New big Aston doesn’t try to be the biggest, fastest SUV on the block, and may be all the more appealing and successful for it

It has been a challenging fifteen months for Aston Martin Lagonda Global Holdings plc since the company took its ‘second century’ business expansion plan public on the London stock exchange.

I’d imagine a stock market analyst would probably choose a word other than ‘challenging’ to describe it, in fact; one preceded, perhaps, with an even more colourful term beginning with the letter ‘b’ or ‘f’.

The truth is, Aston’s stocks have yet to really become buoyant at all. They’ve been taking on water steadily since an ambitious debut at £19-a-share in October 2018, and rallied briefly over Christmas, but sat at a new low of £3.86-a-piece as these words were written. Painful stuff indeed. Although a change in ownership structure is rumoured to be close, the floatation experiment must now be weighing on the company’s balance sheet like a 20-stone life preserver resting not-so-lightly around the neck.

Conveniently, the car that may be the company’s saviour is almost ready to enter the fray – and how urgently it is needed. The DBX is the new big second-century Aston. A four-door, five-metre, 542bhp ‘super-SUV’ of a contentious kind, it’s not likely to be welcomed by critics and commentators across the board – although, by my reckoning, it probably should be. And few at Gaydon will care in any case if it reproduces even a proportion of the commercial success of the Lamborghini Urus, Bentley Bentayga or Porsche Cayenne, and becomes the stabilizing and transformative influence that Andy Palmer and his team are quietly but squarely depending on.

The DBX is not a car that seems so fundamentally alike to those polarizing fast and expensive 4x4s in the metal, actually. Aston invited us to its new factory in St Athan, South Wales, for a first drive which came courtesy of a mid-stage production prototype in a low-profile-keeping dark colour and with some very light disguise. The sight of it quickly confirmed that this car might very well change opinions about how excessive and objectionable big, powerful, exotically positioned SUVs must necessarily be.

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

It’s just over five metres long; longer therefore than a Porsche Cayenne or a Range Rover Sport, but shorter than a Bentayga or an Urus. But being long-in-the-wheelbase and lower-roofed than many of its SUV rivals, it doesn’t looks its size somehow - being also rakish and tapering, with a relatively low bonnet height. I’d risk putting it on record, in fact, that it’s much closer to compact- and elegant-looking than ever I thought a car like this might get. It’s also not overwrought or aggressive-looking – at all. While I appreciate that recording as much will open me up to ridicule by a great many people who haven’t laid eyes on the car at all, to my eyes the DBX looks like a handsome modern Aston – and, considering its necessary size and proportions, that’s quite something.

Under the aluminium and composite body panels it’s built around an all-new aluminium ‘platform’ chassis, the cost of which (combined with that of establishing the factory building it) has made the car an unusually sizable investment. It carries over very little from Aston’s wider model range, powered instead by a 4.0-litre turbo V8 sourced from Mercedes-AMG but not quite the same one that you’ll find in the Vantage and DB11. It’s effectively the same motor that appears in a Mercedes-AMG E63 S super saloon, and it comes packaged with the same ‘active’ four-wheel drive system and torque-vectoring rear differential as that car uses.

Where its driveline makeup differs from that of the hot E-Class is for a gearbox; where the Merc uses a seven-speed multi-clutch gearbox for faster shifts and greater outright torque capacity (and other modern Astons use a ZF eight-speed auto, of course), the DBX uses Mercedes’ nine-speed torque-converter automatic ‘box for smoother changes – and importantly so that Aston could engineer-in the near-three-tonne towing capacity and the low-speed torque multiplication that it knew some DBX owners would want. Using the nine-speed box also meant that Aston had to limit engine torque to a peak 516lb ft – but with an updated gearbox of greater torque capacity apparently in the pipeline, and given that we already know how much more torque that engine can produce, there may well be more grunt to come in the not-too-distant future.

Suspension is via four-chamber air suspension that can be adjusted for both spring rate and ride height, with adaptive Bilstein dampers and 48-volt ‘roll-cancelling’ active anti-roll bars. Two-out-of-those-three technologies have never been adopted by any Aston Martin before, but they’re pretty standard fare amongst the cars with which the DBX must compete – and so Aston Martin development guru Matt Becker and his team decided early on that the car would have ‘em. Ride height can be adjusted through almost 100mm of travel in total.

