Turbocharging technology will not be used on Ferrari's V12-engined models in the near future, despite the company now using turbo V8 units elsewhere
27 March 2015

Ferrari V12 engines will not be turbocharged in the near future - but they are likely to get electrical assistance in order to smooth power delivery and lower emissions.

There had been speculation that Ferrari could turbocharge its V12s in future, as it has begun doing with its V8 line-up, spearheaded by the new 488 GTB.

However, a source close to the company said: “There will be no turbos on our V12s. Expect instead to see 48-volt systems on the next generation.”

This means future V12 Ferraris will be mild hybrids, using technology pioneered on the LaFerrari hypercar.

Such a move will allow Ferrari to maximise fuel economy and CO2 emissions but also tune the engine for pure power, knowing that the commensurate drop-off in low-down torque will be more than replaced by instantaneous electrical energy.

Get the latest car news, reviews and galleries from Autocar direct to your inbox every week. Enter your email address below:

Our Verdict

Ferrari LaFerrari
LaFerrari was one of the most anticipated cars of 2014

The Enzo’s successor is finally here. The LaFerrari costs over £1 million and has a 950bhp hybrid V12, but just how good is it? Steve Sutcliffe straps in to see

Join the debate


27 March 2015

Can Ferrari be onto something with this electrical assistance/hybrid thingy. It's high for a breakthrough in petrol powertrain technology which reach beyond the current gimmicks that the car makers are using to dodge the system instead of making any real efficiency gains.

27 March 2015

There is a great deal I dislike about the spirit of Ferrari these days, but their perseverance with the V12 forgives a lot.

28 March 2015

How do you figure a V12, is good for the environment. (v6 3.5 ltr perhaps)



28 March 2015

They're not saying V12s are good for the environment, but an improved, though, true MPG figure that relates to what most owners will get is better than the battery-only figures that most people will never achieve.

Majority of owners will use both petrol and battery rather than just one part of a hybrid system, such as electric only.

The super-low CO2 figures released for cars like 918 are just headline grabbers. Who buys such a car for economy? Nobody. However, 10 MPG improvement combined, is better than 20 on, say, battery power alone. I think that is what they mean.

28 March 2015

If that illness could avoid the V12...

29 March 2015

Kcrally, how is a 3.5 turbo good for the environment? Isn't a bike better? Some people have loads of money and unless you take their money away from them they will buy giant houses that are not good for the environment, fly around in small jets that are not good for the environment, eat beef which is not good for the environment etc etc.

29 March 2015

Fernando Alonso - that must have been humiliating for him !!!

what's life without imagination

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Car review
    21 October 2016
    Can Seat’s first SUV impress, even with the heavy burden of expectation?
  • Car review
    21 October 2016
    The last hurrah for the current Aston Martin Vantage adds the track-ready GT8 to the range
  • Audi S5 Sportback
    First Drive
    20 October 2016
    New S5 Sportback is more spacious, better to drive and offers a calmer ride than before, but rivals offer greater involvement
  • Renault Clio RS 220 Trophy
    First Drive
    19 October 2016
    Mildly revised hot hatch is enjoyable on UK roads but continues to play second fiddle to the Ford Fiesta ST
  • 2016 Smart fortwo Brabus cabrio xclusive
    First Drive
    18 October 2016
    Mechanical upgrades make the Smart Fortwo Brabus cabrio better to drive, but it’s too pricey to recommend