Matt Saunders
9 August 2012

What is it?

One man’s take on the ultimate performance BMW: this is the Alpina B3 GT3. And the man in question is Andy Bovensiepen, boss of Alpina GmbH – which just happens to be the most famous maker of fast BMWs in the world, with the exception of the obvious.

Having bought a ludicrously exciting BMW M3 GTS, most people would do their best to enjoy it — or they’d just sell it and move on with their lives. That’s what you or I would do. Not Andy. He decided to make the car he had hoped that the M3 GTS would be in the first place. And, as you’ll go on to read, it’s rather a good job that he did.

Bovensiepen’s starting point wasn’t the obvious one. Sure, the GT3 is based on Alpina’s B3 S Bi-turbo, which is itself based on the soon-to-be-replaced ‘E92’ 335i coupe. But this ultimate GT3 version of the B3 has inherited almost as much from Alpina’s German GT Masters B6 racecar as it has from the E92. It’s a limited-edition salute to the firm’s triumphant return to motor racing and, with just 99 to be built, even rarer — not to mention £50k cheaper — than the M3 GTS that inspired it.

The car uses the same mechanically overhauled, twin-turbocharged ‘N54’ straight six that powers the B3 S, derived from the one that used to power the 335i. With a lower compression ratio than the standard BMW engine and a pile of special internals, it produces 402bhp. The improvement over the 395bhp B3 S comes thanks to a bigger-bore Akrapovic titanium exhaust system. The GT3’s 398lb ft of torque is the bit to make M3 owners jealous, though. Even the stroked GTS couldn’t get within 70lb ft of that.

The chassis and running gear is where you can see the competition car’s influence. Alpina has strengthened the E92’s mounting points and fitted track-ready coilover suspension that you can adjust for ride height, as well as through 12 settings of damper compression and 18 settings of rebound at both ends. Not to mention for camber angle at the front wheels. 

Ah, the wheels. They are gorgeous forged aluminum items that weigh less than 10kg each (a normal cast alloy is usually more than 20kg, by the way). The brake discs measure 380mm up front, clamped by six-piston fixed calipers. And there’s also a proper Drexler mechanical limited-slip differential, something we’ve always thought the B3 was lacking.

What is it like?

Despite all that trick kit, Bovensiepen’s aim with the B3 GT3 was actually to make it civilized — much more so than the M3 GTS he took issue with. The GT3 is still an Alpina, after all, and this is a firm that has built its reputation on fast BMWs that are that little bit easier to live with than their official M division equivalents. 

That’s why, in your first few miles in the GT3, you’ll probably find it a strangely unintimidating car; easy on the ear in terms of road noise and exhaust boom, and with an unexpectedly supple ride. This may be Alpina’s first road car to produce aerodynamic downforce, but it’s still one you could drive to the office every morning.

In an ideal world, though, the B3 GT3 owner’s ‘office’ would be about three miles long, thirty feet wide, made of Tarmac, undulating in places and circular. Because you can’t help feeling that this car’s talents are wasted on the road. You just can’t drive it hard and fast enough on the public highway to get anywhere near the full potential of its chassis, marvel that it is, although you can have a whale of a time trying. This is a proper track thoroughbred; it  also just happens to know not to turn out on the kitchen floor.

I’ve never been the biggest fan of the current M3. I like it – most of the time – but I don’t like the complication you have to wrestle with to find the optimum combination of electronic damper, gearbox and differential setting. And I don’t like how hard it makes you work for your fun. The B3 GT3 could have been created as the perfect answer to all that. It’s an unconditional, old-school kind of driver’s car with a warts-and-all sense of honesty about it.

The hydraulic steering is heavy; it's no more direct than the rack on a 335i, but it's wonderful to use because of its feedback and positivity. In ‘road’ mode, the suspension delivers superb wheel control and a smooth, taut, cushioned ride over all but the worst broken surfaces. Incredible balance and agility, too, and an abiding promise that, now matter how much speed you unleash from the turbocharged powerplant, you’ll always find the grip and composure you need to contain it.

Turn-in is a little reluctant. The effect of a mechanical diff is always to promote stability at the straight-ahead, unless it’s a clever electronically controlled one. But once you’ve got the B3 GT3 committed to a corner, it’s a sublime machine to drive through and beyond the apex. Ladle on as much torque as you like – and there’s a generous swell of it once the big turbo has taken a split second to wake up. A trustworthy front end and a neutral attitude is assured, which you can develop into a wonderful meeting of traction and throttle-steer as more and more boost arrives.

