Thu
Jul 09 2009

Jaguar XJ - bold, but is it a step too far?

Hilton Holloway

The new Jaguar XJ is one of the few new cars that can truly be described as a ‘mould breaker’.

It breaks the big Jaguar mould set in 1968 by the first XJ.



See more pictures and read details of the new Jaguar XJ here - Jaguar XJ: full details and pics

So venerated was the XJ’s design, that even when it was working on the current, all-aluminium XJ, Jaguar felt it couldn’t move away from the low-rise look.

In fact, company engineers had to work very hard to get the XJ’s aluminium panels to stay in shape when they were stamped out.

In truth, Jaguar was literally working against the grain of high-tech material by trying to bend it into an old-school shape.

The new XJ has been freed from such aesthetic restrictions. But it also marks an unexpected leap into the future. Viewed in light of the success of the conventionally handsome, and highly successful, XF saloon, the XJ is something of a surprise.

Rather than building on the XF, the new XJ is much more of a risky move. The low nose and high tail is expectedly modern. However, the devil is in the detailed execution.

The big, bold, grille (which is mounted proud of the rest of the nose) looks like a giant jet air intake. It also dwarfs the slim headlamp units that were first seen on the C-XF concept.

So while the front end is modern and agreeably progressive, the rear is much more unexpected. The combination of upright light clusters that wrap over into the rear wing tops, the unusual boot shut line and the blacked out c-pillar probably add up to the most unexpected Jaguar since the XJ-S was unveiled in 1975.

When I first saw the XJ in the flesh, I have to admit that I struggled slightly with the tall, wrap-over, lights although I can see a welcome hint of Italian glamour about the rear.

The black C-pillar, however, remains a mystery to me. It is a plastic moulding that lines up with the rear screen, but not much else. It is also a slightly different shade of black to the surrounding rubber seals and the black tinting of the edges of the surrounding windows.

Add these hurdles to the fact that there are a significant number of cut and shut lines around the rear of the glasshouse and the result – to my eyes at least – just doesn’t achieve the effect of the side windows sweeping around into the rear screen.

Sure, the XJ would look more of conventional limo without the black C-pillar, but we might see a few owners asking dealers to paint the plastic cover in body colour.

The same thing is happening to a few Mini Clubmans around my way because owners don’t like the wide black strip around the rear doors.

There’s no doubt that the new XJ is imposing and satisfyingly modern – especially at the front end. It’s just that, initially at least, your eye can’t help straying back to a styling flourish that interrupts up the car’s flowing surfaces.

Only time and feedback from buyers will reveal this as either a clever, futuristic move or a step too far. But it won’t seriously hamper the first truly modern XJ for four decades.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,


Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Hilton Holloway

Has two product design degrees and used to design mountain bikes. Realised that cars were a lot more interesting in 1990, and has been writing about them ever since.

Comments

obamabeach July 9, 2009 10:43 AM

"Only time and feedback from buyers will reveal this as either a clever, futuristic move or a step too far. But it won’t seriously hamper the first truly modern XJ for four decades."

- illogical. if this is 'a step too far' who can it not but hamper, seriously, this car? Utter nonsense. If buyers reject it due to its jarring, incoherent from front to back, 'challenging' design  sales will not materialise. QED.

I know you had to rush this out but at least follow and be true to the logic of your own argument. Have the courage to say that this WILL make or break this car. Hence the nervousness abroad that one can cut with a knife and the sharp intakes of breath going on in Autocar Towers and amongst Jaguar lovers.

phillio3 July 9, 2009 11:39 AM

The XF is a stunningly average looking car and the XJ doesn't move the game on much further. I wouldn't call it mould breaking. XF front end; Citroen C6 meets Bentley Continental rear end. It's nothing special is it?

horse whisperer July 9, 2009 1:15 PM

well when i first saw the pics last night i would have shot ian callum on site! but taking another view of the car i would shake his hand and say well done for doing something different and brave, very few car companies would sign off a car as radical as the X351.

