More than three-quarters of members of the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders stated that if a referendum on EU membership were held tomorrow, a ‘remain’ outcome would be best for their businesses

More than three-quarters of the UK motoring industry believes the UK leaving the EU (known as 'Brexit') would be harmful to business, a new survey has found.

It revealed that 88% of large motor industry businesses were against leaving the EU, while 73% of smaller and medium sized enterprises wanted to stay. 77% of the industry as a whole agreed Europe was best for business.

The UK’s motor industry, represented by the Society of Motor Manufacturers & Traders (SMMT) members, announced the findings after the results from an independent survey compiled by ComRes were released.

This contrasts with 9% of respondents who thought an exit from the EU would benefit business. 14% answered saying they were unsure of its effects, reflecting the level of uncertainty around the issue.

Leading voices in support of remaining in the EU include senior members of Toyota, BMW and Vauxhall. Mike Hawes, SMMT chief executive, said: “The message from UK Automotive is clear – being in Europe is vital for the future of this industry and to secure jobs, investment and growth."

He said 77% of cars built in the UK were exported last year, with 57% of those going to European customers. 1.3 million British-built cars were exported last year – the highest on record – and the industry accounted for a significant 11.8% of all UK exports, worth £15 billion to the economy. The industry employs 800,000 people. “Leaving would put many of these jobs at risk.”

Tony Walker, Toyota’s deputy managing director, suggested his company’s investment in the UK could be hindered if the country left Europe. “Toyota has two manufacturing plants in the UK. We export nearly 90% of our UK-made cars, the vast majority to EU countries.

“After a careful assessment, we believe [Brexit would add] some tariffs or tariff barriers, leading to a loss of efficiency in business as well as a loss of harmonisation in vehicle regulation.

“Leaving would open up a very uncertain future of technical difficulties and increasing costs.”

A full statement on the issue further set out Toyota's stance on the referendum, specifically praising the "free access to the European market, the availability of a skilled workforce, and the presence of a strong network of suppliers." 

"We support thousands of jobs in our manufacturing operations and more widely in our supply chain and distribution network. We manufacture vehicles, engines and parts and nearly 90 per cent of our UK-built vehicles are exported."

Toyota Europe CEO Johan van Zyl added: "We respect that the UK’s future relationship with the European Union is a matter for the British people to decide, and it is not our intention to participate in the campaign... We are committed to our people and investments, so we are concerned that leaving would create additional business challenges.  As a result we believe continued British membership of the EU is best for our operations and their long term competitiveness."

Dr Ian Robertson, a member of BMW’s Board of Management, added: “Our experience shows that the free movement of components, finished products and skilled workers within the EU is extremely beneficial to British-based business.

“Even if we left EU, the regulations of the EU will still apply. It’s very clear that Britain’s role as a rule-shaper, rather than a rule taker, is very important.”

Meanwhile, Audi boss Rupert Stadler said the UK was seen as "a good partner" of the EU, saying "it has been a mutually beneficial partnership for the past years. We appreciate the UK market and assume we'll continue to do so."

Speaking to Autocar at the Geneva motor show, Mercedes-Benz boss Dieter Zetsche said that a Brexit would cause "tremendous damage" to his firm's European plans. "In the last 70 years Europe has progressed from being a continent at war, to a single community. We don't all pull in the same direction and at the same time, but it would be terrible to see this process put into reverse." He also said that the economic consequences of a Brexit would be "much more serious for the UK than for the rest of Europe."

PSA Peugeot-Citroen boss Carlos Tavares also spoke out on the referendum: "This is something we can do nothing about. The people of the UK must make their own decisions. The business risk comes from a loss of revenue around currency and trading. The situation is that if the pound weakens and hits profits, then prices will rise to compensate. Ultimately, we hope the UK will stay - we see that as better than it fighting for itself.”

Nissan boss Mr. Carlos Ghosn recently released a statement regarding the EU referendum, saying: "We have a rich heritage in the UK with 30 years of manufacturing and engineering presence, and remain committed to building and engineering cars in the country.  Last year we produced more than 475,000 vehicles in the UK – 80 percent of which are exported.

“Our preference as a business is, of course, that the UK stays within Europe – it makes the most sense for jobs, trade and costs. For us, a position of stability is more positive than a collection of unknowns. However, this is ultimately a matter for the British people to decide.”

Nigel Stein, chief executive of British engineering firm GKN (responsible for designing the drivelines for nearly half of the world’s cars), believes the UK will struggle to compete with EU business alone: “A vote to leave will not mean manufacturing investment disappears overnight, but over time a UK outside the EU will be disadvantaged and will lose the investment it needs to maintain our industries.

“The relative size of the pan-European market compared to the UK market means it would be hard for us to compete alone. GKN’s European manufacturing plants would likely become more important to business [if Brexit went ahead].”

Stein agreed with Robertson’s comments, saying: “If we left, it is likely that we will end up with a free-trade-like deal that will put the UK at a significant disadvantage compared to our European competitors.”

Smaller businesses also argued that EU membership gave them a competitive advantage on a global scale. Gamil Magal, Group chief executive of Magal Engineering, said: “we benefit heavily from a free movement of employees across Europe. Our rapid growth would be hampered without this.”

Magal added: “Does anybody really believe that the EU would offer an independent UK better trade terms than it does to those who are within it?”

Almost all SMMT members agreed that remaining in a market where there are more than 500 million consumers was essential to ensure the UK remained competitive though many did agree some reform was needed.

Hawes said the SMMT wanted Britain to remain in Europe, but with more power to influence EU business decisions. “If we stay in Europe, we really hope David Cameron will make the most of it.”

