Currently reading: McLaren 650S faster than F1 hypercar
McLaren's new £195k, 641bhp supercar builds on 12C to ramp up driver enjoyment; claimed top speed of 207mph and 0-62mph in 3.0sec

The new McLaren 650S is faster than the iconic McLaren F1 hypercar, according to its maker. McLaren says the 650S coupé, which will cost £195,250, can reach 62mph in 3.0sec and 124mph in 8.4sec – a full second faster than the F1. The Spider will cost £215,250 and matches the coupé to 62mph but is 0.2sec slower to 124mph.

The new McLaren 650S is capable of hitting 207mph and can cover the standing quarter mile in 10.5sec, which is 0.6sec less than the F1. The car is on display at the Geneva motor show, where a new 650S Spider has also been revealed.

Despite the 650S's prodigious performance, McLaren claims 24.2mpg on the combined cycle and 275g/km of CO2. McLaren says it is one of the most efficient cars in its class.

The car is closely related to the 12C but is £20,000 more expensive and closer in styling to the recently launched £860,000 P1 hybrid hypercar. It also incorporates a basket of detailed revisions that improve performance in all areas but major on driver involvement.

The changes are designed to counter criticism of the 12C from early owners, and to incorporate relevant know-how gained from the P1, which is now in its delivery phase.

McLaren's 650S gets more standard equipment than the 12C, including lightweight forged alloy wheels, LED headlights, an Alcantara interior, carbon-ceramic brakes, revised sat-nav and a DAB radio as part of a sophisticated, screen-based audio system. The car also gets new, wider ‘650’-design lightweight wheels and Pirelli P Zero Corsa tyres.

Options include fixed-back carbon racing seats based on those in the P1, an electric steering column to aid ingress and egress, a rear parking camera and carbonfibre trims.

The 650S, whose name reflects the enhanced output of its 3.8-litre turbo V8 in metric horsepower, is likely to be portrayed widely as the 12C they’d like to have built in the first place.

However, McLaren insists that the original model will stay in production at £176,000 and will find ready sales in markets where aggressive taxation swells ex-factory prices.

Sales volume for the two cars is expected to stay at about 1200 units a year. The big sales boost for McLaren will come after next year’s launch of a £120,000 mid-engined McLaren, codenamed P13.

The 650S is instantly recognisable from its P1-style all-LED headlights and other cues that are part of a new McLaren design style language created under chief designer Frank Stephenson. McLaren says that the 650S is faithful an early promise made by group chairman Ron Dennis to launch a substantial model every year. About 25 per cent of the 650S’s components are different from those in the 12C.

The engine has modifications to its cylinder head and pistons and adopts new McLaren engine management software. Power climbs to 641bhp from the 616bhp of later 12Cs. There is an even greater boost to torque, which now peaks at 500lb ft, a figure developed between 3000rpm and 7000rpm.

Back to top

To accompany the punchier engine, the 650S’s seven-speed dual-clutch automatic gearbox gets quicker, better-controlled gearshifts that make use of new McLaren patents. The 650S’s 0-62mph time is 3.0sec (a drop of 0.3sec compared to the 12C's metric) and the 0-125mph time is more than a second quicker at 8.4sec.

Spring rates have been stiffened by 22 per cent front and rear for better body control and are accompanied by revised damper mounts and rates. However, McLaren insists that the 12C’s ‘magic carpet’ ride survives in the 650S.

Among other chassis tuning changes are subtle adjustments to brake boost, to ABS and ESP intrusion and to the workings of the active aerodynamics that boost both engine cooling under extreme conditions and aerodynamic stability under brakes and during cornering. Peak downforce is now 40 per cent higher than that of the 12C and better balanced front to rear.

Listing all of these gains still doesn’t fully convey the extent of the 650S’s performance boost, according to McLaren’s head of product, Jamie Corstorphine. “The 12C is already an extremely practical, easy-driving car,” he said. “But when you drive a 650S, you soon appreciate that it has an even greater breadth of capability, plus more ability when it really counts.

