Currently reading: Tougher safety tests in US
US road safety regulator is to introduce tougher testing for 2011

US road safety regulator the NHTSA is set to introduce more stringent safety testing for the 2011 model year.

The new tests will make it more difficult for new cars sold in the US to earn a five-star safety rating and will make it easier for consumers to compare vehicles.

The new ratings given to cars will represent a combination of that vehicle’s results from frontal crash, side impact and rollover tests.

A completely new test has been introduced that simulates a single-vehicle impact with a telegraph pole or tree. The test will also include evaluations of electronic safety gadgets, such as collision warnings.

NHTSA says that the changes mean three-star rated vehicles will provide average or close to average injury protection. A total of 55 new 2011 vehicles, including 24 cars, will be tested. These include the BMW 5 Series, Volkswagen Jetta and Infiniti M.

It will not be possible to compare the new scores with those of the old system so the list is made up of both brand new models and older vehicles likely to be purchased in large numbers next year.

Transportation secretary Ray LaHood said: “This new testing program significantly raises the safety bar for all vehicle manufacturers and will provide consumers with a great deal more safety information about the cars and trucks they want to buy.”

Read the latest F1 race reports, blogs, news and video


Latest business news

99 bmw ix vs mercedes eqs 2022 lead 0 0
From 2024, 22% of a car maker's sales must be BEVs – or it faces a £15,000 fine for every car that does not conform
Editor's letter: EV sales must increase by 50% in 2024 – how?
93 ev charger suppliers under scrutiny podpoint
PodPoint recently switched focus from fast public devices to home and workplace charging
EV charger companies switch tactics in search for elusive profits
Volvo car charging
From 2024, car makers will need to show that 45% of an EV's value originated in the UK or EU to remain tariff-free
EU proposes three-year delay to UK rules of origin tariffs
geneva motor show floor 2018
The Geneva motor show hasn't been held since 2019, due to the pandemic and its after-effects
Geneva motor show 2024: MG confirmed and BYD likely

Join the debate

Add a comment…
shopa 3 August 2010

Re: Tougher safety tests in US

I have invented a way to make small cars safer in collisions.
It will allow auto makers to make their cars lighter to help meet the new CAFE fuel economy rules.
It will also help auto makers meet the new NHTSA side impact into a pole test.

Electric vehicle range is very sensitive to vehicle weight, and my invention can enable substantial weight reduction. Less steel will be needed to protect passengers.

The invention has been granted US patents 7,695,018 and 7,699,347.

The invention is free to use outside of the USA.

Please help me promote this invention that can save fuel and lives.

beachland2 2 August 2010

Re: Tougher safety tests in US

New tougher tests are good, the maximum scores should always be impossible to achieve.

it means cars will cost more though, but insurance wont go down as the car will be worth more to buy, and the occupants still get injured at low speed crashes which is what the insurance premiums are covering. A 20 year old supermini fitted with an FIA seat and harness and HANS system will be safer overall than a 2010 reg volvo estate. And insurance companies should think about that. its not possible to get back pains/neck injuries or whiplash etc. at low speed crashes if your body/head cant move. saving £millions every year in personal injury claims.

Phinehas 2 August 2010

Re: Tougher safety tests in US

There is a side-impact test in ENCAP but that is different from a pole-test which in theory at least, concentrates the point of impact into a narrow vertical line. It would be a bit of a meaningless test in my opinion because unless you hit your chosen telephone pole at the same point along the car as the test, the resultant damage/injury profile will in no way reflect those seen in the test; unless they're going to perform a series of tests along the length of the car, that is.

Whilst not suggesting that structural integrity in impacts is of no value -quite the contrary- I think these tests are getting a bit over the top. How many more things can you test for without making the car into a tank?

  • Airbourne building-strike test? (Seemingly a favourite of BMWs)
  • Cow jumping over a hedge after being shot with an air rifle and landing on the bonnet test? (Happened to an uncle of mine)
  • Driving off a cliff test? (Quite a common 'safety' stunt in the 30s)
  • Upper deck of supposedly earthquake-proofed freeway collapsing onto vehicle test?
  • Passenger's underpants exploding test?