From £13,100
More nicely warmed through than really hot, but this well-sorted and likeable hatch is the best of its type.

Our Verdict

Suzuki Swift Sport
The Swift Sport feels decidedly old-school, and is all the better for it

The Swift Sport is cheap, pretty and chuckable. Only the quality of the Ford Fiesta keeps it from best in class

  • First Drive

    Suzuki Swift Sport 1.6

    Updated Suzuki Swift Sport gets added pace and precision, but retains its old-school entertaining handling
  • First Drive

    Suzuki Swift Sport

    More nicely warmed through than really hot, but this well-sorted and likeable hatch is the best of its type.
5 September 2006

What is it?

It’s the Suzuki Swift Sport - a Suzuki Swift (very good too), with a dose of Sportiness. Not too much, mind: this isn’t a GTi competitor, because that would be expensive and hard to insure. So it gets a 1.6-litre engine with 125bhp, 17-inch alloys, a 0-62mph time of 8.9sec and will cost near enough £11,500 when it goes on sale in October.

What’s it like?

Very nice, as it happens. The regular Swift’s a decent car: well built, looks good on the outside, is interesting and attractive inside. This Sport version just improves it for the keener driver. There’s a sweet gearbox (though 4th to 5th balks), good throttle response and a very progressive clutch, so the drivetrain is peachily smooth. And although it’s not fast, the Sport is reasonably brisk. The engine makes a decent noise at higher revs, too. All the more shame, then, that the pedals are hopelessly spaced for easy heel-and-toe downshifts. At pace, the steering is fairly weighty, with strong self-centring and slightly dull reactions, which is a pity given the rest of the controls are so positive. The Sport gets Monroe dampers and uprated springs and bushings. They tighten body control but, because the ride’s still respectable, there are more body movements than the keenest drivers will want. Still, the Swift Sport is agile and grips well. An ESP system has also been developed specifically for this derivative that allows a decent amount of slip angle before gently interfering.

Should I buy one?

If you’re thinking of buying a Citroën C2 VTR then yes, you should. This is better in just about every way. It’s also faster and cheaper than a Mini Cooper, though can’t match that car’s tactile appeal. And while it’s not the keenest drive, in terms of affordable small semi-sporting hatches, it’s the best there is.

 

Join the debate

Comments
1

sat

25 March 2008

It’s the Suzuki Swift Sport - a Suzuki Swift (very good too), Damn right its good. Its a great looking car with an aggressive stance i bought minr in september last year in an open evening type thing for under £11k. Amazing, i thought. The only fault ive had so far is 2nd gear, maybe i was being too vigourous with it with the phenonmal acceleratioon through 2nd 3rd and 4th. It defineltly needs a sixth gear though as there's too much torque for the engine to handle. Apart from that it is truly a great car. Sat from Wednesbury.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • 2016 Audi A3 Sportback e-tron UK review
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    First UK drive finds the facelifted A3 Sportback e-tron remains a first-rate plug-in hybrid that is packed with tech if a little short on driver appeal
  • Citroen C11.2 Puretech 82 Furio
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    Citroën's city car gets a new sporty-looking trim level, adding visual adornments, but no premium for the 1.2-litre Puretech triple we're driving
  • Mercedes C350e Sport
    First Drive
    28 September 2016
    Petrol-electric C-Class is a surprisingly well-priced alternative to a diesel but not the greatest example of the new ‘PHEV’ breed
  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka