V40, S60, V60, XC60, V70 and XC70 benefit from more efficient Drive-E engines as part of MY16 changes

Volvo has announced sweeping changes to its V40, S60, V60, XC60, V70 and XC70 model ranges for the 2016 model year. The changes bring Volvo’s four-cylinder Drive-E engine range to its full front-wheel drive model range.

Built to a maximum capacity of 2.0-litres, the four-cylinder Drive-E engines use a combination of turbocharging, supercharging and electrification. In its most powerful form, the Drive-E powertrain is capable of producing 286bhp.

Joining the D5 and D4 Drive-E engines launched in 2014 are new units, badged T2, T3, D2 and D3 - they produce 120bhp, 150bhp, 118bhp and 148bhp respectively. In the V40, the new powertrains mean all diesel models come with CO2 emissions of less than 100g/km, with 94g/km emitted in D2 form alongside a claimed 78.5mpg.

In the petrol V40, the new 1.5-litre T2 and T3 engines - both linked to an automatic transmission - can return 51.4mpg with CO2 emissions of 129g/km. The two diesel options are also available in the V40 Cross Country.

The D2 and D3 diesel engines also appear in the S60, bringing CO2 emissions of as low as 99g/km and fuel economy of up to 74.3mpg. Petrol-powered S60 models, meanwhile, benefit from the T3 engine in both manual and automatic forms.

The V60 Hybrid has been renamed D6 Twin Engine - in line with the recently-launched XC90 T8 Twin Engine - and features a range-topping power output of 286bhp, as well as CO2 emissions of 48g/km and fuel economy of 155mpg. 

The larger XC60 retains its current five-cylinder D4 and D5 all-wheel drive engine options, but also get a more powerful D4 option, which now produces 187bhp.

Volvo’s new D3 engine also appears in the V70, where it returns up to 68.9mpg, while in the larger XC70 the D4 and D5 engine options both benefit from improved emissions.

As well as the new and improved engine choices, other changes including new paint and wheel options also feature as part of the MY16 changes.

In a statement, Volvo said: “This roll-out of the Drive-E powertrain family, Volvo’s in-house designed and built engines and gearboxes, marks a further step in its technological independence and also ends Volvo’s reliance on engines sourced from other manufacturers.”

Get the latest car news, reviews and galleries from Autocar direct to your inbox every week. Enter your email address below:

Our Verdict

Volvo V40

Volvo tilts at the hatchback elite and aims to woo business drivers

Join the debate

Comments
15

28 April 2015
I wonder now that JLR & Volvo are building their own engines, how Ford UK's output will be affected. When they stopped building cars here to focus on engine manufacture, Ford still owned both of these groups. Hopefully their own demand will cover the deficit, which surely, they must have known was coming.

28 April 2015
Outoftowner1969 wrote:

I wonder now that JLR & Volvo are building their own engines, how Ford UK's output will be affected. When they stopped building cars here to focus on engine manufacture, Ford still owned both of these groups. Hopefully their own demand will cover the deficit, which surely, they must have known was coming.

Most of the new JLR/Volvo engines will be the diesel version which PSA built for Ford, JLR and Volvo under the Ford-PSA engine alliance - with Ford building the petrol versions and the V6/V8 diesels still used by JLR.

29 April 2015
Ruperts Trooper wrote:
Outoftowner1969 wrote:

I wonder now that JLR & Volvo are building their own engines, how Ford UK's output will be affected. When they stopped building cars here to focus on engine manufacture, Ford still owned both of these groups. Hopefully their own demand will cover the deficit, which surely, they must have known was coming.

Most of the new JLR/Volvo engines will be the diesel version which PSA built for Ford, JLR and Volvo under the Ford-PSA engine alliance - with Ford building the petrol versions and the V6/V8 diesels still used by JLR.

