• If the new CR-V looks more crossover than old-guard SUV it may be because the roofline is 30mm lower than before
  • The pinched nose treatment is intended to present a bolder face to the world
  • These 18-inch wheels are the biggest you'll see on any CR-V
  • The CR-V has a much less steep A-pillar, thanks to the windscreen being 60mm further upwards
  • The tapered side glass is edged in chrome and draws your eye away from the CR-V's squarer roofline
  • For a manufacturer perceived as an almost-premium brand, Honda has shown a disappointing lack of flair with the CR-V's cabin
  • There is ample accommodation on offer in the rear with no obstructive transmission tunnel
  • Despite the lower roofline, the boot has grown in size and is improved with a lower lip line
  • At entry level S-trim, you'll have only an AM/FM radio, USB connection and a CD player to keep you occupied
  • The Honda finds good traction, grip and braking stability in the wet
  • Body control is not great and not bad, simply average
  • The CR-V's drivetrain is more efficient, more sophisticated and lighter than its forebear
  • The CR-V feels like a front-wheel-drive car for the vast majority of the time
  • Turn the ESP off and the the CR-V can become surprisingly mobile at the rear
  • No longer one of the class elite. A competent but unremarkable SUV

The current CR-V may not look that much different to the car it succeeds, but that’s because Honda is following Volkswagen’s cue and not messing with a winning formula any more than it has to. Besides, the fourth generation car is far more changed than first acquaintances might suggest.

It is, for example both lower by 30mm and shorter by 5mm than the last car. However, it suffers no reduction of interior space, says Honda, thanks to smarter packaging. It’s torsionally stiffer, too. A longer roof and flatter floor have smoothed out the airflow both over and under the car and combine with more efficient engines to provide some useful gains in fuel economy and falls in CO2 emissions.

Matt Saunders

Deputy road test editor
You can opt for a powered tailgate, operated via the key

Another throwback to the CR-V’s history is that two-wheel drive is the exception rather than the norm. Many newer rivals retain an all-wheel drive model just because of the credibility that would be lost if an off-roader was produced with literally no off-road ability. By contrast, four-wheel drive remains very much a CR-V staple and is available on all models save those fitted with the entry-level 1.6-litre diesel.

However, just two engines were available at first, a 2.0-litre four-cylinder petrol and a 2.2-litre diesel that has taken the lion’s share of sales in the UK. Doubtless Honda could have installed a higher-output engine – in the US the mainstay is a 185bhp 2.4-litre petrol – but in Europe, demand for such a thirsty, tax-inefficient powerplant would be negligible.

The new 1.6-litre diesel had been added as a low-emissions, low-consumption model, so unsurprisingly comes without even the option of either all-wheel drive or the five-speed automatic transmission available in CR-Vs with the either the larger petrol or diesel engine.

The CR-V sits on a bespoke platform that uses McPherson struts at the front and a multi-link rear end.

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • First Drive
    22 December 2014
    Entry-level diesel MPV shares its three-cylinder engine with Mini but, due to long gearing, lacks the authoritative punch of a convincing premium product
  • Car review
    17 December 2014
    The replacement for the CL grand tourer has some big boots to fill
  • Mercedes-Benz CLS 350 AMG Line Shooting Brake review
    First Drive
    16 December 2014
    Elegant, alluring and with some welcome improvements, but not good enough to lead the class
  • First Drive
    15 December 2014
    Hushed, flexible and remarkable value for money. Arguably more fit-for-purpose than any other ‘S’.
  • 2015 Mazda CX-3 review
    First Drive
    12 December 2014
    The Mazda CX-3 has style and substance, and deserves consideration for anyone wanting a compact urban SUV. Here’s hoping Mazda gets the price and equipment right