Wed
May 06 2009

Lotus Evora v Porsche Cayman S

Steve Sutcliffe
So we’re not entirely sure about the looks, and some of the interior is a teeny bit suspect, not so much from an aesthetic point of view but – disappointingly but inevitably perhaps – on quality.

But in most other respects the Evora is a proper piece of work, combining quite extraordinarily good mechanical refinement with a stonking good chassis, beautiful steering, strong yet subtle performance and a level of equipment that just about justifies its price. You can read our first drive by clicking here.



It’s also the world’s first and only mid-engined 2+2, which is admirable, although in all honesty it’s more of a 2+0.5, so little room is there in the rear chairs for anyone much over the age of two. Either way, it’s an impressively packaged sports car that is genuinely more practical than most. You can, according to Lotus, cram two full size sets of golf clubs in the boot, even if there wouldn’t be much room for all the other detritus required by would-be Padraig Harringtons.

But what’s it like beside the mighty Porsche Cayman S?

That’s the big one for the Evora, and it’s a very big one indeed when you think about it. Pound for pound the Cayman is probably Porsche’s best all round car, and in S guise it is knee-tremblingly good to drive. Yet this is the exact car that Lotus targeted when designing, refining and signing off the Evora, so…

Without wishing to give the game away completely, let’s just say that there are lots of things the Evora does better than the Porsche, and not very many that it does worse. The Cayman is itself no great looker in the eyes of many, but in the opinion of this particular author it looks a million dollars beside the Lotus. It also feels – and sounds – quite a bit perkier than the Evora in the intermediate ratios, a result of its significantly shorter gearing and louder engine/exhaust note combo.

And as for the difference in cabin quality, let’s just leave it at Weissach 1, Hethel 0 and move on. Except you can’t, because the Evora is such a disappointment inside quality-wise – and especially beside the unusually well made Cayman – it becomes an impossible factor to ignore.

However, get past the Evora’s one or two static foibles and compare it with the Cayman on the road, and a totally different picture begins to emerge. The Lotus may not sound as throaty as you’d expect but it’s faster than the Cayman in a straight line, and in the mid-range the response from its 3.5-litre V6 can leave the Porsche feeling flat footed by comparison.

It also steers more sweetly than the Cayman, which is some achievement, while its all-round double wishbone suspension provides a level of composure that is just breathtaking, even in the soaking wet conditions in which most of this test took place. What you notice most jumping from one to another is the extra agility and composure of the Evora when you’re really going for it. It changes direction with such precision and immediacy, all the Cayman driver can do is watch in awe. It’s that well sorted, is the Evora, yet at the same time it’s that much more comfortable than the Cayman as well.

I’ll leave the final verdict for the magazine comparison in a couple of weeks’ time, but in the meantime consider this. As it stands this particular version of the Evora is just the beginning; a platform from which numerous variants will emerge, some of which will have more power (quite a lot more power when they fit the supercharger) and be significantly more focused in set up. And yet even as it is now the Evora is good enough to give the ultimate version of Cayman a very hard time indeed. You’ll have to read the mag in two weeks time to find out how hard.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Steve Sutcliffe

Autocar's finest driver and most experienced road tester. Raced TVRs for three years; drove Honda's F1 car and set competitive times at Silverstone. Says he "likes cars, and likes other people who like cars".

Comments

johnfaganwilliams May 6, 2009 10:05 AM

World's first mid engined 2+2? Not according to Ferrari!

scrap May 6, 2009 10:22 AM

Re: the quality issues... normally magazines like Autocar are happy to gloss over these for a new Brit sports car, or excuse them by saying the car they drove was a "pre-production" model?

Is the cabin quality really that bad? Or is it more the gap between Lotus' claims and the reality?

theop May 6, 2009 11:19 AM

Quality will be quality. Having owned a Mk2 Elise, I would suspect the usual "hand made" illfitting bits and bobs and signs of human touch rather than the quality of materials itself. They will be better than TVR, just.