Uncle Mellow July 9, 2009 1:28 PM

Not so much a step too far , as a couple of steps in the wrong direction.

kurtverbose July 9, 2009 2:35 PM

People bought the BMW 5 series even though the back is hideous, because the engineering is so good.

I hope it's the same with the XJ although I'm not sure they've pushed the engineering on much.

What we haven't seen yet is the interior and I'm hopeful that will be really special. I think it will be with that glass roof.

I will also hold judgment until I see one in more detail. I think that rear will look better in the flesh than in those photo's.

kurtverbose July 9, 2009 2:36 PM

Actually, in the pic Hilton has above, from rear three quarters, it does look good. From dead astern it looks yuk.

michael knight July 9, 2009 6:16 PM

Some people don't like it - fantastic. Other people bitched about the traditional Jag styling, too bad. It's what is needed to move Jag forward sharply into the 21st century. I'm not saying it's the perfectly-designed car, but the fact that it challenges people is necessary for Jag's future survival.

Sam_C July 9, 2009 8:53 PM

I really like it - but I really like the XF as well. As a younger chap, the new Jags are appealing (I always liked the old XK8, but thought that it was a bit like the car your dad would drive!). BMW have managed to shift cars despite some challenging styling - the new shape 5 series has been a real grower, and so have the new 3 series (the 7 is still pig ugly).

I hope it does well for them - no doubt it'll end up like the old XJ - a craking buy in a few years when the depreciation has ravaged it!

david RS July 9, 2009 9:04 PM

Wrong direction : inside and outside.

And for a Jaguar...

My first reactions for the exterior and the interior were bizzare. It won't be a classic. It's a pity.

While the XF had made a success of the bet of the modernity and the class, outside and inside. The balance, always the balance. This XJ should badly age.

But where are the designers?

You should wait for the next XJ to find a classic.

lbft July 10, 2009 1:22 AM

Love it. A bit ahead of its time, but just what Jag needs. The Supercharged versions will be awesome to drive.

kowalski99 July 10, 2009 10:15 AM

It amazes me how conservative people on this forum are.

The car is challenging but:

1) it looks interesting

2) it has soul which NONE of its competitors have.

And for that, i applaud you Jaguar!

turini July 10, 2009 10:15 AM

The old car was/is a classic but the design needed to change. This is different - completely - and will doubtless need to be seen in the flesh. Initially though I like most of it.

What a shame there was no similar forum back in 1968 - a comparison with todays 'opinions' would be interesting.

theop July 10, 2009 10:52 AM

Love it too....

tony2x July 10, 2009 7:00 PM

There is a big dose of Citroen C6 in the rear end and for me that is no bad thing.  I love challenging car designs, I was always a defender of the Bangle BMWs and they have now become accepted car designs which are being copied left right and centre by the competition.

Hats off to Jaguar for breaking with tradition in such a radical way.  I dont know how successful it will be because they aren't starting with such a positive brand perception like BMW has.  I think it was far less of a gamble for the Bavarians but I also recognise that Jaguar had no choice but to take a risk such as this.  They really couldn't release *another* retro style, nor could they simply make a bigger XF.

The low, swooping roof line is gorgeous and the front end treatment is pure aggression.  I am going to reserve judgment until I've seen botht cars in the metal but at first glance I prefer the exterior of the XF to the XJ.  But when it comes to the interior the XJ beats them all.  I can't think of a car interior that does it for me as much as this one.  Breathtaking.

RichardHo November 22, 2009 5:04 AM

It seems to be that the new Jags try to imitate the Lexus - the XF's profile is similar to the GS-300's, remove the leaper badge and no one would have guessed it's a Jag.  Now the XJ's rear end looks lumpy and those rear lights are a reap-off from the Lexus SC convertible. Gimmicks like blanking off the rear pillars with plastic only underlines its paucity in design language. Jags used to have a strong feline stance and grace - now they only look fat!

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 8.2.12

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>