Currently reading: Porsche vs. Livingstone: round 2
Porsche poll shows that 74 per cent of Londoners don't want the new charge

Porsche is turning up the heat in its battle with London mayor Ken Livingstone's proposed £25-a-day congestion charge, releasing polling data that shows a majority of Londoners think the increased charge is too high - and demanding that Livingstone releases the poll that he conducted on the same topic.The proposed increase in the charge from £8 to £25 for cars that emit over 225 g/km will affect almost every model in Porsche's current line-up, and the company has gone on the offensive in recent weeks to make it's point.According to Porsche's poll, conducted by ICM, 74 per cent of Londoners believe the increase in the Congestion Charge is too high, 62 per cent believe the increase is being brought in to raise revenue rather than protect the environment and 81 percent believe the increase will be bad for business in London.But Porsche is also challenging Livingstone to release data from a poll conducted in December, which the mayor claimed showed support for his proposed plans. In a letter to the mayor, Porsche GB managing director Andy Goss said: “I am requesting that you finally release the full tables of the Ipsos-Mori poll you announced in a news release on 18 December 2007… If you are unwilling, for whatever reason, to authorise Ipsos-Mori to make these tables public, Porsche Cars requests that you remove the 18 December news release from your website and that you make no further references to the polling in your public comments.” It's an area where Livingstone seems to have previous history. He is also accused by the bikers' organisations for holding back a survey that is claimed to show a marked decrease in accidents and injuries if motorbikes are allowed to use bus lanes.

Join the debate

Comments
8
Add a comment…
Jaggie 3 March 2008

Re: Porsche vs. Livingstone: round 2

phenergn wrote:
Tax maybe, but not a stealth tax.

It is a stealth tax because it's hidden behind a green agenda and called a 'green tax' when its really designed to fill Ken's coffers!

He's like Tony Bliar with his lies!

Jaggie 3 March 2008

Re: Porsche vs. Livingstone: round 2

davidh88220 wrote:
I think Porsche has finally mentioned what everyone else has been thinking - the proposed rise in C-Charge is simply a means to grab more money from the motorist with no, or so it seems, benefits for those whom pay it.

Just more money grabbing ideas from our old communist Ken and his Con Charge!

A stealth tax, not a 'Green tax', and don't motorists pay for emmissions anyway with fuel duty. Out with Communists!

I think 80p fuel duty should be enough!

I'd like to see what Ken drives!

Simon Wells 26 February 2008

Re: Porsche vs. Livingstone: round 2

As Mr Spock frequently pointed out.