Has Toyota made this revised Auris interesting to drive?

What is it?

This is the facelifted Toyota Auris, which has undergone some mechanical tweaks and minor visual changes to bring it in line with the latest Toyota look.

Exterior changes include a new front and rear bumper design, including integrated fog lamps, new headlamps, a revised bonnet and a new style of grille.

Inside, more soft-touch materials have been used across the top of the instrument binnacle and around the glovebox and the centre console has been redesigned.

Additional standard kit includes a USB port and Aux-in socket, and a leather flat-bottomed steering wheel.

Perhaps more importantly, Toyota says that the suspension damping has been retuned to improve its ride and handling on UK roads. It also says the power steering has also been revised and refined to deliver better feedback and improved vehicle agility.

Both the engine line-up and trim levels have been simplified; buyers can choose from 1.33-litre and 1.6-litre petrols and a 1.4-litre diesel, and three spec levels, T2, TR and SR.

Here, we test the 89bhp diesel in mid-range TR trim, linked to the MultiMode automated manual transmission.

What’s it like?

The Auris has always been solidly good without matching class leaders such as the VW Golf for quality and refinement or Ford Focus for driver involvement. That much hasn’t changed.

However, the facelifted Auris is a more compelling proposition than it was. The steering still lacks a little feel, but is more engaging and direct than before.

Judging the suspension damping changes on smooth Spanish roads is less easy. The car retains its MacPherson strut front and torsion beam rear set-up, but it coped well with expansion joints on motorways and rode rippled surfaces better than ever before.

The 1.4 diesel engine has just enough power to pull the Auris along briskly enough to keep up with motorway traffic, and is torquey enough to be mildly entertaining on flowing roads. However, while it cruises quietly, it is a little coarse under acceleration.

It’s economical, though, recording 58.9mpg and emitting 127g/km of CO2 with MultiMode – only mildly worse than the manual version, which hits 60.1mpg and 125g/km.

However, the MultiMode transmission is no more than adequate in manual mode and downright slow to change in automatic mode. As such, it does nothing to enhance the driving experience.

The Auris’s cabin is enhanced by the latest modifications, but only marginally. It always was a nice place to be, and the changes add a small degree of comfort. The TR trim level makes financial sense, adding kit including 16-inch alloys, climate control, front fog lights, and electric rear windows to base spec for around £700.

It also remains a hugely practical cabin. There’s plenty of driving position adjustment, the seats offer decent support and there’s a tiny bit more storage space than before. It also benefits from having a flat rear floor, giving back seat occupants more room and making carrying three small people in the back a realistic proposition over reasonable distances.

Back to top

Should I buy one?

The Auris continues to have plenty of decent attributes, but no great ones.

On the plus side it’s reasonable to drive, economical to own, ticks all the safety boxes (including the once-pioneering driver’s knee airbag), is spacious and loaded with storage cubbies and is backed up by Toyota’s excellent dealer network. The fact it is built in Britain has also helped avoid price fluctuations that have befallen rivals, adding to its appeal.

On the downside, it remains anonymous to look at and own and it doesn’t match the class best in terms of refinement or driver involvement.

As a result, whether you want an Auris depends on your priorities. What’s more, while this engine is adequate, you’d have to cover a lot of miles to justify buying the diesel, and the MultiMode transmission is best avoided.

Join the debate

Add a comment…
Mr_H 24 February 2010

Re: Toyota Auris 1.4 D-4D MultiMode

I'm not going to jump on the Toyota brake/accelerator pedal fiasco bandwagon, but I will say that I had the previous Auris for 2 weeks as a hire-car when mine was being repaired. It was a 2.0 Diesel. It was competent, comfortable, roomy and well equipped. It was also completely soulless, dull beyond comprehension, had the most stupidly designed interior (what is that odd gear-lever position all about?), fussy instruments, and I kept losing it in the office car-park. I was so pleased to get my 8 yr old car back - if this car represents the modern face of motoring, I'd rather live in the past! Sorry Toyota, no matter how good your reliability ratings are, there's absolutely no way you'll ever entice me into your show-rooms (I also had a Yaris hire car once, and wanted to slit my wrists after a week of 'driving' that!).

jcmr2 23 February 2010

Re: Toyota Auris 1.4 D-4D MultiMode

Toyota make excellent cars. I have had all makes of cars over the years, and Toyota have always been the best. I currently own a 2002 Porsche 996 and a 1989 MR2. Every time i take the Porsche out i am worried about something breaking, not so the MR2 loads of fun and totally dependable , not like the 996. This anti Toyota thing is being driven by the yanks to bolster there own sales. Who owns the american car companys?

VX220EDDIE 23 February 2010

Re: Toyota Auris 1.4 D-4D MultiMode

boring ugly and brakes are an option (sorry,couldnt resist)