I want to believe the Evora will be a success - I want it to. I think it will offer everything the Elise did in dynamic terms and will be much better than the Elise at everything else. Capacity, town driving (90% of most buyers domain) and driving at 4-6/10ths. On those latter points I want to believe it will be better than any Porsche (currently the best riding porsche is a stock suspension 18inch shod Carrera 2) and def vs the Cayman S, that for me has a horribly crashy, noisy and uncomfortable ride when at 3/10ths pottering abt in town. The |Evora will also be a much rarer sight, and hopefully not a City Broker's mobile like Porkers and M3s are.

If I had 50-60k burning a hole in my pocket, the Evora looks like it would make the shortlist for a sports car (and due to having been a Lotus owner before and a certain age over 30 now) losing only to a candidate such as a mildly used the new 5litre XKR.

Apples and oranges....

Overdrive May 6, 2009 11:20 AM

Here we go again, a British car maker builds a half decent car and British motoring journalists delve in hyperbole.

"...all the Cayman driver can do is watch in awe....", if you say so, Mr. Sutcliffe.

Steve Sutcliffe May 6, 2009 11:22 AM

IIt's not that bad, no, but the point is that for £50k it should be better. And when you compare it directly with the Cayman quality wise, the difference is painfully obvious.

chandrew May 6, 2009 11:47 AM

I went to the Geneva show specifically to look at the Evora and concur that the rear seats aren't much use, even to carry my 3 year-old.  This, unfortunately, doesn't seem to be unique to the Lotus - at the time we were comparing it to a 997 and all suffer from needing to have the passenger with knees against the dashboard.  Realistically it seems only Maserati and Ferrari understand the requirement, but we're not talking about the same buying and running costs.

So, then, for us it came down to focussing on a 2-seater for early morning solo drives onto the alpine passes or Black Forest - a toy with no requirement for practicality.  My decision after speaking to the folk on the stand was that other cars in their range better suited to that task.

I will wait for the more focused versions with interest.  

macaroni May 6, 2009 1:03 PM

"World's first mid engined 2+2? Not according to Ferrari!"

Or Matra, with their 530 from the 60s.

Good grief, some people have short memories!

drivenfromtherearplease May 6, 2009 1:26 PM

I can see where you are comming from re the quality Steve.

If I had just the £50k I would probably walk away, regardless of how well it drove and would buy a second hand exige etc with a 3 series coupe for everyday use. Probably still wouldn't buy the Caymen.

Now If I had a spare £50k and there was a space in my large garage then it would certainly be on my list, and still no to the Caymen. I would have the money and the available transport not to worry regarding the quality and just concentrate on the driving.

However congratulations once more to Lotus for producing what seams to be another corker. They have done right by concentrating on the quality of engineering dynamics rather than build and it would be a worrying time if that had been reversed. Just hope there is some money left in the kitty for further quality development and perhaps further sales will ensue.

RednBlue May 6, 2009 3:03 PM

Is it me, or is this car definitely ugly?

It could even leave a Cayman for dead, according to Brit press, in a straight line or in a twisty B-road, but I suspect that other continental mags will tell us a different story.

I started to consider this mag under a different light after I drove for the first time a Focus. I tought it was a sort of miracle of modern car technology, convinced by thousands of Autocar testers, and it was a crappy car instead. An Alfa 147, dynamically, was definitely way better than that.  

RednBlue May 6, 2009 3:13 PM

Btw, have you ever seen a Ferrari 308 Gt4, a Ferrari Mondial, a Lamborghini Urraco or a MAserati Merak? All mid-engined 2+2s...

Audi Tastic May 6, 2009 3:57 PM

Many a small car manufacturer has pitted iself against Porsche and nearly all have lost.

Lotus has a lot more heritage than most which should help, but I fear the result will eventually be the same, particularly in a recession where reliability and residuals come to the fore.

whatever happened to the Artega?

Ravon May 6, 2009 8:25 PM

Well, well, Porsche shown how to do it again, just think how much greater the Evora might have been if it was fitted with a bespoke flat six with direct injection and a transaxle giving it an ultra low center of gravity than an obsolete Toyota saloon engine simply moved from a front drive location to a "rear" not mid location .If my memory serves me correctly the Ferarri Mondial, a proper mid engined 2 + 2, was revolutionised when it became a Mondial T, which featured a proper mid engined layout with the engined mounted longitudinally and a transaxle ( albeit a transverse one ! ) Even British design guru Lee Nobel abandoned the cheap and cheerful front drive power train in the rear on his much delayed new car in favour of a longitudinal layout with a Gratziano (?) transaxle.

