to be a resounding success, but not with this diesel engine
  • BMW M550i
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The all-paw M550i is a fast, effortless mile-muncher, but there's a reason why it won't be sold in the UK
  • Volvo V90
    First Drive
    19 October 2017
    The Volvo V90 is a big estate ploughing its own furrow. We’re about to see if it is refreshing or misguided
  • Kia Stonic
    First Drive
    18 October 2017
    Handsome entrant into the bulging small crossover market has a strong engine and agile handling, but isn’t as comfortable or complete as rivals