Actually non of the new Volvo diesel engines will be PSA/Ford, the Drive-E range completely replaces them, but you are correct the JLR V6 and V8 diesels will still be the PSA/Ford units, JLR will also continue to use Ford 4 pot ECO-Boost petrol engines for the foreseeable future until its Ingenium range is fully up to speed.

28 April 2015
According to Volvo's own downloadable leaflet tthe MY16 XC60 has a power output in D4 form of 190 HP, not 187.

28 April 2015
fellwalker wrote:

According to Volvo's own downloadable leaflet tthe MY16 XC60 has a power output in D4 form of 190 HP, not 187.

It's the difference between 190 PS and 187 BHP - much of the motoring press mixes up the two units of measurement.

Stupid really as PS is a German domestic standard which shouldn't be used outside Germany - given that ISO and the EU standardises on KW I'm not sure PS should even be used inside Germany.

28 April 2015
"In the petrol V40, the new 1.5-litre T2 and T3 engines - both linked to an automatic transmission - can return 51.4mpg with CO2 emissions of 129g/km." If the figure 51.4 mpg is the Combined figure then for a new 1.5 engine it's not good enough. The VW 1.4 is 150hp, 60.1 mpg and CO 110, and that's not new.

 

Hydrogen cars just went POP

28 April 2015
But thats with a DSG gearbox, not a torque convertor Auto like the Volvo figures quoted above. I bet on manual gearboxes they will be more closely matched. I would take Volvos 8 speed torque converter Auto over VW's 7 speed dsg any day of the week. The DSG is scary and unreliable.

28 April 2015
Ok, The Manual is 59 mpg and CO 112, still far better than the Volvo. Regardless of gearbox the small VW 150bhp 1.4 has better stats.

 

Hydrogen cars just went POP

28 April 2015
winniethewoo wrote:

But thats with a DSG gearbox, not a torque convertor Auto like the Volvo figures quoted above. I bet on manual gearboxes they will be more closely matched. I would take Volvos 8 speed torque converter Auto over VW's 7 speed dsg any day of the week. The DSG is scary and unreliable.

Ok, The Manual is 59 mpg and CO 112, still far better than the Volvo. Regardless of gearbox the small VW 150bhp 1.4 has better stats.

 

Hydrogen cars just went POP

28 April 2015
xxxx wrote:
winniethewoo wrote:

But thats with a DSG gearbox, not a torque convertor Auto like the Volvo figures quoted above. I bet on manual gearboxes they will be more closely matched. I would take Volvos 8 speed torque converter Auto over VW's 7 speed dsg any day of the week. The DSG is scary and unreliable.

Ok, The Manual is 59 mpg and CO 112, still far better than the Volvo. Regardless of gearbox the small VW 150bhp 1.4 has better stats.

This time, instead of speculating from what I read before, I did some research. And yeah, Volvo with the manual emits 127g/km CO2, only 2g/km lower than the Auto, so is way behind VW. Given the similarities in figures to the Ford 1.5 Ecoboost, (cylinder count, power, capacity) I am suspicious this "new Volvo" engine is another Ford unit.

I assumed these were the modular 3 Cylinder 1.5 litre Drive E engines we heard about a last year. They can't be because they have 4 cylinders. When the real 3 cylinder Volvo engines are done, I am guessing they should at least match VW's figures.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Kia Stonic
    First Drive
    18 October 2017
    Handsome entrant into the bulging small crossover market has a strong engine and agile handling, but isn’t as comfortable or complete as rivals
  • Hyundai Kona
    First Drive
    18 October 2017
    Hyundai's funky-looking Kona crossover with a peppy three-cylinder engine makes all the right noises for the car to be a success in a crowded segment
  • Citroën C3 Aircross
    First Drive
    17 October 2017
    The Citroen C3 Aircross has got funky looks and a charming interior, but it's another small SUV, and another dynamic miss. Numb steering is just one thing keeping it from class best
  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq
  • Audi Q7 e-tron
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Expensive and flawed but this understated diesel-electric Audi Q7 has a lot to offer