It truely amazes me that poor old Sutters and even chief editor Cropley would allow such factually incorrect journalism to stand with regard to the claim of the first and only mid engined 2 + 2, but then they were the ones that promoted the obviously ludicrous weight predictions of the 340R, how much I'm looking forward to see that "usefully faster" track performance of the Evora over the Cayman. Sadly objectivity goes out the window with Lotus, it makes  respected journos look corruptable, and does Lotus no favours !

I'm lucky enough to own and drive both marques, and love them both, but hat BS !!! My Regards.

horseandcart May 6, 2009 8:32 PM

'whatever happened to the Artega?'

they have had delays in ramping up initial production and at the moment LHD is only available but RHD is being worked on. See here:

www.artega.de/index.php

jl4069 May 7, 2009 2:16 AM

"Well, well, Porsche shown how to do it again, just think how much greater the Evora might have been if it was fitted with a bespoke flat six with direct injection and a transaxle giving it an ultra low center of gravity than an obsolete Toyota saloon engine simply moved from a front drive location to a "rear" not mid location .If my memory serves me correctly the Ferarri Mondial, a proper mid engined 2 + 2,"

Ravon,

Although your right with regard to what it would take to create a faster car. Steve seems to have a point in his drive story. It would seem that some believe that in  some ways a rear engine is a bit more predicable than a mid-engine car in difficult conditions. This has been covered in evo magazine by John Barker several times in his comparisons of Boxster/Cayman S to various 911's. Each time he has found the rear-engine set up to be more predictable and progressive when being really pushed at 9/10's. Proably because its begins to drift sooner. Now I'm not trying to say that Lotus were so clever to design the car this way on purpose, but maybe they got lucky. Lets not forget just how well all manner of 911's do in all aspects of driving-race and road. I've always wished the Autocar team would indeed be more like Barker in being able to connect such dot, like how cars compare with one another on different roads and against one another and as well WHY they might be so!! Note autocar are now telling us that the Skyline is no longer a B-road ace, and that it has questionable handling in the wet?? Where's the connections boys??? As Michael Jackson said, "why, why"?

Ravon May 7, 2009 8:14 AM

Dearjl4069, a very interesting view point, one that's somewhat ironic to me ! I'm getting old, and hear my father in my words ! He would get very angry at the written words of Bill Body in Motor Sport, just as I get disappointed by what I read from the few journalists that I still respect. The journalist you mention was held in very high regard by me until he turned up at Classic Le Mans this year in a completely bogus Capri, fitted with a GAA engine that absolutely never ran at Le Mans, and certainly not in a fibre glass car, so no big deal, but then he wrote a wonderful article in his rag effectively legitimising the car, pleased to say with red faces, the FIA see it differently ! So journalistic truth is out the window when it comes to a free drive and a cheap article ! I hold Sutters and Cropely as paragons, along with Meaden and Harris, so don't like them making fundemental mistakes. So for me, I can no longer trust the guy in terms of what he might say about mid versus rear layouts. In truth, despite the value aspect, of the old Porsches, and old Lotuses at my disposal, with my level of skill, the 968CS is head and shoulders the most enjoyable chassis !

A friend has had a new GTR since January, talking to him at the weekend, he now drives and loves his Cayman S over the Nissan every time ! My regards.

phenergn May 7, 2009 9:37 AM

It's not just interior quality, but longevity, and small-volume cars don't tend to stand the test of time in the long run. I drive a Porsche that is just about to have it's 10th birthday; but from the drivers seat, following a good thorough clean, it could have rolled off the production line yesterday. I'd love to say that the same will be true of an Evora in 2019, but I can't believe it's true. (Although I'd bet that the running gear, especially the Toyota V6, will still be going strong).

RednBlue May 7, 2009 10:13 AM

I just can't stop thinking that one has got a unique Porsche engine, the other one has got a Toyota one. Which one is the most exclusive?

theop May 7, 2009 1:41 PM

"I drive a Porsche that is just about to have it's 10th birthday; but from the drivers seat, following a good thorough clean, it could have rolled off the production line yesterday"

so that would be 1999 Phenergn thus it would be an early 996 you d be talking abt...

