We sample the best that Maranello and Woking can offer to decide who sits at the top of the supercar class

People will tell you that the hypercar is a lie: a concoction of the sports car industry intended to make today’s million-pound crop of exotics seem instantly superior to their predecessors.

Which seems to reveal a simple truth hidden away behind the PR-spun apparent complexity of the modern car-making world – and a likeable one at that.

Unfortunately it’s a load of balls. Not necessarily because a McLaren P1 or a Bugatti Veyron necessarily belongs in a different frame of reference than an F1 or an EB110; more so because the 'new supercars’ – the class of super-sports cars that exists another rung down from the very top of the tree – have come to do so much for their owners, and mean so much for their makers, that they demand the recognition that label implies.

Spend 48 hours in the company of a Ferrari 458 Speciale or a McLaren 650S and you’ll find there’s absolutely no room for doubt. The speed, stature, sophistication and stunning desirability of these cars distinguish them from everything underneath them. 

Nobody, for instance, looks at the McLaren, curls their lip and mumbles “oh, it’s the little one; how disappointing.” People queue to take selfies, or stare out of top-deck coach windows.

These extraordinary machines show how much variety is now available for people with £200k to spend on a notionally perfect, 600bhp, mid-engined plaything. Question is, what’s your idea of perfection?

Read the Ferrari 458 Speciale review

At one level, 600bhp mid-engined V8s can only be so different. Ferrari and McLaren may have been playing out a thinly veiled car industry grudge match since Woking’s supercar-making ambitions hit top gear in 2011, but even in these latest highly developed forms, the 458 and the artist formerly known as ‘12C’ remain fundamentally alike. Both employ 90-deg big-bore V8 engines driving through dual-clutch gearboxes. Both are precisely 1203mm high.

There’s less than an inch between them on wheelbase, and little more than two on overall length. The McLaren uses interlinked hydraulics for body control, the Ferrari more simple adaptive dampers and roll bars, but both stick with electro-hydraulic power steering. The 650S uses a downsized engine with turbochargers and hybrid carbonfibre construction; the Ferrari has normal aspiration and aluminium in various clever alloys. And yet it’s the McLaren that weighs more in this test – albeit only 73kg more.

However similar a Ferrari 458 Speciale and a McLaren 650S might seem on paper, though, there’s a gulf between the roles that they play. At its heart, the 650S is everything you’ve ever wanted a road-going supercar to be but never believed it possible to find.

The Speciale is the blindingly exotic, diamond-hard track-day hero car you daydreamed about before you knew what real-world driving was like. Those two gratuitous simplifications do an injustice to the McLaren’s sporting focus and track suitability, and to the Ferrari’s docility and general good temper on the road – but they’ll do us just to get the ball rolling.

McLaren could only supply the 650S as a Spider for this comparison test. Thankfully, we know how insignificant a dynamic compromise comes from taking the roof off Woking’s carbonfibre-tubbed machine.

Test experience with the 12C has shown that this car loses nothing detectable from trading its fixed roof for a folding metal version; nothing on handling precision or ride refinement or cabin isolation or even on carrying capacity. The Spider’s simply better than the coupé because it’s got yet another string to an already packed bow.

It’s remarkable how much extra presence and visual impact McLaren has given this car with the P1-inspired styling tweaks that mark a 650S out from a 12C. The new front-end treatment in particular socks you straight between the eyes when you first see it, in a way the 12C never threatened to do. That new carbonfibre front splitter bristles with aggression but also looks functional. And that’s because it generates more high-speed downforce for the 650S than the 12C ever had.

Parked side by side, a 458 Italia out-shines a 12C, but the 650S isn’t so easily upstaged. In fact, it isn’t upstaged full stop. Despite enlarging the various air scoops all over the 458, fitting new ones in the bonnet and rear deck, littering the front bumper with sections of razor-like black wire mesh and fitting a rear diffuser that looks like it belongs on a Le Mans prototype, Ferrari has had the tables turned on it by Woking here. The 650S now makes the 458 – even the Speciale – look reserved, unadventurous, ordinary. Relatively, but unmistakably so.

The Ferrari’s cabin is a delicious monument to a singular purpose. Bedecked in carbonfibre, it’s missing all sorts: stereo, armrests, a normal centre console, even a glovebox, all notable by their absence You can’t help letting out an excited giggle in the face of that sort of commitment. 

