Currently reading: Nissan Leaf long-term test review: 110-mile range isn't such a set-back
We head off on a daunting 350-mile round trip in our electric hatchback
Steve Cropley Autocar
News
3 mins read
19 May 2016

Nearly all of my 2000 Leaf miles have come so far from shortish, sub-100-mile journeys, well within our new 30kWh car’s realistic range of about 110 miles.

It has been easy: there are cosseting semi-fast chargers at home in the Cotswolds, at my weekday London base and at the office in Twickenham. The Nissan has been universally useful, refined and enjoyable.

However, I’ve been secretly berating myself for not manning up and attempting The Big One, whereby you lay an elementary plan then set a course for the far horizon, trusting the facilities on the way and when you get there.

The chance came a couple of days ago. I had an appointment in Sheffield in the late morning and some more business back in London in the evening. That meant I could leave fairly early and learn lessons from the 170-mile outward trip, applying them on the way back.

At first I was cautious, drifting carefully up through London to the base of the M1 then cruising at 60mph (the speed I’d learned was efficient from talking to other Leaf owners) thereafter. Most of the time I tried to tuck in behind one of those 58mph trucks — which allowed me to cruise with two blobs of power on the display that shows how much you’re drawing from the battery, rather than three. It worked; on a still, sunny day, the distance I’d travelled and the distance to go added up to 130 miles, which seemed like plenty.

But it was boring, so I developed a better technique. Driving the Leaf enhances your awareness of gradients, so on gentle downward slopes I’d emerge from behind my friendly truck and tickle it up to around 70mph. Then on the next up-slope I’d find another helpful HGV and go back to two blobs. Lesson one: gather speed and cut time by going fast downhill.

At 80 miles I stopped to recharge, not so much from need but boredom, the Ecotricity recharging ‘bowser’ (easy to use and, in my experience, reliable) showing I still had 38% to run. Within 20 minutes we were back to 83%, but the last 15% — I gave up at 98% — took as long again. Lesson two: don’t bother with the final 15-20% charge on fast chargers; it comes slowly.

We made better time than expected (this often happens; tow a race car over a long distance and you often develop a pleasant rhythm), so I stopped a few miles from Sheffield for another 8% tickle, meaning that when the meeting was over the car was ready for 80-odd miles homeward from the off. And this time I seemed better at picking 65mph high-top vans to sit behind.

I arrived in plenty of time for my 7pm meeting, not at all fatigued (comfy seats) but feeling good because the trip showed we had covered 356 miles for minimal fatigue — and zero expenditure.

Back to top

Truth is, it was easy. Better still, I won’t feel daunted next time. For the Leaf owner, this is an important threshold to cross.

Price £27,230 (after £4500 gov’t grant); Price as tested £28,380; Economy 3.6 miles/kWh Faults None Expenses None

Read our previous reports:

Bigger battery, better car?

 

Join the debate

Comments
18
Add a comment…
Phil R 2 June 2016

Charging Strategy

Presumably if you were to do the trip again you would cruise at 70 odd and spend the 20 minutes going from 83% to 98% at a different set of services charging up the battery at its peak charging range of up to 80%? Quite impressive that there are 5 different ecotricity bowsers that you can stop up going up the M1, though it will be good when they are across the country.
Dolphinman 21 May 2016

Grabbed me, too

Having had a lifetime in the Motor Trade and having seen various trends and 'fads' which may ( or may not ) become the norm, I read articles such as this with interest. I've driven Leaf, Zoe, Tesla and Twizy (don't laugh) and am really interested in how electric vehicles will progress. I also drove a Modec two tonne van but, unfortunately, the company couldn't sustain the losses until 'critical mass' occurred and they closed it down.
It would seem that getting enough reliable charging points is a real necessity whilst waiting for battery technology to give 3-400 mile range or even quickly replaceable batteries at filling stations.
The Apprentice 19 May 2016

I often drive in a similar

I often drive in a similar way and I am pretty sure he wasn't that close to the trucks or trying to slipstream. Most trucks drive at a fairly constant speed on the limiter, their height gives the driver great visibility ahead so they tend to plan moves in good time. Slotting in behind one at a good distance and following it means a steady speed relaxed drive, no need to waste energy by speeding up and slowing down all the time and that 10mph less than what you will average in the middle lane makes little over 10 minutes difference over 100 miles. You avoid all that stress of the pushing and shoving going on in the other lanes with short lived moments of speed intersected by just as many moments of frustration. I agree with Mondeal, the network is still nowhere good enough for proper long distance EV use, I know of single output chargers that have been down for weeks and if you don't check and arrive without enough power to reach the next one your stranded. At least with a hybrid you can use petrol.