8
M division’s first performance X3 delivers emotive straight-six power. How will it fare on UK roads?

Our Verdict

BMW X3 M Competition 2019 review - hero front

Has many of the dynamic hallmarks of BMW’s best M cars, but lacks a bit of effusive performance charm and SUV-typical dynamic versatility

Tom Morgan, deputy digital editor
3 October 2019
BMW X3 M Competition 2019 UK

What is it?

The latest member of BMW’s rapidly expanding performance line-up, which just so happens to be a mid-sized SUV rather than a saloon, coupé or convertible. 

This, the first X3 to ever receive the full M division treatment, gets the adjustable all-wheel-drive system last seen in the M5 super-saloon and an all-new straight-six engine that is also destined for the next-generation M3 in 2020.

If the ‘B58’ motor powering the X3 M40i can be considered M-lite, the M Competition’s ‘S58’ engine is very much the real deal. It’s a near-ground-up redesign, with a forged crankshaft, twin monoscroll turbochargers, indirect intercooler and lightweight cylinder head helping produce a peak 503bhp and 443lb ft - more power and torque than any six-pot yet unleashed by M division. 

Having already experienced the X3 M Competition and its slightly sleeker, slightly pricier X4 M Competition sibling on road and track in New York, we’ve now introduced one to British roads for the first time.

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

What's it like?

Heroically quick, as you’d expect given its substantial power output. The six-cylinder engine note may be less evocative than an AMG V8 or Alfa Romeo’s twin-turbo V6, even with the exhausts set to their loudest, but there’s no denying what the X3 lacks in aural charm it makes up for with startling pace.

More impressive is that power is delivered in such a linear fashion. The twin-turbocharged S58 does an uncanny impression of a naturally aspirated motor, with none of the mid-range shove exhibited by its rivals and usable power right the way through the rev range.

The four-wheel-drive system that was so configurable in the M5 isn’t quite so adjustable here, with no pure rear-wheel-drive mode, but sending power to all four corners lets you hustle the near-two-tonne SUV to 62mph in little over four seconds.

Handling is as precise as you’d expect from a car wearing an M badge, with the kind of grip and body control that lets you drive with real conviction. Steering feels direct at all speeds, and while not as engaging on the limit as the rear-biased Stelvio, it delivers a feeling of agility unexpected of a machine this size and weight.

This level of involvement does come at the cost of everyday ride quality, though, with the adaptively damped suspension delivering a somewhat brittle ride that doesn’t translate brilliantly to UK roads. The X3 rides well over larger bumps and undulations, even in its sportier modes, but high-frequency vibrations transfer easily into the cabin. It is far from the worst in the class for suspension set-ups better suited to a race track than the road, but when even stretches of A-road Tarmac that could feasibly be called ‘good’ feel coarse, the ride might grate when experienced every day.

Set to its most aggressive mode, the eight-speed Steptronic automatic gearbox can rapid-fire between cogs the instant you pull the wheel-mounted paddles. Combined with the rev counter that appears on the head-up display in the racier driving modes, you’re practically encouraged to eke out the entire range between pulls.

Bright red mode buttons flank each paddle for convenient switching between two M Sport driving modes, which can be individually customised should you want to mix the most aggressive throttle response with a more forgiving suspension setting. However, M Sport additions to the steering wheel and centre console aside, there’s little inside the cabin to distinguish the Competition from a vanilla X3.

The quilted seats are sculpted to keep you in place through the corners, but more enveloping over long distances than the Alfa Romeo Stelvio’s carbonfibre-backed buckets. The fully digital dashboard and the latest version of BMW’s iDrive infotainment does challenge for class honours, even if the dials aren’t quite as customisable as Audi’s virtual cockpit set-up.

Should I buy one?

Many likely will, given the growing popularity of performance SUVs, but it is a niche that’s filled with more flamboyant rivals. The X3, by comparison, feels a little sterile.

It certainly isn’t left wanting for pace, but ride and handling exist in a middle ground between the dynamism of Alfa’s Stelvio Quadrifoglio and the everyday refinement of Jaguar’s F-Pace SVR. The soundtrack is also no match for a GLC 63’s snarling V8.

If there can be such a thing as a true driver’s SUV, this is surely it, and those who get behind the wheel will find it delivers an experience that’s largely free from compromise – albeit one that doesn’t entertain in quite the same way as the competition.

BMW X3 M Competition specification

Where Surrey, UK Price £74,470 On sale Now Engine 6 cyls in line, 2993cc, twin-turbocharged, petrol Power 503bhp at 5950-7200rpm Torque 443lb ft at 2600-5950rpm Gearbox 8-spd automatic Kerb weight 1970kg Top speed 155mph (governed) 0-62mph 4.1sec Fuel economy 24.6mpg CO2 263g/km Rivals Porsche Macan Turbo, Mercedes-AMG GLC 63 S

Join the debate

Comments
12

3 October 2019

At least it has lovely round dials, not the hideous instruments in the new 3 series.

oh BMW, what has happened to you?

