Currently reading: Subaru BRZ long-term test review: six months with a cut-price sports car
It works brilliantly on track, but how did this sub £30k performance model handle half a year of urban-based life?

FINAL REPORT - scroll down for earlier reports

“It’s not very fast” was the opening remark a friend made after seeing the specification of our Subaru BRZ.

True, 197bhp and a 7.6sec 0-62mph time are nothing to shout about in 2018, but, after six months with the car, I am very aware of how little those things matter.

What matters is the way the BRZ makes you feel as a driver. Anyone can boot a throttle and let their car do the work, but few will be in something so confidence-inspiring that they can balance it on the edge of grip for a dozen or more laps on a drizzle-covered Brands Hatch. The BRZ is very good at that.

Thing is, we knew all that before our WR Blue Mica coupé arrived on the Autocar fleet. It’s a five-star road test car, after all.

What we didn’t know was how running a sub-£30k 2+2 sports car that prioritises driver engagement above all else would leave us. Would its low-slung body chin-slap every speed bump on my urban commute? Would a lack of torque from its naturally aspirated 2.0-litre flat four leave me trailing in the wake of electrified minicabs? I had six months to find out.


Back to top

The BRZ is a supremely competent machine, even in greasy conditions, where its quick steering (2.48 turns lock to lock) and alert chassis fill you with faith that the car will respond to your every command. It doesroll slightly, but this is part of the car’s communication process to let you know you’re approaching the limits of grip. The Michelin Primacy HP tyres don’t offer masses of bite – they’re eco-focused tyres – but they are remarkably consistent and showed very little sign of wear over the car’s 7000 or so miles with us.

Okay, the elephant in the room: as my friend asserted upon reading the car’s spec sheet, it is not particularly fast, but it has just about enough poke to be entertaining and, as I said in a recent report, I’m not sure I’d want a turbocharged engine over this if it meant losing some of the explosive top end power of Subaru’s flat-four. During six months, I met many who recommended I supercharge the engine, to offer the best of both worlds. Were I the permanent custodian of this car, the temptation would be there, but it would not be an overriding one.

Love it:

STUNNING LOOKS - Gleaming WR Blue Mica paint and silver/black 17in wheels ensure it turns heads like a supercar.

Back to top

FINE HANDLING - Few cars can mix a supple ride with composed cornering as well as this. It’s an ideal B-road companion.

RESPONSIVE STEERING - Not exactly dripping with feel but delightfully responsive to make the BRZ feel light on its toes.

UNDERDOG CHARACTER - Few modern cars can really get under your skin like this one. It’s like the plucky underdog everyone likes.

Loathe it:

LACKLUSTRE SWITCHGEAR - The design and quality of the buttons in the car’s cabin were at odds with its pretty exterior.


Entering the twilight phase of BRZ ownership has felt a bit like realising you’ve only got two day of your holiday left and you’re yet to leave the hotel complex.

Sure, I’ve had a great time with SU13 ARU, but the car’s fast approaching return date has made me realise that going for a country drive only two or three times a month over the summer was a sacrilegious lack of commitment. I have now righted my wrongs.

Over the past two weeks, almost every journey in the BRZ has been made using the sat-nav’s ‘avoid motorways’ setting (and not only because it’s so difficult to find the necessary infotainment menu to turn the setting off). Instead, I have sought out every apex, camber and potted country route within reach to answer the question hanging over our World Rally Blue Subaru since it arrived on the Autocar fleet: is this the best affordable driver’s car on sale today?

Back to top
Back to top

While leaving the field car park of a severely rained-on music festival, I discovered a remarkable thing about our Subaru BRZ: its 54/46 weight distribution and rear drive make for excellent mud-wading ability. I simply trundled through the sodden clay but others, in their front-driven hatches, struggled as their cars’ noses sunk deeper into the earth.

Mileage 6380


An astrophysicist once said that interstellar wormholes were our best bet for time travel, but he’d obviously never stepped inside a Subaru BRZ. If he had, he would have noticed that the buttons, the switches and the clock look like they’ve been transported through the fabric of time from 1993 to 2017, therefore proving that the BRZ is indeed from a different era.

That’s the only explanation I can think of to account for the reason so many of the details in the cabin are so square and lacking in design appeal. The numbers in the digital displays, the fonts on the centre console and the heated-seat controls all look like they came from that microwave you threw in the dump 15 years ago.