What the DBX doesn’t have, interestingly, is four-wheel steering – and not by chance, as Becker explained from the passenger seat during our test drive. “We’ve ‘protected’ four-wheel steering for the car, so we can use it later if we feel it’s necessary,” says Becker, “and I appreciate what it can do for a car like this on low-speed agility and outright lateral grip. But, honestly, I just don’t like the effect it can have on steering and cornering behaviour. Too often I find myself having to ‘steer’ cars that have 4WS several times on the way around a corner, because they can be over-responsive and a bit unpredictable generally. And we really wanted the DBX to feel natural, intuitive; easy to place.”

It’s not a stretch up to get into the DBX, and it’s not a car most will need to duck to enter either. You sit more recumbently than in most SUVs, and feel more enclosed because of the high windowline, the slim glasshouse and the fairly ‘fast’ windscreen angle – but also because door panels wrap reasonably closely around your outboard elbow.

The rich, enveloping cabin has a more cosy feel than you’re expecting, then – but it’s also usefully roomy. There’s plenty space for bigger adults in the back, while Aston claims 632 litres of boot space. It’s certainly a cargo bay of a very good size, and looks like it ought to swallow bulky objects like pushchairs, golf bags and dog boxes with space to spare. There will be more practical SUVs I dare say, but the DBX ought to do very well for people who’ve been waiting for genuinely usable, comfortable and versatile four-seater from Aston Martin.

Despite its only medium-high hip point and rakish screen, the car offers good forward visibility thanks to its lowish scuttle – and because you can see the front corners of bodywork directly above the front wheels, it’s easy to judge the car’s size on the road and it doesn’t feel any larger than it needs to.

When you’re using the car’s most laid-back and comfortable ‘GT’ driving mode, you’d characterize the ride and handling in similar terms to those of the last four-door GT that Aston made, the likable Rapide S. It’s a very comfortable car and a reasonably well isolated one too, even on 22in rims. The difference from the Rapide experience here is, of course, that that everything happens at a foot of greater altitude from the surface of the road.

There is no doubt that, despite of its greater bulk and raised body profile, the DBX becomes tauter, quicker and more agile than the Rapide ever was when you put it into ‘Sport’ and ‘Sport+’ modes, as it squats over its wheels, gathers its powers of body control and responsiveness and takes on plenty of convincing sporting purpose. That’s perhaps the most meaningful dynamic compliment I can pay the car, and the team behind it; that it develops and improves the capacities of the four-door Aston at once to perform, to engage, to handle and simply to comfortably and agreeably transport, in apparently opposite dimensions all at the same time.

Performance is very serious indeed and nicely flexible throughout the rev range, but not brutal or savage like you’ll find in an Urus in full cry – just as the DBX’s 4.5sec 0-62mph claim would suggest. Aston wanted the car to be class-leading for handling balance and steering, as Becker explained, and was content for it to be ‘among the best’ for acceleration and ride isolation – and, broadly, that’s how it seems. Although the ride is cushioned and fluent in all but ‘Sport+’ mode and over all but the nastiest surfaces, sharper lumps and bumps in the tarmac do clunk through into the cockpit just a little bit.

Steering, however, is natural-feeling, ideally weighted and linear in its pace at all times; and handling is ever-predictable and intuitive, and secure yet balanced and poised, making the DBX surprisingly composed, controlled and agile for such a big, tall car. It’s even more fun on loose offroad surfaces (see sidebars), as some rallycross-style gravel cornering at the Walters Arena very vividly demonstrated.

All up, the Aston Martin DBX makes quite the first impression, then: one of a car that’s smaller and more outwardly appealing, sweeter-to-drive and just a little bit more of a moderate than you expected it to be. One of a super-SUV, and whisper this, that’s been carefully considered in its design and positioning, and configured with just a little bit of willingness to judiciously compromise. And what a turn up that is.

OFFROAD: how does the DBX deal with gravel, mud, rocks and deep water?

Walters Arena, near Merthyr Tydfil, granted a chance to find out how the DBX might handle wet gravel, mud and rocks, and some deep standing water. Much as few owners of a near-£200,000 car would ever be likely to find out with their own purchases, it handles all very capably indeed.