3 October 2019
If there can be such a thing as a true drivers SUV? I thought the Porsche Macan Was always considered this?

This is probably the only BMW X that I like the styling of.

289

3 October 2019

.... for the daftest name in recent history....'competition'.....as if!

Well it made me laugh anyway.

3 October 2019

That interior layout could be from a 10 year old 3 series, the outside is no better and £75k, and people moan about the price and weight of I-Pace

3 October 2019
xxxx wrote:

That interior layout could be from a 10 year old 3 series, the outside is no better and £75k, and people moan about the price and weight of I-Pace

Agree.  £75k for an X3,  crazy.  The Competition name as well,  what competition will this be entering?  I can see the point on the M3 due to racing, but this?

 

 

3 October 2019
xxxx wrote:

That interior layout could be from a 10 year old 3 series, the outside is no better and £75k, and people moan about the price and weight of I-Pace

If you really believe the new of the new X3 is like a 10 year old 3, then you really haven't got a clue. As for your F-Pace comparison in most respects - dynamics, build, ergonomics, interior, efficiency etc - the X3M is easily the better car. But I guess if you enjoy moaning every time a BMW article is posted , then all the power to you.

3 October 2019
Overdrive wrote:

xxxx wrote:

That interior layout could be from a 10 year old 3 series, the outside is no better and £75k, and people moan about the price and weight of I-Pace

If you really believe the new of the new X3 is like a 10 year old 3, then you really haven't got a clue. As for your F-Pace comparison in most respects - dynamics, build, ergonomics, interior, efficiency etc - the X3M is easily the better car. But I guess if you enjoy moaning every time a BMW article is posted , then all the power to you.

More of a clue than you fanboy. It's my opinion that the looks are dated inside and out, and who said anything about an F-Pace. Looks like you'll have a busy time protecting this £75k BMW relic today from people posting THEIR opinion. 

Oh and build quality, best you don't look at the 2019 JD power dependability results, BMW bottom (below FIAT), perhaps you should moan at them

3 October 2019
xxxx wrote:

Overdrive wrote:

xxxx wrote:

That interior layout could be from a 10 year old 3 series, the outside is no better and £75k, and people moan about the price and weight of I-Pace

If you really believe the new of the new X3 is like a 10 year old 3, then you really haven't got a clue. As for your F-Pace comparison in most respects - dynamics, build, ergonomics, interior, efficiency etc - the X3M is easily the better car. But I guess if you enjoy moaning every time a BMW article is posted , then all the power to you.

More of a clue than you fanboy. It's my opinion that the looks are dated inside and out, and who said anything about an F-Pace. Looks like you'll have a busy time protecting this £75k BMW relic today from people posting THEIR opinion. 

Oh and build quality, best you don't look at the 2019 JD power dependability results, BMW bottom (below FIAT), perhaps you should moan at them

Mr Tesla whorshiper gets het up about fan-boyism. You couldn't make it up. :)

Reliability surveys are dime a dozen and you cherry pick any particular one to suit yourself. For instance this the JD Power (US) for 2019 where it has BMW 7th and Jaguar 26th.

https://www.jdpower.com/business/press-releases/2019-us-vehicle-dependability-studyvds

Regardless, I couldn't give a monkey's about any particular brand and certainly have little time for SUVs in general (X3 included). They are needlessly heavy and high and therefore inefficient and not as good to drive and saloons/hatchbacks/estates. I Just enjoy a little banter, every now and then, with posters who constantly whine about the same things over and over! 

3 October 2019

 Price has nothing to do with it, if your looking for performance in a relatively small package this car fits the bill,and, if your looking at this type of vehicle then you'll have looked at the other brands,and if your coming in at this price level then you can afford the asking price, and ultimately, if you like it inside and out and it performs (like it won't!) to your liking, then who cares what others say?, same old mantra here...your money, your choice......

3 October 2019
Peter Cavellini wrote:

 Price has nothing to do with it, if your looking for performance in a relatively small package this car fits the bill,and, if your looking at this type of vehicle then you'll have looked at the other brands,and if your coming in at this price level then you can afford the asking price, and ultimately, if you like it inside and out and it performs (like it won't!) to your liking, then who cares what others say?, same old mantra here...your money, your choice......

 

Peter,  just because someone can afford to pay for it does not mean it's good value or worth the money.  Otherwise everything is worth the money with that criteria.....

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week