Richard Bremner
31 July 2012

What is it?

This is the coupé version of the popular Mini Countryman, and there’s a bit more to it than the simple deletion of a pair of doors. The need to retool most of the side panels of the Countryman to produce two fewer openings has provided the opportunity to create a car of slightly different character to the more practical Countryman, as no more than a glance at the finished thing — the car you see in these images is obviously disguised — reveals.

This is a much sportier-looking bigger Mini. Its tailgate is more raked, its rear quarter panels have swollen to lend its rear half some muscle, its new rear wraparound lamps are decidedly more shapely and its roof dips decisively rearwards. Imagine a shrunken three-door Evoque and you’ve captured much of the visual character of this car, although the bluff nose of the Countryman is retained at the front end. The result is pretty appealing, just as it is inside, where you’ll find stylishly individual bucket rear seats providing usefully more room than the smaller Mini hatch manages.

The Paceman sits on the same structure as the Countryman, of course, and shares the five-door’s wheelbase and track. Its roof, however, stands 4cm  lower while losing occupants only 1cm of headroom, in part because it rides 1cm closer to terra firma. That’s consistent with this XL-scale three-door Mini’s mission, which is to deliver a sportier drive than the Countryman while providing more space than the standard hatch. Incidentally, it’s also 20kg lighter than the Countryman. 

The dynamic recipe is predictable. Apart from the reduced centre of gravity stemming from its lower stance, the springs and shock absorbers have been retuned to suit its racier mission. Otherwise, this car will be familiar to a Countryman driver, save for the relocation of the electric window and central locking switches to the doors, where they’re more accessible (the same change is also destined for the five-door). BMW says it will be charging a premium of around £1200 over the Countryman for this more dashing bigger Mini, which seems a bit steep given the reduced door count, even if you do get more style.

What is it like?

We got to try a prototype 182bhp Paceman Cooper S, as the pictures of this camouflaged car reveal. You’ll also be able to choose from Cooper, Cooper D and Cooper SD varieties, but there won’t be a One or First. Four-wheel drive is optional, and a new six-speed auto option replaces the CVT transmission. In terms of the driving, this development car is pretty close to the finished thing, not least because it isn’t all that different from a Countryman. However, it is different, and in ways that for the most part will please the keen driver, as we discovered in back-to-back comparisons with a Cooper S Countryman. 

It feels better tied down, as you’d expect of a car that runs closer to the road, and it’s more firmly sprung and feels more agile with it. The revisions also lessen the appearance of one of the Countryman’s less endearing dynamic quirks, which is steering effort that can suddenly diminish mid-corner when a bump is struck, occasionally prompting you to suddenly steer deeper into a bend than intended. The flaw is still there, but surfaces less often. The Countryman’s faintly wayward progress along roads of varying camber — and there are plenty of those in Britain — is undiminished in the Paceman. The ca's need for an occasional direction-correcting nudge is a flaw that has you feeling slightly less confident. 

The Paceman also presents a firmer ride than the Countryman, and given how unyielding the five-door can feel in Cooper S form with larger wheels, we’d resist ordering this three-door with big rims. There’s more chop in its advance along heaving roads, and that could well turn to crash and clatter on scarred Tarmac. 

Steering? As mentioned, its resistance is less prone to sudden fade-outs but this isn’t the most feelsome guidance device. You’ll also sense the tightening writhe of torque steer under hard acceleration, although there’s less of this than in the Countryman. That rim-squirm can be a while coming if you floor the throttle at 1500rpm or less, the turbo’s initial indolence forcing you to drop down a gear more often than you’d like.

On a more practical front, it’s reasonably easy to get to the Paceman’s rear seats, a little less so to escape, which the taller may want to do after a while because headroom is a little tight. So is the boot compared with a Golf’s, as it is in a Countryman, although there’s a biggish well beneath the false floor. And other Countryman failings persist, such as excess wind noise, the odd dash rattle and the general sense that this car is not as refined as it should be.

Should I buy one?

There will be plenty who find this more decisively more stylish bigger Mini hard to resist, especially as its enlarged packaging is undoubtedly more practical than the smaller hatch’s.

There's no question about it, the Paceman presents a style all its own unless it’s the front end that you’re staring at. But if it’s the driving that’s your priority, then it’s the regular Cooper S that you need. The smaller package simply gels at a more accomplished dynamic level. The potential £1200 mark-up apart, which seems too hefty, there seems little doubt that this stylish new Mini variant will sell.

However, as with both the Countryman and the classic original, it proves that bigger isn’t necessarily better.

Mini Paceman Cooper S

Price £21,960 set; 0-62mph 7.5sec; Top speed 135mph; Economy 47.1mpg; CO2 140g/km; Kerbweight 1290kg; Engine layout in-line, four, 1598cc, turbocharged petrol; Installation transverse, front; Power 182bhp at 5500rpm; Torque 177lb ft at 1600-5000rpm; Power-to-weight 141bhp per tonne; Gearbox 6-spd manual; On sale March 2013

Join the debate

Comments
38

I don't get it!

46 weeks 20 hours ago

A car that weights 1.3 ton can be called a MINI??

And Autocar makes no critisism about this?

-

46 weeks 19 hours ago

What's this thing actually for?

Selective...

46 weeks 19 hours ago

rocketscience wrote:

 A car that weights 1.3 ton can be called a MINI??