The car’s air suspension and active anti-roll bars are apparently key in producing the chassis’ ability to stay level and to rotate into corners when you select ‘Sport+’ driving mode. So explains Matt Becker as you approach a wide gravel bend in 3rd gear, then throw the car’s nose into the apex on a trailing throttle and feel the rear pivot benignly wide as its rear-axle roll stiffness peaks. The car’s mid-corner handling adjustability is better off the throttle than on it; the driveline allows you to maintain a neutral attitude easily but will more often pull the car straight with lots of power than allow you greater slip angle. Still, it’s huge fun to slide about in.

At much lower speed, some wading is possible (max depth is 500mm), while the DBX will crawl over smaller rocks easily enough, although its offroad modes could provide a more progressive throttle pedal map.

On 22in wheels and mid-range all-season tyres (winter tyres and performance tyres will also be available) there was decent enough traction on mud for fairly steep climbs and decents, with standard-fit electronic Hill Descent Control helping on the latter. Outright offroad capability clearly isn’t what the DBX is about – and more clearly still, it needn’t be. What owners are likely to ask of it, however, it seems quite ready to cope with.

Matt Saunders

...and how does it deal with the desert? by Mike Duff

So after Wales in the rain, the less relevant question of how well the DBX deals with the desert of Oman. I got to fly out in December to experience a same-generation prototype to the one we drove in the UK, on a route that included more than 100km of gravel and dirt.

On tarmac the DBX’s native rearward torque bias only becomes obvious under faster progress, but on the loose it is always heavily evident. Even in the car’s default GT mode it is clear that most effort is heading to the back axle, with the electronically controlled biasing differential then helping the car to turn by overspeeding the outside wheel. The upshot on longer, faster corners is a modest but discernable yaw angle that the car both achieves and seems to hold by itself.

Of course, that’s just where the bidding starts, with the more aggressive Sport and Sport Plus dynamic modes increasing both the car’s natural angle of attack and also increasing the intervention threshold of the stability control. But even with this switched fully off – at Becker’s suggestion – the DBX stayed both stable and adjustable on sweeping gravel corners, although the suddenness with which the AMG V8’s torque peak arrives required some respectful throttle technique.

While all this was hugely fun, the DBX’s suspension impressed more. The combination of speed and big bumps is one that few road cars can comfortably deal with, a point made by the heaving ride of Aston’s Toyota Land Cruiser support vehicle as it followed behind. Yet the DBX’s combination of generous suspension travel and pillowy air springs enabled it to digest rough surfaces amazingly well, taking ruts that would get me bracing for impact without effort. The active 48 Volt anti-roll can still be felt working on slippery surfaces, the extent to which it cancels lean immediately obvious when the prototype’s system failed, turning the Aston’s speedboat impression into one of a bulk carrier. A stop-and-start reset got it working again.

Adjustable ride height is another of the air suspension’s neat tricks. I didn’t do any serious rock scrambling, but the ability to add up to 45mm to ride height in Terrain Plus adds reassurance when maneuvering over sharp rocks.

Becker cheerfully admits that the DBX is better off-road than his team expected it to be: “we aimed for Allroad and we got a Cayenne.” While few owners are likely to take it far from tarmac, there’s an undoubted reassurance in knowing it is capable of so much more.

Aston Martin DBX specification

Where Rhondda, Wales; and Oman Price £158,000 On sale April 2020 Engine 3982cc, V8, twin-turbocharged petrol Power 542bhp at 6500rpm Torque 516lb ft at 2200-5000rpm Gearbox 9-spd automatic; 4WD Kerb weight 2245kg Top speed 181mph 0-62mph 4.5sec Fuel economy 19.7mpg (WLTP Combined) CO2 WLTP figures unavailable Rivals Lamborghini Urus, Bentley Bentayga V8

READ MORE

Aston Martin DBX: pricing confirmed from £158,000​

First ride: 2020 Aston Martin DBX prototype

New Aston Martin DBX: 542bhp SUV charged with reviving firm

Join the debate

Comments
13

15 January 2020
I like the look of this and hope it does well

15 January 2020
But not terrific either.

Some people bought the Porsche Cayenne because it looked like a 911 that you could carry your children in. They really wanted the sports car, but they needed the practicality. Therefore, a good sports car helps sales of your SUV.

Aston doesn't have that with the Vantage. It's a design even they have blamed for poor corporate results.

What has Aston done? Continued with the development of the roadster version!

CEO Andy Palmer can't see that ever design by Marek Reichman has failed to deliver and are getting worse and worse. He's betting Aston's future on a designer who has failed.

If Andy Palmer can't see this then he has to go too.