I’ll admit there are some aspects of the cabin I like. The steering wheel is refreshingly simple and feels right for the BRZ both in overall diameter and rim thickness. The instrument screen next to the dials is inoffensive and features some useful menus, including an oil temperature display and a live power and torque readout. Plus, the car’s seats are actually very comfortable. But, overall, the cabin isn’t anywhere near as pretty as the car’s exterior and so remains its weakest link.

Back to top

Perhaps it’s because Subaru’s development team was so busy ensuring the car was excellently balanced and fun to drive that the interior styling department ran out of time to complete the final details. By the time they realised that the cabin was sub-par, it was too late to do the job properly and they had to resort to a dusty old parts bin.

If the BRZ’s cabin design was improved, I’d argue that the car’s desirability would be substantially boosted. As proof, take the Mazda MX-5. The little Japanese two-seater has a cabin as eye-pleasing as its exterior, with a tidy layout and nicely matched details. Even the cabin’s air vents are a work of art. Enjoying the BRZ’s fine handling while toggling vents like those would make the experience feel as premium as it is fun – and I say this with confidence, having just spent a few days in a 2.0-litre MX-5.

But – and this is where I keep ending up – even when I was driving the MX-5, I still found myself missing the BRZ. I loved the Mazda’s more intuitive infotainment system, but that couldn’t counter my longing for the alertness of the BRZ’s chassis. The MX-5 is far from sluggish in its responses, but the BRZ somehow feels no heavier, despite actually being 156kg podgier, and is more eager to react to every degree of steering input. It really gives the impression of being on another level in terms of performance, even if the cars’ respective power and torque figures suggest that isn’t the case.

Back to top

The BRZ just feels more special to steer. It’s helped by a lower seating position that makes the car seem more hunkered down, giving you more confidence to drive it properly. Your attention is focused on soaking up the experience of driving.

You could say that although they are quite different in form and character, the BRZ and MX-5 are actually closely aligned rivals. After all, the prices of this BRZ and the MX-5 I drove are near identical.

As such, I’d argue that we’re lucky to live in a time when these cars are available concurrently. Having said that, nothing can convince me to chop in the BRZ, microwave buttons and all.


LOVE IT: The BRZ’s brakes are not over-assisted, unlike those of most modern cars, and the pedal offers a decent amount of feel.

LOATHE IT: The lightness of the BRZ’s body comes at a price: little sound insulation. Quite a lot of noise is generated on motorways.

Price £26,050 Price as tested £27,550 Economy 33.5mpg Faults None Expenses None Mileage 6104


Our BRZ has the top-spec infotainment system: a 7.0in touchscreen that’s made by Alpine but offered through Subaru dealers. Compared with the standard 6.2in set-up, our system adds sat-nav and DAB radio. It seems expensive at £1250 (excluding fitting), so if, like me, you use your smartphone for navigation and music, you could save that money for petrol instead.

Back to top


How ‘Subaru’ is the BRZ? Is it a ‘true’ Subaru?

These are questions I’ve been asked many times, often after someone accuses our car of being a “rebadged Toyota GT86”. So, to find out more about the true Subaru character, I jumped into a WRX STI – the yobbo of the Subaru range and a ‘proper Scooby’ – to see if I could identify any strands of DNA shared with the BRZ.

Like our BRZ, this WRX (pictured below) was finished in WR Blue Mica and featured a rear wing, but that’s where the similarities ended. The BRZ, with its slick coupé exterior, welcomes you into a low-slung seating position and feels like it’s tip-toeing down the road. By contrast, the WRX, with its muscular styling and upright chairs, feels harder and more antisocial as it chunters along.

Back to top

In fact, it feels quite awkward to drive and its controls are significantly less fluid to operate. The WRX is much faster – a given, due to its highly boosted 2.5-litre four-cylinder boxer engine offering 296bhp – but it is more difficult to predict and, as such, offers an less communicative experience than the BRZ.

Really, these cars feel like products from entirely different brands, which might suggest that the answer to our earlier question is ‘no’ – meaning that the BRZ is basically just a GT86 spin-off, right? Well, erm, no. My proof comes from a week-long stint in a GT86 (pic below), which proved to me that the BRZ’s brother from another mother is indeed noticeably different.

There are minor differences in various areas, but the most obvious contrast comes in the way the cars ride. The BRZ is firmer, particularly at the rear, which makes the GT86 more comfortable in town but in turn gives the BRZ slightly sharper handling on a B-road. The differences are small but they’re significant, as they send both cars off in different directions of focus.

You can feel that Toyota has engineered its GT86 to be more forgiving in several areas, therefore making it a slightly better all-rounder, while Subaru has made its BRZ the more aggressive of the pair. That’s a very Subaru thing to do, surely, so that means the answer to the questions posed at the start are ‘very’ and ‘yes’. I think. Can I go now?