And yet when you’re setting out from, say, the Brecon Beacons to Castle Combe circuit at the end of a long day, it doesn’t take long to get slightly jealous of the guy in the McLaren – the guy who’s got metres of downy Alcantara to stroke, a voice-operated navigation system to follow, a cruise control to set and a DAB radio with which to tune into the traffic reports. In the real world, niceties like that matter. 

As does material quality. Ferrari has never been brilliant at this; McLaren’s been good at it from day one, and is getting better. Which is why the worst, flimsiest fittings and switches on the 650S look and feel better than the best ones on the Speciale.

Read the McLaren 650S review

Despite its deficits to the McLaren on visual impact and static refinement, the Speciale undoubtedly makes you more excited to drive it. McLaren will work for decades to develop a brand that means half as much to people as Ferrari’s, and reputations built on cars as epic as 430 Scuderia, 599 GTO and 360 Challenge Stradale in recent years alone merit that initial priority.

More excited still as you begin to punt it around at low speed. Not that you ‘punt’ a Speciale. The steering is quite light but very direct and, relative to a standard Italia, benefits straight away from the incredible precision, response and contact patch feel that only a sticky set of Cup tyres can provide. Just guiding the car out of a motorway service station feels otherworldly. It's less like driving a family saloon than it is flying a helicopter.

With the Ferrari’s ‘manettino’ drive mode controller set to Race, the V8’s bark is at its loudest – which is loud, even bumbling along at 60mph in top. Two flicks of the left-hand paddle and a flex of your right foot brings a voice of righteous oblivion out of it. Response is instant, but the violence of the car’s performance needs revs and road space to build.

The Speciale is always quick, but only savagely so between 7000rpm and a deafening, sublimely excessively 9000rpm.

Meantime, life in the 650S is more effortless. It's less rousing but no less fast. McLaren’s new pistons and cylinder head for the Ricardo-built V8 haven’t made it any more of a virtuoso. The whistles and flutters of forced induction remain, audibly at least, like salt and pepper on supermarket sirloin. While the car growls and bellows at times, it never sings. 

But it shifts. You need to contrive a problem for this engine to negotiate; you must go out of your way to put a hurdle in its path in order to find much turbo lag. Full throttle in manual mode in a very high gear and from very low revs will do it – but frankly, so what? In anything approaching normal use, the engine gives you excellent response, as well as the kind lower mid-range torque that has only very recently been invented in Emilia-Romagna.

The Macca’s urge isn’t served up quite as sharply as the Ferrari’s, but at pretty much any speed the 650S feels slightly more potent. Pulling hard from 3500rpm, its swell of thrust makes it feel much quicker. 

So far, so even

If this test had been played out entirely on the road, it might have had a different winner. The Speciale’s grip and almost scary directness make it a thoroughly addictive treat for the thrill-seeker, with impressive civility at least in terms of rolling refinement. But the 650S feels like the bigger dynamic achievement – on the road. 

The Ferrari is taut-riding and a little bit jostling on a bad surface at low speed. Otherwise, it’s remarkably supple. The damper tuning is clever enough to allow a bit of initial compliance but then gives totally unflinching support under load. In short, the Speciale’s seems like an honest, natural chassis – albeit one with superpowers in terms of grip and alertness.

The McLaren’s chassis, by contrast, is utter voodoo. It never seems to react to two similarly sized bumps in quite the same way, ever softening and stiffening underneath you by tiny degrees. And yet the result is uncanny and the primary ride is brilliant. It’s slightly softer than the Ferrari’s, permitting more vertical movement but only the merest, gentlest bobbing gait, and always immaculately managed.

The McLaren steers better than the Ferrari, with a bit more weight and a slightly slower and more intuitive pace allied to more overall feel. It’s by a country mile the more mechanically refined car, because the Speciale is willfully unrefined. It does so many things so well, in fact, that what you’re about to read feels fraudulent to write.

Because somehow the Speciale overcomes that breadth of ability with one knockout trick: by being absolutely stunning when driven fast. Really fast. You can’t drive it fast enough on the road to plumb the depths of its genius, so you go to a track. When you arrive, the car fails a noise test – so you appeal to the marshals and get on anyway. You’re a Ferrari owner; these things are expected. 