And Autocar makes no critisism about this? 

No, it's one of those figures they seem to have wilfully avoided.  A bit like the fact that the author mentioned practically every dimenion on the car except for overall length - unbelievably, Mini have managed to make a 2-door Countryman even longer than the 4-door.  But maybe that was a condition of the trip to Spain to drive it.  And I suppose free long-term test cars are lovely, and I guess you don't want to look a gift cash cow with golden eggs in the mouth.  Or something.

rocketscience wrote: A car

46 weeks 19 hours ago

rocketscience wrote:

A car that weights 1.3 ton can be called a MINI??

And Autocar makes no critisism about this?

Yawn, how boring. No matter what MINI do, you lot will all hate it. No, this is not like the original MINI in concept. So what? You want that, buy a Up! (or varients thereof), Aygo (or varients thereof), Panda, i10, Picanto etc etc. For the rest of us, lets enjoy a fun brand, which puts out some fun cars.

Also, this is a bigger MINI and competes with bigger cars than the standard hatch. Think of it as a Scirocco rival, which, incidentally weights 1271kg in 1.4 form and 1381kg for the 2.0 petrol. I think it weighs about right considering the height, the amount of space, the safety protection etc etc. 

Looks are subjective, I personally like them, much better than the countryman. I will wait until it is fully revealed before I judge completely.

rocketscience wrote: A car

46 weeks 18 hours ago

rocketscience wrote:

A car that weights 1.3 ton can be called a MINI??

And Autocar makes no critisism about this?

But that's why its called MINI and not Mini: It is just a brand that has very little to do with the original apart from some style elements, and in the smaller models the go-kart, fun driving experience. There seems little point to me in constantly harking back to the original, a vehicle which a significant proportion of MINIs current customers have no experience of.

Although I love the hatch and Clubman versions I wouldn't buy one of these larger models. Personally I don't think the style translates so well onto the bigger bodywork, and from what I've read the driving experience is not what I'd want. But judging by the number of 'Countrymen' I see on the road a lot of people do like it, and I think the Paceman will sell well too. BMW, like Citroen and Fiat, are making the most of the brand and as a commercial organisation you wouldn't expect anything else. And its nice that there is the choice of these models for those who want them.

Superstevie Wrote: Yawn

46 weeks 18 hours ago

superstevie wrote:

rocketscience wrote:

A car that weights 1.3 ton can be called a MINI??

And Autocar makes no critisism about this?

Yawn, how boring. No matter what MINI do, you lot will all hate it. No, this is not like the original MINI in concept. So what? You want that, buy a Up! (or varients thereof), Aygo (or varients thereof), Panda, i10, Picanto etc etc. For the rest of us, lets enjoy a fun brand, which puts out some fun cars.

Also, this is a bigger MINI and competes with bigger cars than the standard hatch. Think of it as a Scirocco rival, which, incidentally weights 1271kg in 1.4 form and 1381kg for the 2.0 petrol. I think it weighs about right considering the height, the amount of space, the safety protection etc etc. 

Looks are subjective, I personally like them, much better than the countryman. I will wait until it is fully revealed before I judge completely.

I like it alot. It's got cuteness in the bucket load, and chunkyness too. How could any potential MINI buyer possibly resist? That aside, its actually impressive brand architecture by BMW, given how the brand and the size of the vehicles, like all manufacturers has swollen. Now, the migration from a say Countryman to X1,X3, or Paceman to 3 Series Coupe isn't such a big deal on both price and size. Like MINI or hate it, BMW knew the value of the brand ten years ago, and had Rover being in business today, although they may have enjoyed a similar inital success, Money, Brand Acumen and the potential to springboard into other own label cars would have not been possible.

 

They buy the brand, not the stats

46 weeks 17 hours ago

I would suspect that people buying a MINI these days are primarily getting one because of the brand as it is now, cheeky/trendy/customisable/whatever.  History could have a vague connection.  Some may of course be tempted by the go-cart feel of the better models.  Dimensions, space, weight, etc may be far from their initial priority.  If they like what they see, they buy it.  Just like anything else, really.  Some people will buy a car just because they like the colour of the one in the showroom! 

Whilst MINI is not on my current radar as a choice, I welcome diversity in a brand and wish this one good luck.  Every time I see the rear of the Countryman, though, I can see a good reason why I would not want that particular model, so if Paceman improves on that, this is good news.  All very personal, though.

How long before a cabrio

46 weeks 16 hours ago

How long before a cabrio comes along, then maybe a hardtop version of the cabrio, then a roadster version of the hardtop (you get the idea).

One niche too many IMHO.

Detailing still bad

46 weeks 6 hours ago

Cannot comment on the handling , ride, etcetera; indeed only the writer of the review is in a position to do so. However the detailing, as in all the latest attempts to produce a new Mini, is not good. The clunky Countryman style front, the arrangement of the indicator repeaters and the design of the alloy wheels are all not what they should be.

1,300kgs isn't hugely chubby

46 weeks 15 hours ago

1,300kgs isn't hugely chubby compared to a lot of similar sized modern hatchbacks. To be honest, I would have expected it to be pushing 1.5 tons, so I'm almost a little bit surprised.

Not really convinced as to what the concept really is with the Paceman, or who it's meant to appeal to. But it'll still probably sell better than Olympic Beach Volleyball tickets.

Please register or login to post a comment.

Driven this week