Currently reading: Frankfurt motor show: Mini Roadster
Mazda MX-5 and Audi TT Roadster rival launched
3 mins read
16 September 2009

The second of Mini’s new models will be this two-seat Roadster, unveiled at Frankfurt and due on sale in 2011.

The sister car to the Mini Coupe, the Mini Roadster will target the Mazda MX-5 and Audi TT Roadster. It will be built in the UK at Mini’s Oxford plant.

See the high-res Mini Roadster photo gallery

Based around the same re-engineered Mini Convertible bodyshell as the Coupe, the Roadster concept shares that car’s rakish A-pillars and lowered roofline.

The front pillars slope back an extra 16 degrees on the concept, an expensive feature to re-engineer but one that also gives the car a sportier look.

“The glasshouse is significantly lower, slimmer and more dynamic than the regular production models, providing a strikingly sleek silhouette,” Mini claims.

However, it is unclear if the production versions will feature this expensive change. One of the issues in sloping back the windscreen like this is the effect on the car’s performance in US crash tests. These have to cater for unbelted occupants because wearing a seatbelt is still not compulsory in many US states.

A source who has seen the production versions of both Coupé and Roadster suggests that the production models will not have the same degree of pillar rake.

The Roadster will also share its boot lid pressing with the Coupe, although clever body engineering means that they open in different ways.

On the Coupe it forms part of a roof-hinged hatch, while on the Roadster it opens like a conventional boot lid (unlike that of the Convertible, which hinges from the bottom). Boot volume is the same as that of the Coupe at 250 litres. The Roadster’s boot size remains the same regardless of whether the roof is stowed or not.

Where the Roadster differs from the Coupe is the lightweight, manual canvas roof that folds down just proud of the rear deck lid to open the cabin to the elements.

There’s no cosmetic body-coloured cover for the roof, for engineering simplicity and to keep weight down, so the roof is visible when stowed.

There’s a significantly different paint finish for the Roadster concept too. The white-and-gold colour scheme echoes a haute couture fashion theme, just like the Chanel-style houndstooth seat material.For the first time, a Mini gets body-coloured grille bars in place of the characteristic chrome finish.

Also different are the powerplants for its two new concepts, to reflect their different characters. This choice may well be reflected in production, too.


Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

Back to top

The harder-edged Coupe is powered by the 208bhp JCW version of the Mini’s 1.6-litre twin-scroll turbocharged engine, while the Roadster is matched to the more refined 175bhp Cooper S 1.6 turbo.

There are no details on performance yet, although it is reasonable to assume that acceleration and top speeds will be very close to those of the regular Mini hatchbacks with similar engines.

Despite the use of a less frantic version of the 1.6-litre turbo engine, Mini says its new open-top is intended as a rewarding drive.

That’s one of the reasons why the Roadster is equipped with a simple, unpowered roof to keep weight and complexity down.

Ease of use is also important, with a clever, through-bulkhead compartment offering access to the boot. Items stored in the boot for security can be accessed from the passenger seat through the bulkhead. And the hatch can be locked to deter opportunist thieves.

There’s no official guide to Roadster prices yet, but it seems reasonable to assume at least a £3k premium over equivalent-engined hatchback Minis. That would mean a price of around £17k for a Cooper Chili, rising to nearly £22k for a Cooper S Chili.

Julian Rendall

Twitter - follow all the latest Mercedes reviews, news and video

Join the debate


15 September 2009

If a few Americans dumb enough not to wear a seatbelt in some demonstration of their constitutional rights have to die in order for us to get better looking cars then so be it.

15 September 2009

Here, Here.

If you get killed not wearing a seatbelt it's your fault!

Really love the car though!!!

15 September 2009

It's a nice looking car...

15 September 2009

It is nice looking. But is it different enough from the regular cabriolet to justify the loss of the back seats? Why not just buy a proper sportscar?

15 September 2009

Must say its the best looking Mini so far, but £25,000?? is that really compeating against the Mazda MX-5 when a 2.0 powershift is nearly £4000 cheaper?

I'm sure the same old adage of 'Mini badge must be trendy so must buy' will happen as usual.

15 September 2009

It looks so much better without the silly back seats that no one can fit in to anyway. Lots of these cabrios would be better without them.

15 September 2009

These cars are hideous, the coupe the more so.

15 September 2009

UGLY! Like a Micra CC but worse. How long do we have to wait before Mini comes up with some properly new ideas or dies like every other fashion accesory.

15 September 2009

[quote slipslop]

These cars are hideous, the coupe the more so.


Agreed. It wont cost anymore to build than the already stupidly expensive hatchback (same chassis, floorplans and engine) and everything bar the steering wheel will be an 'optional extra' yet they will charge an extortionate amount extra (£3000) to anyone gullable enough to want one.

Dear MINI:

"Havent you heard yet? The joke is over. You've been rumbled"

15 September 2009

I agree these cars are horrendously expensive for what they are, yet there seems to be a market for them. Which makes Audi's decision to pull the A1 from Frankfurt all the more puzzling. There are rumours that the dealerships think nobody will buy a small car at premium prices and Audi is having second thoughts. Shame.


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week