From £31,38510
Second-generation Ford Focus RS shreds the front-drive rule book
11 December 2014

What is it?

It’s hard to know where to start when describing the all-new 163mph, 301bhp Ford Focus RS. In simple terms this is the second generation of a car which cost Ford an awful lot of money at the beginning of this century, but that also did lots to restore the public’s faith in the RS brand.

What’s more, the new Ford Focus RS will turn a profit for the Blue Oval this time round – assuming Ford can find homes for the 8000 examples it intends to build over the next two years. How so? Because at last Ford has worked out a way of making the Focus RS on a regular Focus production line, a rather more economically sound method of production compared with the “I’ll build this bit, you build that bit, and maybe we’ll get someone else to fit that part before we paint it” construction technique of first-generation model.

The most controversial aspect of the car is its drivetrain, which remains front, not four-wheel drive. Ford’s engineers have developed and patented a system called the RevoKnuckle which, they claim, eradicates torque steer by keeping the kingpin offset angle very consistent, even under heavy load. And when you have 301bhp and a whopping 324lb ft on tap courtesy of a heavily modified version of the 2.5-litre turbo motor found in the Focus ST, this is crucial.

The chassis has been stiffened by approximately 30 per cent and there are bigger driveshafts, a much wider track, lower ride height and a faster steering rack.

What's it like?

In the raw the RS looks like a proper thug-mobile. From its gaping grille to its 19in wheels and tyres and enormous wing, the RS leaves you in no doubt about its intentions.

The big question, of course, is whether Ford really has managed to develop a front suspension system that enables the RS to deploy its 301bhp and 324lb ft without feeling like an unguided Exocet missile. And we’re glad to report that the answer is a resounding, faintly befuddled “you bet”.

What happens when you select second gear and give it full beans in the RS frankly feels like some form of miracle, because even on a rough or wet surface the car takes off without drama, feeling for all the world as if it is four, not two-wheel drive. Considering how much raw thrust there is – Ford claims 0-60mph in 5.9sec, 0-100mph in 14sec dead and a top speed of 163mph – it’s quite weird to begin with. You even wonder whether they’re fibbing about how many wheels are being driven.

In the event this is just one of many tricks which the extraordinary new Focus RS has up its sleeve. What we are talking about is a car that really does shred the rule book on front-wheel-drive dynamics, but one that’s also civilised and well mannered enough to live with every day.

And when you do go for it, do not expect to be disappointed. Even with as little as 1800rpm showing it goes, and goes hard, in all of the first five gears. In sixth you need to wait until just over 2000rpm before the whirlwind of torque begins to blow you, and then throw you, towards the horizon.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Find an Autocar review

Back to top

If anything the Focus RS feels faster than the raw numbers suggest, partly because of the huge wallop of torque so low down, but also because of the noise. It really is a key part in the transformation from relatively humble ST to altogether more meaningful RS. The same can’t quite be said about the gearchange, unfortunately, which is shorter and sharper than the ST’s but not short or sharp enough to do the rest of the drivetrain justice.

On the other hand, the chassis more than makes up for this most minor of issues. With the previous RS Ford may have dropped a whoopsy on the finance front, but it also made one of the sharpest handling front-wheel-drive cars there has ever been. It has gone at least one, if not two steps better this time round.

The way the RS puts its grunt down is truly incredible, but beyond that it’s also a lovely car to hussle along a good road. The steering is just delicious in the way it telegraphs so clearly what’s happening beneath the fat Continental front tyres. Yet it’s what happens at the other end of the car that provides you with the biggest confidence booster. The way in which the car neither under nor oversteers, but just hangs on is, well, breathtaking.

Should I buy one?

In a word, yes. Remortgage the house, rob a bank, sell yourself, sell your own grandmother, just do whatever it takes to put an RS on your drive. Because it really is one of those cars.

Join the debate

Comments
117
Add a comment…
icsunonove 25 September 2009

Re: Ford Focus RS

beachland2 wrote:
show me the official lap times.

http://www.fastestlaps.com/track2.html

I reckon the Audi TT-S to be the fastest of what I call VW-derivatives. That said, if we include the TT-RS as well into the VW-pack, that will be be quicker than a Focus RS around the Nordschleife. But there's no official lap time for that at the moment. And maybe somewhere you have to start consider the very different price tags.

I'm not saying that the Focus RS is the best in ever discipline. Because its not. I'm just saying that for being a usable hot hatch (like the Audi S3) its not exactly slow. Of course the Focus RS is cheap looking like a prostitute and whatever, but it goes.


beachland2 24 September 2009

Re: Ford Focus RS

icsunonove wrote:
Ageed.
However quicker around the Nürburgring than all the VW derivatives

thats bull, show me the official lap times.

zipps 24 September 2009

Re: Ford Focus RS

Tom 3000 wrote:

People far more frequently can do 0-30/40/50/60 without risk. This is much more exciting anyway. 30-70 is just analogous to "speeding up" - ok, it's reasonably exciting but not as thrilling as a zero start (so many variables from zero, not just torque). Plus zero starts require more driver thought and skill than just "flooring" at 30 to 70. Flooring 100% from zero is not always the fastest method. Also much more testing in this countries wet or icy conditions from zero.

Zero starts not being "real world" smack a little bit of referring to cars that don't cope well with zero starts (making excuses) or cars that struggle in non-perfect conditions (e.g. wet, ice, imperfect). Every day we all do zero starts, not necessarily 30-70.

Think we'll have to disagree on this! On my last 20 minute trip I needed to stop completely - at junctions - five times. Each time I could not have accelerated onto the roundbout or from the junction to anything more than 30mph if I had wanted to - and I wouldn't because it would not have been safe to do so and because flooring it from 0, whilst fun, is a recipe for knackered tyres and drivetrain.

During that 20 minutes there were 19 minutes worth of opportunity to accelerate / overtake / slow and do it all over again. Whether it's 20-40, 30-50, 40-60, 60-70 (of course anything faster would be naughty!), even 30-70 or any other similar "block" the RS is quicker. The breakdown stats in Performance Car, Autoexpress & Autocar all say so.

Find an Autocar car review