Wed
Jul 29 2009

The future looks bright for Volvo with Stephen Odell

Steve Cropley
One day after he joined the board of Volvo from Ford last October, Stephen Odell, president and chief executive of Volvo, sacked 25 percent of the workforce.

Everyone, even the unions, knew it was coming – and necessary – because demand for Volvos was on the floor, especially in the US where they usually sell best. The company’s costs were simply too high for survival.



Odell could have hidden behind his newness in the job, but he faced the cameras and gave it to them straight, the way he has always done in a varied career full of similarly tough calls.
 
“The US market collapsed as I arrived,” he says. “I don’t think it was due to me. But it was still reassuring to get a call from Alan Mulally, my chief at Ford, reminding me that I wasn’t the problem, but part of the solution.”

Then came more sticky medicine, pay cuts for management as well as daily-paid, and Volvo posted a stonking $255 million first quarter loss – an amount, Odell archly points out, which is only one-seventh of Mercedes' reverse for the same period.
 
Ten months in, Odell has come to be admired in Sweden for his straightforwardness, his simplification of the management structure, and his determination to conquer.

Most people reckon he's the right leader. “Of course it’s still tough,” he says, “but the likelihood is we’ll recover. We have good product in the pipeline: revisions to C30 and C70 at the Frankfurt next month, and further developments with electric cars. We’ve got new S60 and V70 models to launch next year, and before that, we’ve got a communications project I'm really proud of – it's a bit like Mazda’s “zoom-zoom” thing - aimed at Volvo cool, not cold."
 
Odell, who is leaving the minutiae of the Volvo sale to others while he runs the company, almost relishes the battles ahead. Right now, he's arm-wrestling the Flanders government over loan funds it has promised to but not paid (sound familiar?).

He admits Volvo's sales for 2009 will struggle to beat 320,000 units, disastrously short of 2007’s booming 470,000, well behind ‘08’s 370,000 and barely half the 600,000 previous CEOs have publicised as realistic.

Even in the trenches, with his tin hat on, Odell doesn’t completely dismiss such pie-in-the-sky figures. “In a recovered market, around 2012, our sales ought to be usefully north of 400,000,” he predicts. “But if we could eventually get to 600,000 at the right margins, that would be fantastic.”

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Steve Cropley

Road tester of 39 years and columnist of 20, Steve says he’s as much in love with cars today as he was on day one. “And not just the cars, but also the industry that makes ’em.”

Comments

Timberwolf July 29, 2009 10:11 AM

I think that over the past decade, and particularly in the past couple of years, Volvo have got both interior and exterior style nailed for an "alternative" brand.  As long as Odell realises they're not going to sit alongside the German premium triumvirate and doesn't try to ruin the cars with excessive bling and sporting pretensions then I think they've got a solid future.

What I think they need to do, at least here, is concentrate on some UK-specific chassis development.  If only to stop the endless stream of otherwise positive reviews that come to a so-so conclusion thanks to harsh-riding suspension.  They also need to make sure that actual quality/durability matches perceived quality and the company image - just ask Mercedes how much damage getting this wrong over a prolonged period of time can do!

streaky July 29, 2009 11:46 AM

I agree with Timberwolf about Volvo's chassis development.  It has always been a mystery to me why they messed up so badly on this while using Ford parts, platforms and presumably knowhow.  Yet when Richard Parry-Jones was around, he seemed to ignore Volvo!

SDR July 29, 2009 12:11 PM

Agree with Timberwolf regarding the need to deliver REAL - not just 'perceived' - quality.  Strength and quality of engineering is central to the way Volvo is perceived in the marketplace, and should be one of its key differentiators from the 'mainstream'.  

Volvophile July 29, 2009 7:38 PM

I blame Volvo's former CEO for them ending up where they are - Fredrik Arp.  He had no enthusiasm for the company and just didn't seem interested in the whole ethos of Volvo at all.  I also feel that too much went wrong at Volvo Cars under his tenure for it to be a coincidence.  They went from previously achieving record sales to sales falling through the floor in a very short period of time.

Stephen Odell seems vastly better and I think he's a much safer bet for the company's future.  His job should be made a lot easier as well with a lot of promising future models that are in the pipeline.

Dave Stew July 31, 2009 3:27 PM

Volvos are very much 'Marmite' cars - I love my V70 T5, but you can guess the depth of ridicule I face from BMW/Audi driving friends (except when they have a trip planned to Ikea, then they want to borrow it!)

I think Stephen Odell should major on the Scandinavian design and harsh climate build quality ethics that were used to good effect in the 80s and 90s.

I think they missed a trick with the new V70 though - too much like the old one, and where's the T5 gone?

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 8.2.12

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>