Back to top


Price £26,050 Price as tested £27,550 Economy 29.1mpg Faults None Expenses None Mileage 5682


Brimming a 2+2 coupé with four adults and their luggage isn’t recommended, but I did it, and it was a squeeze. As such, the lug up the M1 from London to Leeds (pictured above) was marred by moans of numb legs and cramp. But the BRZ was extremely frugal (we averaged 42mpg) and, for the driver at least, a comfortable place to spend three-and-a-bit hours.


Price £26,050 Price as tested £27,550 Economy 42mpg Faults None Expenses None Mileage 5470


Back to top

The BRZ is fitted with eco-focused Michelin Primacy HP tyres which make it all the more entertaining on the road, because you can explore the car’s limits at relatively modest speeds. But on track, faced with grippier asphalt and far higher speeds, are these 215/45 R17 boots really up to the job?

A good place to test this is on the grand prix circuit at Brands Hatch. Undulations, changing surfaces, heavy braking zones and long corners mean there’s the potential for aggressive driving to melt the BRZ’s tyres off their rims. That’s a thought that’s unnerving when you’re fully committed into Paddock Hill Bend.

Few cars can feel so alive yet so predictable, and few can take so much abuse for so long. Even after 15 minutes of very hard driving, the brakes and tyres felt well within their limits. In fact, the tyres showed no physical signs of overheating after four 20-minute stints.

Of course, this car isn’t perfect on track – most modern hot hatches will power past it down the straights and other tyres would offer more grip – but for pure and consistent enjoyment on a circuit, it’s one of the best factory-spec road cars I’ve driven.


Price £26,050 Price as tested £27,550 Economy 32.4mpg Faults None Expenses None Mileage 4997


Back to top

A month into running our BRZ, I’ve learned two very significant things. One, the BRZ is not a supercar slayer, because it’s not particularly potent and those Michelin Primacy tyres don’t offer masses of grip. And two, I don’t give a hoot, because on the right road, in the right conditions, it is just sublime.

The reasons why are easy to explain. For starters, the car’s low centre of gravity gives it balance that cars of twice the value will envy, and its nicely weighted steering responds with an eagerness that makes it feel as though the whole car is wrapped around you and moving with your every input.

Power hard out of a corner with the engine turning over close to peak torque at around 6000rpm and the outside rear of the car will squat just enough to maximise traction but not so much that the opposing front tyre feels like it’s struggling to stay in touch with the ground.

It’s a remarkably satisfying feeling to work the car this hard, and despite sending just 197bhp to the back, the Torsen limited-slip differential locks just enough to enable delicate slides on corner exits.

Traction control and ESP, while not majorly intrusive when switched on, can thankfully be turned off completely, leaving it up to you to ensure the car stays on the black stuff. However, unlike with a car that has more power, you feel like you’re a long way from getting into trouble. The BRZ is a very forgiving machine, flattering both aggressive and smooth driving styles.

On an open and well-sighted B-road you can drive with a level of commitment that would send many other cars hurtling into a hedge. The BRZ dances and pivots around its centre and is small enough to thread along a British B-road without fear of stepping over the white lines.

This all translates into a car that is approachable but still feels like a proper sports car. My colleague Jimi Beckwith put it nicely after jumping straight out of a Mazda MX-5 and into the BRZ when he said the Subaru “feels more serious” and “like a specialist car”.

I agree. And for that reason, I won’t be giving up the keys to it any time soon again.

Back to top


Price £26,050 Price as tested £27,550 Economy 25.6mpg Faults None Expenses None Mileage 2748


You can’t buy a much purer car in 2017 than a Subaru BRZ.

With a naturally aspirated engine up front, a six-speed manual gearbox in the middle and drive that’s sent to the back, it really is a mouth-watering recipe for motoring nirvana. It is, of course, one that’s shared closely with the Toyota GT86, so that leaves us with one burning question: why would you buy the Subaru?

For me at least, there’s one very obvious answer: the colour. Admittedly, World Rally Blue isn’t the only colour the BRZ comes in, but it’s the only one you should go for. The paintjob hints at a motorsport pedigree that even Toyota – a firm with a history of performance models and a fine competition heritage – can’t quite match. That’s what Subaru’s 28-year stint in the World Rally Championship gets you, I suppose.

