Currently reading: Matt Prior's tester's notes - Ariel's Nomad has me smitten
Ok, so the bank balance won't quite stretch to a full-blown Ariel Nomad - so I've bought the next best thing

Doctor, I have a problem. It’s almost a month since I drove an Ariel Nomad and I’m still obsessed. I lie awake at night wondering whether, if I sold this, pawned that, gave up the other, I could afford one. Just for a while.

Just so that its remarkable driving characteristics were always waiting at the end of the garden. So that any time I brought a needlessly crashy, thumpy-riding car home from work, I could wheel out the Nomad and it would make it all better.

But more than that: I can’t stop thinking that the Nomad’s suspension points to a different way. Perhaps a better way. A way where compliant suspension is cherished and nurtured, where a car’s body movements are not just allowed but encouraged. Where dips, crests, potholes and road lumps are isolated from a car’s cabin yet it remains brilliantly composed and perfectly damped.

The more I think about the Nomad – and I think about it a lot – the more I sound like a deranged evangelist for a cause that’s noble but unviable. The Nomad is, I should accept, an exception. It sits alongside sandrail buggies and specialist rally cars in having a wonderfully limited brief: to provide great fun on any terrain.

And its mechanical complexion reflects that. This is a car that weighs only 670kg, so it’s feasible to give it chunky tyres and pliant springs and dampers without its body slipping way out of control.

Try the same with 2.2 tonnes of Porsche Cayenne and see how that goes. Or any car whose body-in-white weighs about as much as an entire Nomad. Simple physics dictates that you’ll be needing stiffer springs, stickier dampers and lower tyre sidewalls if you want to prevent the whole caboodle from heaving and rolling like Homer Simpson’s stomach. Cars are fat.

Okay, they’re getting lighter, but cars, generally, are still plump because we like them that way. We like thick, soft interior surfaces and powerful engines and audio and communications systems and comfortable seats and space for the dog. Yet we also still expect a decent driver’s car and some composure. Soft suspension doesn’t fit that brief.

I fear, then, that the Nomad’s compliance, which I hoped might become some kind of template, will instead remain a wonderful exception. Perhaps that’s okay: the Nomad will just exist, be wonderful and maybe spawn interest in light all-terrain cars.

I’ve just bought one. In the absence of a Nomad, I’ve got a 
1972 Volkswagen Baja Beetle, not a lot over 800kg, at the end of the garden. I’m hoping it’ll satisfy my obsession, or the 
pets go up for sale.

Get the latest car news, reviews and galleries from Autocar direct to your inbox every week. Enter your email address below:

Back to top

Join the debate

Add a comment…
AHA1 15 May 2015

Loved the Nomad review - thanks!

Basically it sounds like the four wheeled equivalent of a supermoto motorbike: off-road suspension mated to aggressive geometry, extreme lightweight and a peppy, free-revving powerplant (single cylinder usually, 2-stroke an option.)

A package designed for dangerous amounts of fun, with illegality almost an inevitability. Hilarious, absolutely love it. Enjoy.

Wonder if we'll ever see a Nomad-based racer at the Dakar? Someone call Robby Gordon!

Marv 15 May 2015

I really love the Nomad

If I was able to buy one, I'd have to wear a sleeveless leather jacket and leather pants just to complete the Mad Max look!! :-)
flingstam 15 May 2015

Also, was the NMD number

Also, was the NMD number plate a happy coincidence, or a nod to the car you really wanted? :)