Wed
Nov 18 2009

An Olympic-sized scandal

Hilton Holloway
The news that BMW has won the bid to become to official vehicle supplier to the 2012 London Olympics is a serious disappointment.

Not because there’s likely to be much wrong with the next-generation 1-series and 3-series, but because the Blue Propeller has succeeded in crowding out a much more innovative rival.



Nissan was one of the 2012 bidders, promising to supply a fleet of 4000 vehicles, at least 2000 of which would have been the Nissan LEAF electric hatch. Had Nissan won, French electricity supplier EDF would have helped install charging points through the capital.

The upshot would have been a huge boost for electric car infrastructure in the capital – a city with some of the worst diesel-fired pollution in Europe.

The infrastructure would have lasted long after the games had departed, opening the way for electric delivery vehicles and taxis as well as releasing 2000 barely-used LEAFs onto the second hand market.

As Autocar reports, 2012 sources actively dismissed the idea of using electric vehicles as unreliable and unproven.

Really? I drive the LEAF prototype last month and it was hugely impressive. Moreover the car’s standard range would have coped with five return journeys from central London to the Olympic site on a single charge.

And with the use of three-phase charging points, the re-charge time would have been just a couple of hours.

Worse still, Nissan is considering building the LEAF in Sunderland, partly because Nissan will be building LEAF batteries at the plant. Let’s hope the chances of building the LEAF in Britain hasn’t been harmed.

So we could have had 2000 UK-built electric vehicles running around at the 2012 games. Indeed, Boris Johnson wanted to see a mass take-up of electric vehicles in 2012, but it seems the London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (LOCOG) are making decisions that affect the future of the capital, not the democratically elected London Mayor.

The simple truth is that BMW outbid Nissan to win the deal. LOCOG has traded a fat cash contribution for a once in a generation chance to install an electric vehicle infrastructure.

So much for the 2012 Olympic ‘legacy’.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Hilton Holloway

Has two product design degrees and used to design mountain bikes. Realised that cars were a lot more interesting in 1990, and has been writing about them ever since.

Comments

beachland2 November 18, 2009 5:40 PM

I want to see electric cars replacing diesels. But for me it shows how useless they are at present, the cars for the Olympics are required to be used for upto 18 hours of each day. Which is fine for refuelling from the pump, considering an electric car will need a recharge after just a few hours use there is simply not capacity to run them for the required time.

kairoo November 18, 2009 5:49 PM

London is a 'capitol'; 'capital' is what taxpayers give poor City of London bankers.

so the news is essentially BMW offered more dough than Nissan. er, that's life, get over it.

what you really should be questioning is why a bankrupt country with experience of billion-pound fiascos like the Dome thought having a £15 billion pound bean-feast for Lord Coe and his mates was such a fantastic idea.

Pol Medhi November 18, 2009 5:50 PM

Considering the usage the best could have been hybrids which sadly BMW doesn't make yet. How about specially commissioned BMW tricycles?    

Zeddy November 18, 2009 7:04 PM

Given the Olympic symbol, I think Audi missed a trick here.

#money talks...#

The Colonel November 18, 2009 8:34 PM

"As Autocar reports, 2012 sources actively dismissed the idea of using electric vehicles as unreliable and unproven.

Really? I drive (sic) the LEAF prototype last month and it was hugely impressive."

Blimey!  If only you'd have told the "2012 sources" that, maybe they'd have changed their mind.

This is about sponsorship, that is cash, not legacy or innovation.

Also, it's got nothing to do with emotive nonsense about "making decisions that affect the future of the capital".  If Boris Johnson wanted to pally up with Nissan and EDF to set up a Renault/EDF backed charging network I'm sure he could, Olympics or no.  EDF wouldn't take much persuading if there is much money to be made (it's pretty much going to be down to them to make it happen in any case).

Kairoo, check your dictionary my friend.

Evo_ermine November 18, 2009 9:09 PM

Yes, Kairoo, you are wrong about capital/capitol.

Fred Dagg November 18, 2009 11:31 PM

Kairoo - "what you really should be questioning is why a bankrupt country with experience of billion-pound fiascos like the Dome thought having a £15 billion pound bean-feast for Lord Coe and his mates was such a fantastic idea."

Exactly. It's a damned scandal. The UK Taxpayer will be paying for this for generations.

Old Toad November 19, 2009 5:50 AM

The cars are a side issue really as I suspect with politicians involved the whole Olympic stadium/ village et al will not be finished on time and will go massively over budget just like the dome.

I am saddenned by the fact that the cars supplied will not be manufactured in the UK.

ShvsIrns November 19, 2009 8:20 AM

"And with the use of three-phase charging points, the re-charge time would have been just a couple of hours."

Would have been just a couple of hours??You gotta be joking, are you for real? Are people going to put up with this inconvenience?? Until they come up with a strategy/technology to surmount this impracticality, change batteries/whatever fossil fuel with reign supreme. Burn those fossil fuels ..

Straff November 19, 2009 9:20 AM

Although I'm not supporting the Bankers (there's a reason it rhymes with another word) I find it bewildering that Fred Goodwin gets torn a new ass yet the people responsible for this outrageous scandal (1.5 billion estimate to 10 billion cost???)  seem to be lauded by Politicians. Oh sorry, I've just answered my own question.

Ian1961 November 19, 2009 12:28 PM

The mayor has said that BMW did come in "with the lowest carbon footprint". He has repeated this twice. Do Nissan, or yourself, have a come back?

jammy_rex November 19, 2009 1:59 PM

Slightly ironic that BMW are now seemingly flying the flag for Britain, having killed off the last remaining British mass procucing car maker in MG/Rover!

The Apprentice November 19, 2009 2:44 PM

BMW turned off Rover's life support machine but the honour for the fatal blow I played a small part in as a loyal servant of British Aerospace. BAe took the sickly mongrel under its raincoat to try and hide it as a favour to the government - in exchange for a blind eye turned to highly profitable arms dealing smoothed along with a bit of politics and a healthy dose of corruption. Oh and the government giving BAe hundreds of millions just to make some new toys. They even tried to flog a few of the old dogs by selling at huge discount to employees, friends...anyone who knows you!

Didn't work - most of us, as weapons designers knew enough about impact damage to ever step inside the Dignitas clinic on wheels known as the Metro.  BAe's sophisticated solution to the undesirable car was to not invest any money in Rover at all, comically it was thought that the government had some how seen BAe turning Rover into Britains answer to Saab. How we laughed.

Anyway  I digress. Real reason for BMW's? How about this scenario. Taxpayers buy 4000 BMW's, athletes get driven for couple of weeks in BMWs. Virtually new BMWs gets sold to officials very cheap. Officials happy as officials didn't want battery operated Nissan Notes, wanted shiny posh German car.

Vidge 123 November 19, 2009 4:47 PM

Old Toad "I am saddenned by the fact that the cars supplied will not be manufactured in the UK."

Wrong, every MINI envolved will be built in Oxford, and every 4 cylinder engine (i would have thought that will be most of them, if they are going for the CO2 argument) will be built in hams hall!!

go_coop November 20, 2009 9:19 PM

Load of cr**.

BMW has killed off Rover because Rover was neither good or profitable, whereas MINI makes as twice as much Rover did in the 90's so please stop crying about it...As if anyone would buy Rovers in the first place.

And BMW is currently the leader in CO2 reducing so I cannot see a reason why they shouldn't be a sponsor.

torquespeak November 23, 2009 1:29 PM

Oh my god, this is totally a perception problem.

*knock knock*

Mega City car

That is all.

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 8.2.12

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>