From £56,325
The 750i makes a convincing case in the outside lane of an accommodatingly smooth motorway
Nic Cackett
21 July 2012

What is it?

The mid-life rejig of the fifth-generation BMW 7-series, the firm's initially underwhelming answer to the middling Audi A8 and downright marvelous Mercedes S-class. If the original car was notable for its strict adherence to the once-controversial styling convention laid down by Chris Bangle, the latest model should be considered a veritable chip off the block.

Aside from some LED headlight and grille confetti, nothing has really changed on the saloon’s substantial bodywork. It’s a familiar setting inside, too. BMW’s debonair architecture remains intact, with by far the most significant introduction being the addition of a new 10.25-inch digital instrument cluster that adjusts its information readout to suit the pilot’s choice of drive mode settings.

For fans of design distinction between their variants, inactivity on the design front might seem disappointing, but underneath BMW has busied itself with typical diligence. Along with the now across-the-board fitment of the eight-speed ZF auto, the entire engine lineup gets the type of comprehensive spruce that delivers more power while, conversely, extracting improved economy and emissions.

The 3.0-litre straight-six diesel engine features again in the popular 730d and 740d with 255bhp and 308bhp respectively. The former, by far the best-seller, is now at a 530d rivaling 148g/km, which, along with its 50.4mpg efficiency, make it the segment leader in the frugality stakes. BMW has also seized the opportunity to launch the second generation of the ActiveHybrid7 in the UK, equipped with a 315bhp 3.0-litre six pot and a 54bhp electric motor for an augmented 41.5mpg. On its own, that same engine props up the 7 Series range in the 740i, while at the (much) steeper end it is topped out by the brazen but rarely seen 536bhp 6.0-litre V12 in the 760i.

The 443bhp 4.4-litre V8 aboard the 750i, tested here, is the cherry pick of the petrol lineup. By mating it with the ZF ‘box and exploiting the Valvetronic system’s manipulation of the intake valve (BMW talks proudly of ‘dimming’ rather than shutting down cylinders), the engineers have extracted a 25 per cent improvement in efficiency, including a colossal 67g/km reduction in the previous model’s CO2 emissions.


Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

Back to top

What's it like?

All of the above would be for nought if the most important alteration to the 7-series was a failure. Our biggest gripe with the previous car was its lumpy ride quality — a complaint that BMW has sought to address by making the previously optional self-leveling air suspension at the back standard, and installing new bearings, ball joints, mounts and dampers throughout. 

The effect is not dramatic, but certainly where the previous version would fidget and occasionally fumble minor deflections, the 750i coaxes a more supple response. A better sense of body control (although still not without its flaws) is augmented by the new electric power steering setup, which offers a brawny, Germanic feel to direction changes.

The now-familiar Eco Pro mode has been plumbed into the Driving Experience Control toggle across the 7-series lineup. With 32.8mpg on the 750i’s cards (we managed late 20s) and a virtually indefatigable 479lb ft of express elevator thrust still accessible even through a numbed accelerator pedal, it is a setting well worthy of default use.

Nevertheless, the new digital display behind the wheel is an added incentive to flirt with the car’s changeable nature. In Eco Pro the readout is dominated by a blue energy recuperation dial; in Sport it reverts to a crimson rev counter.

It’s attractive stuff, but is probably better viewed as an off-tone traffic light, as ‘Sport’ remains a theme too far for the 2035kg 750i. Certainly power is not the issue; the revised throttle map makes the V8 jumpy, but there’s no questioning the fluid grace and virtue of the performance distilled by its marble-smooth eight-speeder. Instead it’s the lingering sensation, as before, that the 7-series is too big, bulky and detached to get to grips with. It's a cause not helped by the fleshy body’s vague, occasionally floaty presence at speed and the decision to foist the steering with even more portentous weight, thereby scotching any organic incentive to explore the car’s wider ability.

Should I buy one?

In the outside lane of an accommodatingly smooth motorway, the 750i makes a convincing case. With an ingratiating lever of Maglev style propulsion beneath your right foot, BMW’s superior cabin around you and a better resolved ride below, the model functions with the prerequisite imperiousness necessary to dispatch the Audi A8 in our shortlist.

But away from its dream scenario, it slips. On more challenging roads it feels less approachable and certainly less engaging than the Jaguar XJ, and exhibits none of the Panamera’s loitering intent. More damagingly, on virtually every surface, especially urban ones, it remains short of the autocratic S-class.

That’s particularly bad news for the 7-series because while its gentle improvements and exceptional powertrains ease it into middle age, the big Mercedes is due a limber all-new replacement. Unless its rival somehow manages to push all the wrong buttons, BMW will have a long while to wait before it gets another shot at topping the prestige saloon class.

Back to top

BMW 750i M Sport

Price £71,340; 0-62mph 4.8secs; Top speed 155mph; Economy 32.8mpg; CO2 199g/km; Kerbweight 2035kg; Engine type, cc V8, 4395cc; Installation Front, longitudinal; Power 443bhp; Torque 479lb ft; Gearbox Eight-speed dual-shift auto

Join the debate


22 July 2012

Yet again the Germans have taken the Euro test and passed it with flying colours. 199g/km for a V8 petrol in a car this size is unbelieveable. But does make taxing the thing a lot more palitable.

Yet for all of this it leaves me cold. There isnt anything about this car to appeal, but for the tax fiddle

22 July 2012

This car doesn't seem to have any character to it at all. As Top Gear described the previous 3-Series, it just seems to be "some car". The same goes for the Audi A8. I think the Jaguar XJ oozes appeal, and the S-Class (although not my cup of tea) still manages to show some character. Credit where it's due though, those are some remarkable economy figures.

22 July 2012

Stick a german motor into the XJ and choices diminish


22 July 2012

Ditto the other comments another BMW with a marvelous engine but there is something engaging and emotional missing from the rest. Chauffeur and Heathrow limo wheels, absolutely brutal depreciation for the petrol.

22 July 2012

"..Our biggest gripe with the previous car was its lumpy ride quality ..."


No worse than the decidely firm riding Jag XJ, something which would never be admitted to on Autoacar's pages.

Nevertheless, the latest 7-series, capable as it is, is a missed opportunity. It looks too dull (not helped by a heavy looking rear and groundhog snout) and doesn't quite have the handling sharpness of pervious 7 series generations to challenege as the best luxury saloon.

22 July 2012

Would you not be far better off in a 6 series Grand Coupe?

This now looks even more like a bloated previous generation (Bangle) 5 series. 

22 July 2012

Styling wise I just can't excited, or even vaguely moved, by this car. It looks like BM have nailed the rear-end but the front is not right. The big kidney grilles are just plonked on the front end. Hideous. Makes the old E38 look like a beauty.

Some of this review could do with paraphrasing;

"a virtually indefatigable 479lb ft of express elevator thrust still accessible even through a benumbed accelerator pedal"

...err... it feels heavy? 

22 July 2012

There is no doubt that this, and indeed its German rivals, lack the flair, appeal and desirability of the XJ. However, the only reason the Jag would win any comparison tests against a 7-Series, S-Class or A8 is primarily down to its better handling and steering, not because of its ride, comfort and refinement, virtues which were supposedly more important in the luxury class and areas in which the German trio generally trump the XJ, not to mention better build quality and superior materials, which I can vouch for. Otherwise the S-Class would still be class leader.

Call me cynical, but Autocar moved the goalposts to enable the XJ to be class best and as such neither Merc, Audi or BMW will rule this class again if handling and sportiness continue to be the essential ingredients. Unless the goalposts move again when the next XJ arrives.

22 July 2012

The XJ's been described as 'slightly' hard-riding, or 'a little' too firm.  It's NOT some rock hard bone-shatterer like some people here are trying to imply.  It's still very comfortable, especially on 19" wheels; the reason it's class leader is because it's comfortable AND great fun to drive with an awe-inspiring interior.  And yes, I do know what I'm talking about because my Dad's got one!

The Mercedes S-Class will, I'm sure, be class leader again when the next generation arrives next year, and it'll probably hold onto that crown until the next generation Jaguar XJ arrives a few years after that.  BMW and Audi have not led the pack yet, the luxury car class is not their forte.

22 July 2012

Lanehogger, I agree with what you are saying the XJ takes a different route as an executive car than its German rivals, its a car you want to drive as opposed to being driven in, the Germans take the opposit approach and make the better environment for the passenger with the driver playing second fiddle, my choice would be the XJ. 


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week