Out on track, you can finally wrap your head around the rampant speed in that steering. The precision manifest in every part of the driving experience doesn’t disintegrate under pressure, but only becomes more compelling.

In Race mode, the car’s clever diff and stability controls look after you so consummately that, when you’re driving well, you simply don’t know they’re working. Turn everything off and the car follows your inputs as crisply as a conductor’s baton, to whatever angle you like. Otherwise, there’s enough stability in the mix – just – to forgive a momentary error of judgement, but absolutely no more. And not so much as a hint of slop or lost motion anywhere. 

This is the Speciale’s level; it’s intimidating, then intoxicating. The McLaren, excellent as it is elsewhere, just isn’t quite on it. The 650S isn’t as sharp or delicately balanced on the circuit as the 458 once you push through the final tenth of its dynamic potential. 

More importantly, the McLaren isn’t ever as immersive as the Speciale: nothing it’s good at is quite that good. Still your move then, Woking. The grudge match continues. And you can’t take your eyes off it for a second.

Ferrari 458 Speciale

Price £208,065 0-62mph 3.0sec Top speed 202mph Economy 23.9mpg (with HELE option) CO2 275g/km (with HELE option) Kerb weight 1395kg Engine V8, 4497cc, petrol Installation Mid, longitudinal, RWD Power 597bhp at 9000rpm Torque 398lb ft at 6000rpm Gearbox 7-speed dual-clutch automatic

McLaren 650S Spider

Price £215,250 0-62mph 3.0sec Top speed 207mph Economy 24.2mpg CO2 275g/km Kerb weight 1330kg (dry) Engine V8, 3799cc, twin-turbo, petrol Installation Mid, longitudinal, RWD Power 641bhp at 7500rpm Torque 500lb ft at 6000rpm Gearbox 7-spd dual-clutch automatic

Our Verdict

Ferrari 458 Speciale

Ferrari's last-word 458 brings unparalleled poise and purpose

Join the debate

Comments
18

TBC

2 July 2014
One wonders, when reading such a report, quite what heights these cars successors will reach in a decade's time?

2 July 2014
So the Ferrari is better on the track, and the McLaren better on the road. Where do you spend more time? There is a spectrum between optimum for the track and optimum for the road, and these cars occupy different points on that spectrum, so how is one the winner and one the loser? If you want optimum for the track, why not get a racing car and a trailer? After all, you can obviously afford it.

2 July 2014
As 275not599 says, you would want the best car for the road, since its a road car! But anyway, why compare the hardcore Speciale against the "normal" 650S? The normal 458 would be a much better comparison as tehy are both road focused cars. And to do a "Road test" and say the winner is the best car on the track screams on bias. PLUS YOUR TESTING IT AGAINST A CONVERTIBLE! Of course it wont be as dynamic despite what McLaren may tell you.

--------------------

 

 

2 July 2014
McLaren every single day of the week for me.... as a Spider and I rather like that colour too! I don't think i'd dare take a car of that value on a track based on the usual performance of other people on the day - i'd be too scared. I'll buy the McLaren and given i could afford and justify that, an Exige V6 for the track, or maybe a Caterham of some sort...

2 July 2014
Its always the same with you journos. The clear winner here is the 650s as its a true road car you could track if you wished, where as the fezzy is a track focused car you can use on road happily. But guess what, just like in every BMW v Mercedes test the Merc is the better car but the Beemer wins as it is a " drivers " car lol, Mercedes drivers love driving too and Mercedes cars are also true drivers cars. I digest....:) The 650s is the winning road car here and the fact the ferrari gets the nod ( like it did over at the other magazines road test which concluded the ferrari was the sexier twin sister to the more staid wifey material of the 12c ) is journos trying not to upset poor old ferrari. The 650s has the side mirrors in the correct place also... End of line.

2 July 2014
without wanting to state the glaringly obvious, both cars are the more sporting, track based version of the regular "normal" models.. no? Then why not assess them for their intended environment and function? Noting what the 650S and Speciale is like in any other environment, like for instance in a commuting role, while worth noting, is largely irrelevant. Criticising them for what they are not primarily designed for would be like canning a Jaguar XJ for not being good as an off road cross country car. Sure, some owners may never see a track day with these cars, but then, so what? The rational for such cars is a more involving, pure, driving experience than the std car. McLaren's own words and their aim with the changes they built into the 650C over its sister car. Lets just celebrate the strengths and merits of each car. In the end, as always, it's a case of each to their own... and yes I agree some "road testers" can be hugely misguided in the key criteria they use to asses cars (but that does not seem to be the case in this comparo).