Impressive as any 996's I ve seen (was in the mrkt to buy a used one last year, but ended up with a 15yo SL500 instead) were absolute horrors...

Never has Porsche made a worse car in interior quality terms.... There are 1988 Toyota Corolla Minicabs in Athens that look better inside, no offence...

phenergn May 7, 2009 3:44 PM

Actually it's a MK1 Boxster S with the optional full leather interior pack. The interior isn't anywhere near as nice as the MK2 boxster, but it is very well screwed together and the materials are holding up increadibly well. The only obvious wear is on the right hand side drivers seat bolster, where it is worn getting in and out.

phenergn May 7, 2009 3:49 PM

In the interests of fairness I could mention that I did test one that looked a lot less tidy inside. Perhaps mine was just well cared for, but it wasn't the only one I saw of a similar vintage with a spotless interior.

jl4069 May 7, 2009 6:36 PM

Ravon,

You wrote:

"but then he wrote a wonderful article in his rag effectively legitimising the car, pleased to say with red faces, the FIA see it differently !"

Sorry I'm not following, I read evo at the news-stand as its no longer worth the money, how did Barker "legitimize the car" as you say?

BTW I personally think Barker is a man-child who has tremendous insecurities, but I still think hes the best tester of road cars on the planet - hes got the deepest vocabulary for what its like to drive a car on the limit, and he puts most (not nearly enough but something!) of his drives in context. Hes so specific in his anyisyis that for example he compares two golfs- a gti and an R32, and went to lengths to differentiate their handling saying the Haldex 4Wd on the R32 was slow to react steering it off course right where the GTi was still on track- which some friends have confirmed as well. Indeed the Haldex system is slow to react in some conditions, and Barker was the only journalist to put to words. And thats just one example. Granted the man barely writes a thing anymore and does rant on about this Capri all day!! thanks, JL

theos May 7, 2009 7:55 PM

I think a lot of the comments on this post have touched on what has become blatantly apparent to anyone who keenly reads the motoring press. Most of the British car mags’ jingoist slant has become a bit wearisome. Almost every article concerning “British” cars – and for some reason all Fords- raves about their brilliance. Honestly, a re-re-heated MG roadster? Please!

And whereas I have no doubt that the Range Rover is a fantastic piece of kit, and that Jaguar can rival Merc and BMW, all these comments need to come with a massive disclaimer attached. “Great car – when it works”. After a hundred years of automotive production anyone who cannot make a reliable car, one that you can count on each and every day (and night) if need be, deserves to go out of business. Or be sold as scrap to some wealthy investor… as most of the British car industry has.  

Concerning Lotus I must state that my few drives behind the wheel of an Elise and one behind the wheel of a 450hp Esprit were most enjoyable. Amazing fun; and I must declare Lotus to be the premier kit-car maker in the world! Because that is what we are talking about. Anyone who does not manufacture their own engines (the heart and soul) of any car, is not a manufacturer per se. And when seen in that light, one could excuse the shoddy build quality, and the “character” of becoming intimate with the local garage and mechanic if the price is right. Lotus has a glorious history, but the present is an on-going battle to survive and its future uncertain. Porsche has a glorious history, an extremely strong present, and -judging from today’s news –a viable future. One is a car, the other a toy. Apples and oranges.

The British car industry failed for the same reason the American did. There was something fundamentally wrong with the product. And after decades of under-performing, no amount of national pride of brand allegiance was enough to excuse the crap associated with owning the product, especially when compared to superior competition. And while it’s obviously quite the rage to bash BMWs and Porsches (apparently not everyone likes a winner) their success is based not only on slick marketing or status, but on a core product that is solid.

And when I spend my hard-earned cash to buy a car I want to have a good time, I want to enjoy it, head off in the middle of the night on empty mountain roads and “rev the nuts off it”. And I will gladly trade a touch of feel, a bit of response, a plainer interior and a more muted exhaust for the security of knowing that I will get home after the fun is over, that it will start no matter the weather, and bits won’t come off in my hand.  I had a 2002! XK8 that rusted , a Tuscan that split its brake hoses while been driven hard and then on another occasion seizing its engine at 120kph and putting me in a freshly ploughed field, and a 6000 km Range that left us on a beach 2 hours walk from a phone signal. No such issues with any of the Porsches.