Should I buy one?

If you’ve got an M3 and you’re mulling over a replacement, then yes, you should. The official BMW certainly has a more theatrical power delivery and a gearbox more ready to take punishment, not to mention cleaner throttle response, but it’s probably slower than a B3 GT3 on real give-and-take roads. The Alpina’s handling thrills are more accessible and more vivid and absorbing when they come, too. And I’d bet that the Alpina would be the more satisfying and effective track day tool.

Finished off with a fine showing on overall usability, Andy Bovensiepen’s vision for this car has been very well executed, and looks impressively complete. The B3 GT3 is a niche-market machine, a ‘route one’ performance coupé that won’t appeal to the most sophisticated palette — Alpina BMWs never have — but it could still be the best handling 3-series of its generation.

Alpina B3 GT3

Price £66,950; 0-62mph 4.5sec; Top speed 186mph; Economy 29.4mpg; CO2 224g/km; Kerb weight 1535kg (DIN); Engine type, cc 6cyls in line, turbocharged, 2979cc; Installation Front, longitudinal, RWD; Power 402bhp at 6000rpm; Torque 398lb ft at 4500rpm; Gearbox 6-spd automatic

Join the debate

Comments
7

Good thing?

41 weeks 2 days ago

Not getting near the car's potential on the public highway is a good thing,but, having the extra torque in reserve is,you don't need to be driving like a loon to enjoy a powerful car,and anyway, playing with the yr 1's is a bit juvenile,plus, if you must,do some track days,just to see if your man enough, your car, your bills,and it isn't that much over a regular M3, is it?

Peter Cavellini.

Where's the Manual Box?

41 weeks 1 day ago

... well!? 

Just spent a week in the US with a new V6 Camaro – nice car in town or on the interstate, but as soon as you want to have fun on a twisty road it falls flat as a result of the auto gearbox (with flappy paddles).

 

I know the Alpina will be dynamically in a different league from the Chevy, but it could be so much better with a simple 5 or 6 speed...

 

.

41 weeks 1 day ago

I've always thought the Alpina BMW's were so much cooler than their in-house M car rivals and certainly better than the bombastic AMG Mercs.(erm, I've driven none of them)

Just one problem with this car though... someone's gone and stuck a STUPID rear wing on it! 

Love those wheels.

 

 R.I.P.     http://www.autocar.co.uk/forum

A 3.0 Turbo is a strange

41 weeks 1 day ago

A 3.0 Turbo is a strange choice for what's meant to be a track thoroughbred, it would be nice to see what Alpina could actually do with the M3 engine with some real work, rather than just winding up turbo boost for power.

The Wing.

41 weeks 6 hours ago

Don't like the wing thing either, but i guess it will be an option,so, i for one would delete it, if it had been color coded?....naaaa, still wouldn't have it.

Peter Cavellini.

It does not make me dream.

40 weeks 6 days ago

It does not make me dream. Where is the Alpina spirit?

Alpina B3

38 weeks 3 days ago

Same problem as every other Alpina, it shares one fundamental characteristic with every current Jaguar which is the lack of a manual option so to me it remains another missed opportunity (mind you unless I won Euromillions tonight neither is financially viable).

Having said that, as it is auto only using the straight 6 with turbo is probably a better base than the V8 would have been given its small capacity.

Perhaps A C Schnitzer can develop a proper high performance MANUAL 3 series just in case I get all 7 numbers one day!

Please register or login to post a comment.

Driven this week

  • Citroën C1 Connexion first drive review

    Citroën C1 Connexion first drive review

    First drive
    24 May 2013

    Facebook makes a car that won't appeal to all tastes in the way it looks or drives

  • Lexus IS

    Lexus IS

    Car review
    23 May 2013

    Do Mercedes and BMW need to be worried by the third-generation Lexus IS luxury saloon?

  • Kia Carens 1.6 GDi 1 first drive review

    Kia Carens 1.6 GDi 1 first drive review

    First drive
    23 May 2013

    We test Kia's latest MPV contender, equipped with a petrol engine and in entry-level trim

  • Ford Fiesta ST

    Ford Fiesta ST

    Car review
    22 May 2013

    The popular hatchback gets the hot ‘ST’ treatment

  • Lexus IS300h first drive review

    Lexus IS300h F Sport first drive review

    First drive
    21 May 2013

    Hybrid version of third-gen Lexus IS has predictable strengths, but it’s too devoted to calmness and efficiency to really enjoy driving