From £19,590
Fast fun for the family

Our Verdict

Renault Grand Scenic
Renault's Grand Scenic played a key role in popularising large MPVs

The Renault Grand Scenic isn't interesting to drive, but it is pleasurable to sit in and live with

Yes, it’s a turbocharged petrol engine in Renault’s oh-so sensible Grand Scénic, that paragon of family values. You know you’ve grown up when you buy a Scénic – so is this Renault’s attempt to give its midi-MPV some youthful driver appeal?

Renault calls the 2.0-litre turbo-charged 16-valver (the same 2.0-litre unit found in the rest of the Mégane range but with a blower added) a ‘high-performance’ engine and claims 0-60mph in 9.6sec – quick for a vehicle of the Grand Scénic’s size and weight. 

In a straight-line dash, however, it doesn’t feel that quick – this is not a spool-up-the-turbo-and-wait-for-the-punch kind of engine – and it’s really the mid-range kick that shows off the engine’s increased power and torque. The 2.0-litre pulls strongly from idle, with the 199lb ft peak torque at 3250rpm, but if you use the new-found performance expect 30mpg or less.

Where the naturally aspirated 2.0-litre engine gets a little noisy and harsh at high revs, this one stays pleasantly quiet and refined from idle to a 90mph cruise. In fact, the whole car is very civilised, with little wind or road noise, even on notoriously noisy concrete motorways.

Road manners are less civilised – the 2.0T’s steering is numb and overly light, and doesn’t provide a consistent level of feel. The brake pedal has a disconcerting inch of travel before it has any effect on the brakes, and the ride is noisy and harsh at low speeds over rutted urban roads. Despite the turbo, this is still very much an MPV, not a driver’s car.

Inside it’s a world of storage and space, high-quality plastics and excellent fit and finish. It’s a shame about the fiddly, cheap-feeling stereo and slow-witted navigation system, which are hard to use and spoil the effect of quality.

Would we take the 2.0T over the excellent 1.9 dCi diesel, which has significantly better economy, is £797 cheaper and spits out less CO2? Probably not, but if your alternative is the £18,410 naturally aspirated 2.0-litre petrol, try and stretch to the 2.0T. It’s no Vauxhall Zafira GSi, but you’ll appreciate the extra performance and refinement from the engine.

Dan Stevens

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Mercedes C350e Sport
    First Drive
    28 September 2016
    Petrol-electric C-Class is a surprisingly well-priced alternative to a diesel but not the greatest example of the new ‘PHEV’ breed
  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka
  •  Maserati Ghibli Diesel
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    Maserati releases another range of updates for its range best seller, the Ghibli. We've driven the diesel version, but there's little improvement on before
  • Tipo Front
    First Drive
    21 September 2016
    New Fiat Tipo offers impressive space and practicality for a reasonable price. We try the 1.6 diesel on the demanding roads of North Wales