Of course, it isn’t the only reason why you might buy a BRZ over a GT86; there are technical reasons, too. Subaru gives its car a slightly more aggressive chassis set-up, making it the sharper of the pair, and the brand is also more closely aligned with the car’s distinctive 2.0-litre horizontally opposed four-cylinder engine, so it arguably warrants the right to a Subaru badge on its nose even more than it does Toyota’s.

Back to top

Then there are the visual details. The Subaru gets its own design of bumpers and light graphics, creating a more aggressive look front and rear. For me, the Subaru, in 2017 facelift guise especially, edges the GT86 for looks, although I admit that opinions will vary. Then again, only one comes in World Rally Blue.

Inside, the Subaru gets a slightly different trim finish to an interior that’s otherwise identical to that of the Toyota. Our car comes with the £1500 option of a touchscreen satellite navigation and infotainment system, and it’s an option box well worth ticking.

Overall, the cabin feels pretty solid. It bridges the line between functionality and sportiness quite well, although some buttons do feel like they’ve been transplanted directly from the early 1990s. In particular, the digital clock on the centre console looks like it belongs in a museum.

I like the driving position, which allows you to get nice and low in the car and have your arms stuck out straight ahead. That said, I’m quite long-legged, so in order to achieve the perfect arm reach, my legs are just slightly more cramped than they’d be in, say, a Porsche 718 Cayman.

But it’s unfair to compare the BRZ, which starts at £26,050 in its entry form, to a car whose entry price starts at around £13,000 more. Better to compare it with the Mazda MX-5 RF, which, with a 2.0-litre engine, costs from £23,395. While the BRZ lacks a folding roof, it feels significantly more focused on the road than the MX-5, while its boxer engine just edges the Mazda’s more conventional in-line four for character.

Back to top

The BRZ also faces competition from the Nissan 370Z, which costs from £29,185. Not even the BRZ’s flatfour is a match for the 370Z’s brawny 3.7-litre V6, which is both more urgent to use and more aurally pleasing to listen to. The 370Z’s muscular appearance gives it a more grown-up appearance, too, whereas the BRZ, especially with its sporty rear wing, looks a little more youthful.

But the BRZ wins in the way it tackles any given road. You have to stroke a 370Z along a twisting country lane, managing the car’s hefty 1496kg kerb weight, while the sprightlier BRZ – it weighs 1242kg – can be hustled like a hooligan. The engine needs to be thrashed in order to work properly, because maximum torque of 151lb ftis only available between 6400rpm and 6600rpm, while its 178bhp power peak follows later still at 7000rpm. But this hunger for revs suits the car’s character perfectly.

The Subaru is certainly no rocketship, taking 7.6sec to reach 62mph from rest and maxing out at 140mph. But it’s a proper sports car with old-school charm and bags of character, so even after just 1500 miles of ownership, my first impressions of it are very good (if you hadn’t already worked that out).

We’ve got the next six months to find out what it’s like to live with SU13 ARU (see what they did there?). It’ll need to be as frugal as it is fun, as flexible as it is agile and as comfortable as it is attractive. In exchange, I promise to keep that World Rally Blue paint gleaming.


Price £26,050 Price as tested £27,550 Options Sat-nav £1500 Economy 27.9mpg Faults None Expenses None

Join the debate

Add a comment…
ianp55 17 January 2018

Subaru BRZ

Bought mine in May 2016 pre registered from a  Subaru dealer in Chard with 200 miles on the clock, don't do that much milage these days but without question the BRZ is the most fun to drive that  any car that I've owned since I passed my driving test in 1975. Truly wonderful, trouble is.there's nothing to replace it unless you want to pay shed loads of money more.

Zeddy 17 January 2018

True, 197bhp and a 7.6sec 0

True, 197bhp and a 7.6sec 0-62mph time are nothing to shout about in 2018, but, after six months with the car, I am very aware of how little those things matter.


So many shout from the stands about the lack of power but have never driven one to understand why it's great to drive.

xxxx 17 January 2018

20's mpg

"The car doesn’t have stop/start, so the average economy figure tumbles in heavy traffic." I don't think stop-start would make a significant difference.

STOP-START is more PAIN-IN-THE-ARSE, first thing me and the wife do is turn it off when we get the car.

FMS 21 September 2018

xxxx wrote:

xxxx wrote:

"The car doesn’t have stop/start, so the average economy figure tumbles in heavy traffic." I don't think stop-start would make a significant difference.

STOP-START is more PAIN-IN-THE-ARSE, first thing me and the wife do is turn it off when we get the car.


Doubtless you also park up and leave the engine idling for ages...very inconsiderate, very obviously you. Seems you have much in common with your opinion of STOP-START. TwIT