Matt Saunders
22 February 2013

What is it?

The all-new Toyota RAV4. With the car’s 20th anniversary approaching next year, Toyota made much of its status as self-proclaimed founding father of the modern monocoque-based compact SUV at the launch of this, the fourth-generation car. From behind the wheel, however, it’s not instantly obvious if that status is more a blessing or a curse.

One of Europe’s few remaining growth segments, the compact 4x4 market must look like a bewildering place to the makers of 1994's original, three-door ‘Recreational Activity Vehicle’. Over the past two decades, as buyers have moved out of family saloons and into these ‘lifestyle’ utility specialists, so choice has burgeoned. You can now have seven-seat practicality, sporting dynamics, fashion-savvy style or premium brand cachet for the price of this new Toyota. None of which the RAV4 has ever had an answer to, and all of which continue to be unknown to it.

Old-school, rough-and-rugged, ready-for-anything 4x4 character has been Toyota’s reply to all that. The trick has worked quite well to give this soft-roader a distinctive selling point thus far. But Toyota knew even that wouldn’t give this car enough to trade on in 2013.

So it has parachuted the new RAV4 plumb into the middle of a fragmented class that, as Toyota sees it, has the likes of the Nissan Qashqai and Mitsubishi ASX at one end and the BMW X3 and Range Rover Evoque at the other. If you plot a graph comparing the price and overall length of every small and medium-size 4x4 you can think of – from the Hyundai iX35 to the Audi Q5 – this new Toyota marks the very centre, the sweet spot. That’s where the Japanese firm expects the most demand for SUVs to exist over the next five years.  

But is that where a RAV4 belongs?

What is it like?

Wieldiness was always something the RAV4 did well. It’s never been a big, cumbersome car; in fact, it used to be shorter than a modern supermini. And Toyota’s own market research confirms that owners still value its relative manoeuvrability.

This new one has had 100mm added to the wheelbase, though, and 205mm in overall length. It’s much more practical for it, of course, and it now measures up as a proper medium-sized SUV on the inside. Toyota also claims its 10.6-metre turning circle is still class-leading. But it’s also, somehow, lost a bit of its individuality. 

Outwardly, to these eyes, the car looks very ‘modern Toyota’, but not very ‘modern RAV4’. You can blame some of that on the stretched proportions. The rear end in particularl looks ungainly and odd, and a couple of trademark RAV4 cues are missing here: the door-mounted spare wheel, not to mention the side-hinged rear door it mounted to in years gone by. Toyota says a roof-hinged hatchback makes more practical sense, and it’s probably right. But there goes another identifying point of difference.

Inside, the RAV4’s upright classic SUV driving position was next in line for the chop. You can now sit up to 30mm lower than you could. That puts you closer to the centre of roll, which ought to be a good thing, but somehow it makes the RAV4 experience that bit more humdrum: less Range Rover, more StreetRover.

The cabin is pleasant, roomy and apparently solidly constructed, although it lacks much in the way of flair. The plastics look and feel impressive. We could live without the fake leather on the steering wheel boss and the mock carbo fibre on the centre console, but such things are subjective. 

Toyota’s approach to ergonomic switchgear design is doubtless more troubling, though. The RAV4’s drive mode buttons, which you use regularly to switch between Sport and Eco modes, are hidden away almost out of sight by your right knee. it's not an easy place to spot them without taking your eyes off the road for very long. Its lane departure warning toggle button is the stretch of your arm away on the far side of the centre stack, while the digital clock next to it brings your granny’s microwave oven to mind – a simple, plain analogue clock would be infinitely classier. Strange that a company with such attention to detail in other respects can make basic errors such as these, but it continues to.

There are 2.0-litre four-wheel drive petrol, 2.0-litre front-drive turbodiesel and 2.2-litre four-wheel drive turbodiesel versions of the new car on offer, the latter with six-speed manual or automatic transmissions. Our test car was a range-topping 148bhp 2.2-litre AWD auto.

It had good mechanical refinement, plenty of mid-range torque and an elastic-feeling gearbox well calibrated to take advantage of that easy pulling power. This is an easy car to drive. Performance felt bang-on the class average, as the 10sec to 62mph claim would suggest. Economy was likewise, with a return of just over 35mpg in mixed use.

The RAV4’s ride is less settled, though, and handling id less responsive and precise than some family 4x4s. That may be exactly how Toyota’s long-retained customer base wants it, but it’s unlikely to endear the car to many youngsters.

It’s neat and tidy to drive at everyday speeds, with less body roll and related roll steer than of old. But it doesn’t change direction keenly. Off-centre steering weight is used to mask early onset understeer. 

Push through that and you’ll soon trip over an intrusive stability control system, particularly if you try to cut through the dynamic mush originating from its high-sidewall tyres and long-travel springs in order to find a nicely balanced cornering line. So many similarly sized SUVs disguise their mass and height better; so many just make you feel like you could be driving any old passenger car.

Should I buy one?

This new RAV4 is no athlete. Neither is it compliant nor particularly comfy to ride in. But it’s not lacking in motive flavour – far from it. The beefy-feeling, lightly jostling damper settings speak of a strong, over-specified rolling chassis that’s just itching to prove its worth down a rutted trail.

In reality, the RAV4 may be no better off-road than many of its rivals, but it feels like it ought to be. And if you like a capable, reassuring feel to your 4x4, you may well respond to that.

Just don’t be fooled by it. There are plenty of new, sub-£30k 4x4s rated to tow more than this new Toyota, and many of them have more ground clearance. But if it’s chiefly rugged flavour you’re looking for, you could well find something you like here. The new RAV4 has quality, practicality, mechanical refinement and decent value for money on its side – but it’s definitely a more traditional kind of SUV in which a bit of rough still comes with the smooth.