Thanks for the soapbox.  

Ravon May 7, 2009 9:32 PM

jl4069,

The journo in question has helped to legitimize the completely bogus GAA engined Mk1 capri by writing his article on racing the car at Classic Le Mans, showing its 24 valve engine and referring to it in the text as though it was completely genuine. I spoke to him at the event, I spoke to a number of experts at the event, who all confirmed my views, I've also read the homoligation papers, no GAA engined plastic bodied Capri was ever homoligated, plastic bodied Mk1's only ever had Weslake pushrod engines. The journo in question claims to be a Capri fanatic but doesn't know the basic motorsport history. I understand these fakes will not be seen again, the FIA don't know how they got papers ! Problen is for the average EVO reader, racing Mk1 Capri's have 24 valve engines period ! Its ironic that EVO's sister publication, Octane features Tony Dron consistantly banging on about fakes in racing ! spoke to Octane's editor at Classic Le Mans about the fake Capri's and he wasn't vaguely interested either, all too busy with their noses in the Ford hospitality trough ! Canceled subscriptions to both EVO and Octane as a result, and now enjoy a free scan in Sainsburys !

My Regards

Seem to have wondered far off the Evora track !

jl4069 May 7, 2009 10:02 PM

ITs so funny, all this criticism- day in and day out must be like a nightmare to Autocar. Especially as self righteous a crew as Sutters, Haslett and Prior are. Clearly most sensitive and LESS coddled readers are making them look insensitive and indeed coddled- and in turn this makes them angrier and more defensive. Indeed I have brought up several major inconsistencies in their journalism and yet they refuse to reply! Seems the mimic of corps vs citizens we see before us so in bold print everyday now. I hope things will change (sorry for the bad Obama pun there) and a clear line of communication can be formed between reader and journalists? Quite sick of their attitude its not just evo its the industry itself.  JL

pitfield May 7, 2009 11:48 PM

I can't believe nobody has mentioned the Merak!

pitfield May 7, 2009 11:48 PM

Oh they have, I just can't read, sorry

jprestidge May 8, 2009 8:59 AM

This is a very strange thread - half of the comments read like they were first written in Spanish then translated to English via Google Translate.

I really don't understand people who read an article on a website then whinge about how biased it is; no-one is forcing you to read it, and it's not as if you actually paid any money to do so in the first place. If you don't like it, go and browse through other automotive websites. I think you'll find, though, that they all rate the Evora highly, with a few minor caveats.

JP

Ryan Bane May 8, 2009 9:01 AM

.. and I thought the Cayenne was ugly...

I think its fair to say that Autocar have a history of trumpeting new British cars from the rooftop - fair enough it's a British mag, and those headlines will sell a few extra copies for the week.

In the end, it may be as good as Autocar are hinting (although history would suggest otherwise) - it bloody better be for 50k!!!, and Lotus may sell everyone it makes (i hope it suceeds).  But at Lotus production rates, it will still be a very niche model - I doubt Porsche will be losing too much sleep.

RednBlue May 8, 2009 9:05 AM

"theos:

Concerning Lotus I must state that my few drives behind the wheel of an Elise and one behind the wheel of a 450hp Esprit were most enjoyable. Amazing fun; and I must declare Lotus to be the premier kit-car maker in the world! Because that is what we are talking about. Anyone who does not manufacture their own engines (the heart and soul) of any car, is not a manufacturer per se. And when seen in that light, one could excuse the shoddy build quality, and the “character” of becoming intimate with the local garage and mechanic if the price is right. Lotus has a glorious history, but the present is an on-going battle to survive and its future uncertain. Porsche has a glorious history, an extremely strong present, and -judging from today’s news –a viable future. One is a car, the other a toy. Apples and oranges. "

Couldn't agree more with that.

We are talking about two cars and two brands which are not direct competitors in this market. Not only because of production numbers. One is a niche player, the other one is a global player (even more global after the merger with VAG Group).

At the same time, the two cars, apparently similar, as a matter of fact they are not.

Of course it's just my opinion.