“We haven’t built the 650S just for ten-tenths driving, and you don’t have to be a professional to enjoy it to the full. It feels special on any level; it’s up to the owner to choose the model he wants.”

Read more Geneva motor show news.

McLaren 650S technical specification

Engine

Layout Longitudinal mid-engine, RWD 

Configuration V8 twin turbo, 3799cc 

Power 641bhp at 7250rpm

Torque 500lb ft at 6000rpm

Back to top

Transmission 7 Speed SSG 

 

Chassis

Body structure Carbonfibre MonoCell with aluminium front and rear frames

Wheelbase 2670mm 

Brakes carbon ceramic discs with forged aluminium hubs, 394mm (f), 380mm (r)

Tyres 235/35 R19 (f), 305/30 R20 (r), Pirelli P Zero Corsa

Wheels 19x8.5J (f) / 20x11J (r)

Track 1656mm (f), 1583mm (r)

Length 4512mm

Width 2093mm

Height 1199mm

Dry weight 1330kg

Active aerodynamics McLaren airbrake

Suspension ProActive chassis control 

ProActive chassis control modes Normal / Sport / Track

Powertrain modes Winter / Normal / Sport / Track

 

Performance data

CO2 275g/km

Fuel consumption 24.2mpg (combined)

Power to weight (with lightweight options) 493 bhp per tonne

Top speed (650S Spider) 207mph

0-62mph 3.0sec

0-124mph 8.4sec

0-186mph 25.4sec

¼ mile 10.5sec at 139mph

62-0mph 30.5m

124-0mph 123m 

186-0mph 271m 

Additional reporting by Stuart Milne, 27 February

Steve Cropley

Steve Cropley Autocar
Title: Editor-in-chief

Steve Cropley is the oldest of Autocar’s editorial team, or the most experienced if you want to be polite about it. He joined over 30 years ago, and has driven many cars and interviewed many people in half a century in the business. 

Cropley, who regards himself as the magazine’s “long stop”, has seen many changes since Autocar was a print-only affair, but claims that in such a fast moving environment he has little appetite for looking back. 

He has been surprised and delighted by the generous reception afforded the My Week In Cars podcast he makes with long suffering colleague Matt Prior, and calls it the most enjoyable part of his working week.

Join the debate

Comments
6
Add a comment…
gonif 27 February 2014

Bland? Beautiful? Whatever.

Bland? Beautiful? Whatever. You 'petrol heads' really need to get a life. It's all subjective. Apart from the fact that its capabilities are far greater than is useable, nobody here will ever get to drive one anyway, so it just doesn't matter. The journalists are just scribbling car-porn: they couldn't afford it either. Blather all you wish, none of you have the ability to drive these cars to their max. If you could you wouldn't have to waste your time contributing to this nonsense.
Leslie Brook 28 February 2014

gonif wrote:Bland? Beautiful?

gonif wrote:

Bland? Beautiful? Whatever. You 'petrol heads' really need to get a life. It's all subjective. Apart from the fact that its capabilities are far greater than is useable, nobody here will ever get to drive one anyway, so it just doesn't matter. The journalists are just scribbling car-porn: they couldn't afford it either. Blather all you wish, none of you have the ability to drive these cars to their max. If you could you wouldn't have to waste your time contributing to this nonsense.

Why are you wasting your time contributing to this nonsense?

kendwilcox47 4 March 2014

F1

So this new car is faster than the F1,well the F1 is some 17-18 years old now also
it had non of the techno mumbo jumbo that this car has.
Take all that techno stuff off it and I wonder?,also the weight,for all the money
spent and all the carbon and the like not good.
The M600 made by a very small company comes in some 130kg lighter,it might
also be the better car?.
Sorry I see a lot of hype.
TBC 27 February 2014

Fan

I'm surprised by just how many Ferrari fan-boys have commented on this, but there again, why am I surprised?
Driving 27 February 2014

why go up when down is clear

McLaren should take two cylidners away from the V8 and create a 450+hp 100K supercar with all those clever twin clutches and hydraulic suspension. that would sell with that carbon monotub. this 650 seems like an afterthough with 12c sales slowing and wanting to clear up as many parts bin as possible