Currently reading: Senate rejects car maker bailout
Chrysler and GM on the ropes as funding fails

The US Senate failed to vote through a $14 billion bailout proposal for GM and Chrysler last night in a move that could sink both firms.

Republican opposition to the House of Representatives bill had been mounting in the Senate, and the package was eventually thrown out by a 52-35 vote.

"We have worked and worked and we can spend all night tonight, tomorrow, Saturday, and Sunday, and we're not going to get to the finish line," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. "That's just the way it is. There's too much difference between the two sides."

Before the vote, it emerged that General Motors had already hired a team of lawyers and bankers to work out whether the car maker would be better served applying for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

This morning shares in London plummeted 180 points on the back of the US deal collapsing.

If GM and Chrysler do go bankrupt, the knock-on consequences for Ford will be extremely disruptive. Its key tier one suppliers are likely to go out of business.

Asian car companies - including Toyota, Honda and Nissan, whose shares have all taken a battering as a result of this – are concerned that, if GM and Chrysler collapse, the market could be flooded with cheap cars.

A glimmer of hope for GM and Chrysler comes from the White House.

In an effort to urge sceptical congressmen to pass the bill, Bush administration officials briefed that if Congress didn’t act, the White House may have to step in order to save jobs.

Bush could siphon funds from the Troubled Asset Relief program, and this loan could be offered to the car makers with much fewer restrictions than the Congress package.

Private conversations are understood to be continuing behind the scenes.

Join the debate

Comments
15
Add a comment…
julianphillips 12 December 2008

Re: Senate rejects US bailout for car makers

You've been SERVED, Scotty!

North 12 December 2008

Re: Senate rejects US bailout for car makers

Steve Steele wrote:
able to get a third parliament in somewhere near Big Ben ?

Hi Grettel; I genuinely thought that the Governors where in the lower house........my mistake and apologies......(I see you are learning to read.....).....I looked it up on Wiki and found they are also elected every 4 years with the exception of a couple of states.

For Congressmen/women I could not see (only gave it a quick glance) on the amount of time they are are elected for.....however, I am pretty sure (correct me if I am wrong) that it is every two years and Senators every four.......

As for the numbering I used that simplistic, but I remember you had issues with numbers in the past.....so just for you http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counting and as this is your second comprehension aspect today.......... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comprehension

Lee23404 12 December 2008

Re: Senate rejects US bailout for car makers

scotty5 wrote:

You blame the unions for the problems - unbelievable! Perhaps if the management treated and managed their workforce in a responsible manner there wouldn't be any need for union intervention.

Are you mad? I've just heard on Fox news that a typical GM auto worker earns $72 an hour. And no thats not a typo. A typical US Honda worker "only" earns $42 an hour. The republicans wouldn't vote for the plan due to amongst other things these wage issues. The unions are going to kill of the US car industry like they did the UK car industry in the 70's.