The UK public will vote on whether to stay in the EU in a referendum held on 23 June 2016.

Our Verdict

Seventh generation Vauxhall Astra
The seventh-generation Vauxhall Astra seems to be a collection of General Motors' latest and greatest technology

Is it seventh time lucky for Vauxhall’s British-built Focus fighter?

Join the debate

Comments
29

3 March 2016
So if being in Europe is so 'vital for the future of this industry and to secure jobs, investment and growth' - why did Ford move it's Transit engine factory from Southampton to non-EU Turkey in 2013...? Just askin'.

3 March 2016
The UK car industry is over if we are stupid enough to leave the EU and no amount of smart remarks about one plant are going to change that.

8 March 2016
An interesting point. No doubt labour costs were a big factor. But Turkey is doing all it can to get INTO the EU, even trying to cut deals on the current refugee crisis. This article has drawn out the usual suspects who see an opportunity to post an anti-EU rant. We are all entitled to an opinion - but it should be an informed one, and the results from this survey are pretty clear.

8 March 2016
Meaning 96% lied, one way or the other.

8 March 2016
Apologies, but you get the point.

14 June 2016
You have made a point with me-again this site-which is highly relevant. It explains WHY D Cameron wants to get Turkey IN the EU but attempts to sport the alternative view that there are reasons Turkey will not do so in the short term.This latter fact of Camerons preaching suggests he is not so sure really but afraid his position will be affected when june23rd is reached this year. A selfie bite as it were. Yes I can realise why he is more honestly seeking to ensure the car industry is our forte when Turkey gets in with all the money he is found putting into this remote country.We could be using this money now in this country and he knows this It is aggravating political opinion.I noted this aspect re Turkey when seeing the PARTY BROADCAST only two days ago on tv by BREXIT.They do NOT trust D CAMERON with this subject of WHO will be,or should be,IN the EU.Thanks for reading this late aside.(H/\S).
(h/\s)

3 March 2016
Did you ask any questions at this press conference ? Or is this just a nice bit of PR for the In Europe camp. In your article you state that 57% of our car exports find homes in Europe so that leave 43% going elsewhere. Did it not occur to you to ask if that 43% was a growing figure ? Do you have any thoughts on this subject of your own ? Based on this article I must assume you don't or perhaps your just not allowed to express what you think as journalists anymore preferring to just repeat what your told. Come on AutoCar this isn't the Daily Mail we expect that shit rag to inform us we are going to be overrun with immigrants and all loose are homes and jobs and terrorism will be an everyday event. One more thing how does China manage to successfully manufacture and export it's products without being an EU member. I think people in this Country forget that we led the world in innovation, manufacturing and exporting before being totally misled and deceived by the Euro Project.

 Offence can only be taken not given- so give it back!

14 June 2016
You have made a point with me here;it does not come over well by BREXIT followers I have read so far that this is a growth level to date;ie it may or may not be improved upon In fact it would HAVE to improve under pressure following BREXIT.There is one other factor which the main car market does not overmention.I once attended tech coll in 1975 plus.It voted the electric car too expensive and then'maybe if prices eventually changed'ie oil refs inferred;then it would only yield 10pc of the market anywhere(I suppose anywhere).Even so D CAMERON is saying he wants to be 'in on this in EU'onTV.Now I wonder whether this is-of itself-a happy matter that the electric car should start a trade struggle with the main cars of our type?Should one accept that,in context of the EU vote, this '10pc'(college vote 1975)will become apriori and offset the amount of lolly obtainable at present from ordinary cars? Why on earth mention this innovation?I cant imagine Arabia liking this idea at all.What happens to the normal car prices when this innovation catches on with D CAMERON? Is he really the car manufacturers best friend? Apologies only to car part manufacturers who may think it doesn't matter with them.Thanks for reading this late note.
(h/\s)

3 March 2016
- not taking risks. Not surprising BMW do not want Brexit. A free trade agreement would leave companies in a very similar, if not identical, position. We are already outside euro currency/ Schengen Agreement and don't seem to suffer trade problems because of this. I am sure if we had joined these, and now wanted to leave, we would be told this would hinder businesses and cost jobs also. I don't think being 'in' is really a trade issue, its more to do with believing in a euro wide project and if this is beneficial in a wider sense, controlling country's who might otherwise join Russia or China ?

3 March 2016
Stop living in a fantasy world. The EU is the free trade agreement. Brexit means tearing up the free trade agreement. Every country in central and eastern Europe gets a veto on any possible replacement deal - you know; those countries whose citizens we would just have told to sod off and who stand to gain from a massive wave of investment as the car companies previously based in the UK move their production. That would not go well.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Ferrari GTC4 Lusso
    First Drive
    29 June 2016
    Ferrari's four-wheel drive GT car has been updated. We drive the GTC4 Lusso, replacement for the FF, and find out if it is worthy of its famous name
  • Audi A3 Sportback 2.0 TDI S line
    First Drive
    28 June 2016
    We've driven the facelifted version of the ever-popular Audi A3 Sportback in 2.0 TDI guise on UK roads for the first time
  • Audi Q2 1.4 TFSI S-Line
    First Drive
    26 June 2016
    The Audi Q2 is the German brand’s smallest SUV yet. Can it impress in production guise on European roads?
  • Ford S-Max Vignale
    First Drive
    24 June 2016
    The Ford S-Max Vignale is the company's premium executive express. Can it really be worth the extra over the standard S-Max?
  • Volkswagen Scirocco GTS
    First Drive
    23 June 2016
    Still a really fun and likeable coupé but the extra power doesn't justify the VW Scirocco GTS's high price