Toyota RAV4 2.2 D-CAT 150 Invincible

Price £29,295; 0-62mph 10.0sec; Top speed 115mph; Economy 42.2mpg; CO2 176g/km; Kerb weight 1660kg; Engine 4 cyls, 2231cc, turbodiesel; Installation Front, transverse, 4WD; Power 148bhp at 3600rpm; Torque 251lb ft at 2000-2800rpm; Gearbox 6-spd automatic

Join the debate

Comments
13

On looks alone this car could

16 weeks 5 days ago

On looks alone this car could be from any manufacturer, its just more of the same at the moment. And there's that funny digital clock again!

I still see some of the original, compact RAV4s on the road, and I think they look great. Nobody does a vehicle like that any more apart from perhaps Suzuki, but I don't think the Grand Vitara is that long for this world. As a single person I could be tempted by a compact 3 door SUV, but even when manufacturers show concepts of such vehicles they always have the footnote that it will only be produced as a 5 door. They reckon there is so much choice in the market now, but in some ways there isn't.

Don't worry they'll be

16 weeks 5 days ago

Don't worry they'll be creating a new Sub class - small SUV Market soon. When they upsize, a new smaller class squeezes in below.

www.KOOOLcr.com

Seems ilke a strange choice

16 weeks 5 days ago

If you wanted something a 'bit more off road' you would buy an XTrail or a Freelander. Otherwise, the CRV and Santa Fe would make a better fist of things on road. Perhaps you'd look at this if you were buying your second or third Rav4 and the Toyota dealer was offering the best trade in proce?

The side-hinged door

16 weeks 5 days ago

One of my colleagues drives a RAV4. In this time of downsizing she can't seem to have enough of her 4WD and won't trade it in for any of the new smarter looking SUVs.

In five years of ownership the only complaint she can think of is the car's side-hinged rear door and a slightly lower than claimed 28mpg from her 2L petrol auto.

Lost in the wilderness....

16 weeks 5 days ago

As I see it the original dinky RAV4 concept was supposedly kept alive through the smaller Urban Cruiser, but that was such a terrible flop that nobody noticed. This new model has some dubious styling and no real character to speak of, unlike, say a Skoda Yeti which can be had in top spec 4x4 trim for less than one of these.

Size

16 weeks 5 days ago

It's of note that there are a number of references to a Range Rover in the article; ever since I saw a mk3 RAV4 parked alongside an original Range Rover I no longer consider that it is that "compact"

Range Rover (from wikipedia):

  • Length: 4470mm
  • Width: 1778mm
  • Height: 1778mm

RAV4 mk 3 (Latest Version in brackets) (UK market Mk3 dimensions Wikipedia, mk4 from Toyota UK website)

  • Length: 4395mm (4570mm)
  • Width: 1815mm (1845mm)
  • Height: 1685mm (1460mm)

The only dimension it's now smaller in is it's height, otherwise a compact SUV is the same size as what was marketed as an SUV 30 years ago... and that's progress?! Compared to the technology market where smaller and lighter is better, the automotive industry is rapidly heading towards being a lumbering dinosaur where everything has to be bigger than before.

To me the market for a compact 4x4 is still there; the popularity of the Suzuki Jimny and the Grand Vitara in rural areas highlights how popular the model is, and that there is a sustained demand for them. No one else really competes; both have a proper transfer case with H2, H4 and L4, whereas many of their competitors (including Land Rover Freelanders) rely on fancy computers to do the same.

In Australia I worked on a propery where there were a number of RAV4's run by employees; they are good little cars for the dirt road that we had to use to access the property, but even they needed replacement parts that a full size (Land Cruiser/Patrol) 4x4 didn't need. Mainly the suspension and steering bushes wore out and then the tyres needed replacement as the alignment had gone out of whack due to the dirt road.

Bland...

16 weeks 5 days ago

...Bland bland bland bland. Back to what Toyotas used to be with the Corolla. It's like the GT86 never happened -- but then I guess it didn't since it's actually a Subaru.

The side-hinged door

16 weeks 5 days ago

Totally agree about sidehinged door...very heavy with the spare wheel and a real pain when it rains! I had one of the last of the second generation [2005] TRx D-4-D which was a great car that I had for 4 years. The side door was the main reason for not having another. With the current RAV4s, they could have fitted a top-hinged tailgate to those that don't have a spare wheel. I have had my Mazda CX 7 [LPG converted!] for nearly 4 years so maybe I'll go for the RAV next. I have been invited to see the demonstrator that is already in my local Toyota garage, so I guess that a test drive is on the cards!

kcrally wrote: Don't worry

16 weeks 5 days ago

kcrally wrote:

Don't worry they'll be creating a new Sub class - small SUV Market soon. When they upsize, a new smaller class squeezes in below.

But, as with the VW Taigun, they all seem to want to squeeze in 5 doors...

Why has it lost 30 horses ? !

16 weeks 5 days ago

Why has it lost 30 horses ? !

Please register or login to post a comment.

Our Verdict

The Toyota RAV4 offers tidy handling and fine engines, but also a choppy ride and high price

  • First Drive

    Toyota RAV4 2.2 D4-D 150 SR

    Facelifted car mates turbodiesel to auto 'box - but it's not all good news
  • First Drive

    Toyota RAV4 2.2 D-4D T180

    The RAV4 is a strong competitor at the £20,000 mark, but up the price to £27,000 and its case becomes much weaker.

Driven this week