2 July 2014
ShvsIrns wrote:
... and yes I agree some "road testers" can be hugely misguided in the key criteria they use to asses cars (but that does not seem to be the case in this comparo).
Ok not wishing to bash journos or road testers, Steve does a very very good job of describing the pure thrills of driving these cars to those of us who as yet haven't, however I have one tiny request of hiom and all other testers and magazine journos. Please, Please, Please stop describing cars as weapons. It is just wrong. Also there is No such thing as a baby P1 or a baby La Ferarri. I just wanted to get that off my not so hairy chest...

2 July 2014
Nicely put. The trouble is, there are fewer people taken by what the 650S offers, than there are those who are drawn to the 458 Italia/Speciale and really this is something Mclaren ought to have worked out after bringing forth the MC12. Design I think McLaren should review the approach it has taken to designing the 650S. Its undoubtedly a mismatch front to rear, and all be it 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder' no one can dispute the fact Giselle Bundchen is more attractive a woman than Davina McCall, and in the same way, here we have a Ferrari which is so obviously more attractive than the hippo faced McLaren (although I wouldn't order the Fezza in the colour scheme shown). Engine The Ferrari engine is the epitome of a masterpiece -it has the highest bhp per litre as an NA engine, revs higher and has won numerous awards and Ferrari can singlehandedly take credit for this, whilst McLaren's engine is not only produced by someone else (Ricardo) but ultimately cannot match the excitement the Ferrari unit offers, which brings me onto: Pedigree The Ferrari is the most unadulterated (pure) super car out there in that the Company produces or is heavily involved in the production of all the key parts of the car. Needless to state, as it's performance is also one of the best it's going to draw the crowds Heritage 60 Years of Racing and performance at the highest level, translated into its road cars. McLaren have a history of making bodies for race cars... Overall then McLaren has a very difficult task in its hands and i don't think their strategy of making three cars from one with what appear to be minimal revisions is going to work in the long term. They need more P1s i.e. cars that bring something significantly new and distinct to this game. I wish them all the best.

2 July 2014
gaco1 wrote:
Nicely put. no one can dispute the fact Giselle Bundchen is more attractive a woman than Davina McCall, and in the same way, here we have a Ferrari which is so obviously more attractive than the hippo faced McLaren (although I wouldn't order the Fezza in the colour scheme shown).
Giselle Bundchen is typical model ( you could have chosen Kate Moss also ). Davina is something else completely. You have been sucked in and is why people like you would choose the Ferrari. You think you are buying into all that. And thats the reason people who don't want to be seen as the Ferrari set would always be secure in the knowledge their Mclaren was quietly superior.

2 July 2014
Ha, OK Mr Dog, you are SO riight! The market is eminently foolish to buy into engineering excellence, exclusivity and heritage; so many stupid people out there buying old houses that have stood the test of time, mechanical watches and cars (only of course to make more money on them further down the line), these idiots eh...? ;-) Oh, and looking at the two cars, the simile used was apt, the McLaren 650S is ugly. But hey, be the 'wise' man and spend your £200k+ on one instead and lose half that in three years (yes, that's right, you are looking at resale value less than what a 2009 430 Scuderia with comparable miles is going for).

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • First Drive
    22 December 2014
    Entry-level diesel MPV shares its three-cylinder engine with Mini but, due to long gearing, lacks the authoritative punch of a convincing premium product
  • Car review
    17 December 2014
    The replacement for the CL grand tourer has some big boots to fill
  • Mercedes-Benz CLS 350 AMG Line Shooting Brake review
    First Drive
    16 December 2014
    Elegant, alluring and with some welcome improvements, but not good enough to lead the class
  • First Drive
    15 December 2014
    Hushed, flexible and remarkable value for money. Arguably more fit-for-purpose than any other ‘S’.
  • 2015 Mazda CX-3 review
    First Drive
    12 December 2014
    The Mazda CX-3 has style and substance, and deserves consideration for anyone wanting a compact urban SUV. Here’s hoping Mazda gets the price and equipment right