To save Aston it's not the DBX that's needed. It's a new designer to bring the desirability back to Aston.

16 January 2020
Of all the faux-wheel-drives (i.e. not Land Cruisers, Patrols or Jeeps) this looks by far the best IMO. I don't understand the appeal of fake 4WDs - I'd get a Land Cruiser / Patrol and a sedan or wagon if I had the cash for one of these - but clearly many do and, if I had to have one, it would definitely be the DBX. Aston's current range looks superb, a brilliantly progressive evolution of the already beautiful previous generation, and this DBX takes that flair for proportion and detail and applies it to a high riding wagon with sufficiently skillful execution that it actually looks good. 9/10!

15 January 2020

Its time this once great brand was put out of its misery, after years of cars that pretty much all look the same, now half of them havent even got proper Aston engines and then we get this horrid fake SUV cr*p. Nothing could bore me more, apart maybe from Porsches.

15 January 2020
typos1 wrote:

Its time this once great brand was put out of its misery, after years of cars that pretty much all look the same, now half of them havent even got proper Aston engines and then we get this horrid fake SUV cr*p. Nothing could bore me more, apart maybe from Porsches.

15 January 2020

I'm in the hate-that-Aston-is doing-an-SUV camp, especially since this could -- and should -- be a Lagonda. But it's here, so I hope it does well enough to do its job financially. That said...

I'm glad to hear that initial impressions are favorable. Obviously I haven't driven it, but I have driven the Rapide, which is genuinely superb to drive and handles extremely well. I find it very difficult to believe that the DBX is "tauter" and "more agile" than the excellent Rapide S. Too often the motoring press inaccurately and unnecessarily denigrates a previous model in an effort to show how good the new one is. I'm willing to be convinced otherwise, but it's highly unlikely.

Typos1, how about doing right by Aston rather than "putting it out of its misery"? I completely agree about non-Aston engines -- that's an absolute deal-breaker for me -- and I don't love the current designs. However, the strong criticism that for years they "made cars that pretty much all look the same" doesn't make any sense to me. Apparently, that Astons looked similar to each other is the only "criticism" that could be aimed at the previous generation cars -- IMO they were, and still are, stunningly beautiful cars, among the best-looking cars made in the last 50 years. I've never had any difficulty distinguishing the different models anyway, but even if some people do, when they're that gorgeous, why is it such a big deal if they looked similar??? 

15 January 2020
Speedraser wrote:

Apparently, that Astons looked similar to each other is the only "criticism" that could be aimed at the previous generation cars -- IMO they were, and still are, stunningly beautiful cars, among the best-looking cars made in the last 50 years. I've never had any difficulty distinguishing the different models anyway, but even if some people do, when they're that gorgeous, why is it such a big deal if they looked similar???

Exactly. They all looked superb.

As for looking the same, I can't tell one Audi from another. Porsche tweaks their designs, not radically changing them.

16 January 2020
Speedraser wrote:

Typos1, how about doing right by Aston rather than "putting it out of its misery"? I completely agree about non-Aston engines -- that's an absolute deal-breaker for me -- and I don't love the current designs. However, the strong criticism that for years they "made cars that pretty much all look the same" doesn't make any sense to me. Apparently, that Astons looked similar to each other is the only "criticism" that could be aimed at the previous generation cars -- IMO they were, and still are, stunningly beautiful cars, among the best-looking cars made in the last 50 years. I've never had any difficulty distinguishing the different models anyway, but even if some people do, when they're that gorgeous, why is it such a big deal if they looked similar??? 

Ok, doing right would be good, but I wonder - just as I do with Citroen - whether that will ever happen and that maybe its better to kill it now rather than watch its agonising death throes. Looks are subjective, so we re all entitled to out own opinions on them, but I would in no way say any Aston was "stunningly beautiful", just very boring and very similar to the last one. As for it being a big deal if they all look the same, well most people dont like that sort of thing and from a sales perspective - whos gonna buy the more expensive ones when they can get the same looks for less with the cheaper model ? Not a very sustainable way for a company to go on as the way things are panning out for Aston is proving.

15 January 2020

this isnt the new Ford Puma.. 

15 January 2020
I'm struggling to see how a £150000+ school run SUV will be enough to save a financially strapped company - this will be a fantasticly expensive vehicle to maintain, from a company struggling. Doesn't look like a good place to put cash no matter how good it is.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week