RednBlue May 8, 2009 11:07 AM

"jprestidge:

I really don't understand people who read an article on a website then whinge about how biased it is; no-one is forcing you to read it, and it's not as if you actually paid any money to do so in the first place. If you don't like it, go and browse through other automotive websites."

Can we post only comments in which we praise the article, the magazine and Lotus cars? Can I have a different opinion?

I rate Sutcliffe a lot. Otherwise I wouldn't be here, reading his articles. But sometimes I may have a different view. That's it.

Will86 May 8, 2009 1:06 PM

The front reminds me a bit of a Tata Nano, only not quite so upright.

Despite wanting the British car industry (whats left of it) to survive, I'd take the Cayman over this. Both are exceptional to drive, but while the Lotus may be better on the road, I want my £50k plus car to look and feel £50k plus.

dom180 May 9, 2009 10:53 PM

>> started to consider this mag under a different light after I drove for the first time a Focus. I tought it was a sort of miracle of modern car technology, convinced by thousands of Autocar testers, and it was a crappy car instead. An Alfa 147, dynamically, was definitely way better than that.  

Well I've driven both an the Focus was in a different ballpark to the 147 imho. 147 looked lovely though in its mk1 guise.

Evora sounds great - bit cruel posting this teaser review and having to wait two weeks for the full article :-D

jsr123 May 27, 2009 9:04 PM

After reading Steve's full comparison of the two cars in this week's mag; I was left thrilled for the boys at Hethel - as the Evora seems a magnificent achievement - yet curiously pleased that the Cayman triumphed, albeit by the smallest of margins!

Here's why. Most of us remember that Porsche nearly disappeared altogether, until the top brass pulled an engineering and fiscal blinder with the 986 Boxster and 996 Carrera, in the late nineties. They judged perfectly, the compromise between making a profit and retaining the brand's mechanical integrity. So, what we got in both cars was similar, shiny, hard fascias and rather flimsy switchgear but a new era of sonorous, water-cooled flat six engines which retained the air-cooled block's appetite for high revs and the chassis hunger for the twisty stuff.

From what I have read, much of the 986 and 996 majic live on in the Cayman. I can only imagine how deftly it covers ground at speed, while dishing up detailed messages about the road-surface to the driver and entertaining with the vocal pedigree of it's flat six. I love the styling too and think it's perfectly sized for our congested town roads and narrow country lanes. But...will buyers flock to spend around £45 big ones on a decently optioned new example?! I don't think so. Why? Because 05' 3.4 S versions look like staggeringly good value at around £20k. I even hear that the earlier block emits a keener, meaner bark and so is whisper it...a tad more exciting! A similar story to all MK 2 versions of Porsche's range then, including the 986 and 996. Naturally, they need to dilute aural majic in the pursuit of superior refinement and marginally lower emissions but the transition between successive model iterations always seem marked, no? Talking of which; tidy 18k 996 Carreras and 15k Boxter S models, are alot of car for the cash and plentiful nowadays.

That the Evora - Lotus's first all new year car since 1995 - nearly toppled the mighty Cayman S and only lost points for a characterless engine note and switchgear not befitting it's near 50k price tag, is an incredible achievement. I love the driver focused, sharply angled, hyde covered dash, smart Recaros and modern instrument binnacle. To create a 2 + 1.5 with a pair of child/teen friendly rear perches was also a great idea. Surely, it will steal sales from the Cayman, Nissan 370z & BMW Z4 for this reason alone. I like the styling too; classically British - with that swooping, long nose - but with a really modern twist. Did anyone else spot the Z4-esque down-turned hofmeister kink on the door?

Will the Toyota sourced V6 - with it's slightly anodyne engine note - deter potential buyers? Perhaps. Personally though, I think the one engine and gearbox choice are more problematic. Buyers at this price point surely expect a Direct-Shift Gearbox (DSG) on the options list and some will want a lighter, cheaper variant or more powerful, supercharged model. I know that a faster Evora has been mooted but there has been no mention of an alternative to the stick shift. Nonetheless, I hope this car succeeds in buyers hearts and in the sales charts; it deserves too :)

Nikonguy September 8, 2009 11:12 PM

Not forgetting the Ferrari 400i

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 17-3

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>