BMW adds its new 2.0-litre turbo petrol engine to its X3 line-up; X5 M Sport revised
17 February 2012

BMW has equipped its BMW X3 SUV with its new ‘TwinPower’ turbocharged 2.0-litre petrol engine. The 242bhp four-cylinder unit will be available in the X3 xDrive28i from spring 2012.

The engine, which also features in the 3-series and Z4, produces 258lb ft of torque between 1250-4800rpm. It helps propel the X3 xDrive28i from 0-62mph in 6.7sec.

BMW has also launched a revised M Sport package for its larger BMW X5 SUV. The M Sport package is available on all engine options and features 20in alloys, an exterior bodykit, xenon adaptive cornering headlights and a new M Sport suspension set-up.

Inside, M Sport-equipped X5s get a leather-clad M Sport steering wheel with shift paddles, individual anthracite roof lining, individual interior trim strips, M logo doorsills, stainless steel pedals and an M footrest for the driver. The M Sport edition also includes electrically adjustable sports seats.

Katie Hayes

Join the debate

Comments
6

19 February 2012

Should be a good alternative to the diesels if it works as well in the X3 as it does in the F30 3-series.

19 February 2012

That engine would be more interesting in the X1, but it's not a 2.8!

19 February 2012

[quote J400uk]Should be a good alternative to the diesels if it works as well in the X3 as it does in the F30 3-series.[/quote]

It will be interesting to see if this engine takes more than 5% of X3 sales in the UK.

19 February 2012

[quote Fidji] but it's not a 2.8![/quote] All manufacturers commit such inaccuracies and it's really annoying. My car for instance is a 1.781 litre, but they insist on calling it a 1.8.

Drives me mad!

 

19 February 2012

[quote Leslie Brook]My car for instance is a 1.781 litre, but they insist on calling it a 1.8.[/quote]

Well said!

Really, who cares? 328 with a 2.8 or a 2.0: Not important. As long as you know it's place in the pecking order; that is all the badge is designed to do. Time moves on, so should we.

20 February 2012

True, the actual capacity is unimportant, but what is a crying shame is the loss of two cylinders. No 4 pot turbo will ever sound as ravishing to the soul as a straight six. But in every other way there's not much in it, so here's to the future?

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq
  • Audi Q7 e-tron
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Expensive and flawed but this understated diesel-electric Audi Q7 has a lot to offer
  • Citroën C3
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Is the third gen Citroën C3 ‘fresh and different’ enough to take on its supermini rivals? We spend six months with one to find out
  • BMW X3
    First Drive
    15 October 2017
    A satisfying rework of the X3 that usefully improves its handling, cabin finish, space and connectivity to make this BMW a class front-runner again
  • Vauxhall Insignia Country Tourer
    First Drive
    13 October 2017
    Off-road estate is now bigger, more spacious and available with torque-vectoring all-wheel drive, but is it enough to make its German rivals anxious?