Although we’re generally remarkably impressed with the inherent efficiency of modern forced-induction motor, why is it that we welcome the 5.5-litre, twin-turbocharged motor in the CLS63 AMG with a mild sense of trepidation? 

Mainly because we’ve been so won over by the depth of character and performance of the naturally aspirated 6.2-litre V8 it replaces. However, this engine not only has more grunt than the 6.2-litre V8 but is also 32 per cent more efficient.

And in no installation does it make more sense than in the CLS. We already know the four-dour coupé to be excellent luxury transport, and as a sort of high-end enthusiast’s limo it can justify having 549bhp (in the Performance Pack model tested here) better than most other Mercedes. 

But there’s no point to having such extravagant outputs – or an equally extravagent price – if it’s not sensationally entertaining, as well as civilised executive transport. And that’s not an easily achieved compromise.

Top 5 Super saloons

First drives

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • First Drive
    21 May 2015
    The DS 5 is hard to pigeonhole but it works as a package. Impressive French-style long-range cruiser, albeit at strong money for an unproven brand
  • Car review
    21 May 2015
    The industry's biggest power makes a plug-in hybrid for the masses
  • First Drive
    21 May 2015
    The 4C improves, and the Spider is a good conversion, but it remains dynamically troubled and absurdly expensive
  • First Drive
    21 May 2015
    More traction and nothing separating Jag's monstrous V8 mouthpiece from your ears. It's the shoutiest, priciest F-Type on sale, but is it the best?
  • First Drive
    20 May 2015
    The C63 may have lost its big V8, but its replacement makes it difficult to mourn