Mon
Jun 01 2009

GM: a positive future, a memorable past

Steve Cropley
The twin demises of GM, last year as the world’s biggest car company and a now as a viable financial entity, is encouraging plenty of people to attempt to discredit the US giant as a car-builder. We’ve already heard many ‘industry experts’ (as well as predictable platoons of news media know-nothings) criticising the giant company for not building cars the public wanted.

This is a gross oversimplification of the situation. One disastrous factor, above all, brought GM low. It was a series of decisions, made 50 years ago for the most benevolent reasons, to provide existing and retired employees with benefits the company has not been able to afford for at least a decade. As departed chairman Rick Wagoner memorably put it, GM is a company with 300,000 employees, which is responsible for the pensions and medical bills of 1.1 million people.



The truth about GM’s car-makers, both the pared-down American concern and the newly-devolved bits on this side of the Atlantic - is that they have already designed and are well advanced with producing many of the cars that will be needed for tomorrow’s market. The US company’s new financial freedom, afforded by this Chapter 11 bankruptcy, will allow the company to build cars on a similar cost basis to the US-based Japanese for the first time in decades.

Meanwhile, great GM cars from the pre-bankruptcy era must never be forgotten. Just because market conditions have changed is no reason to forget some of its glorious muscle cars, leader of which (for me) was the Pontiac GTO of the late ’60s. Follow that, if you like, with the original mid-’50s Chevy Corvette, a car so brilliant in concept (leave alone the fabulous styling) that survives today as part of ‘America’s Sports Car’ and will undoubtedly endure. Rivalling those, in my mind, is the new Chevy Volt (first production versions next year) that will excite with its great styling, versatility and the radical answer to tomorrow’s transportation problems.



This side of the Pond? Looking back in history, I always reckoned the Opel GT was a minor miracle. Among concepts, the one that sticks out is a much-displayed city car called Maxx, which inspired many imitators outside GM Europe. And if you press me on today’s product, I think they’ve scored a king-hit with the much-admired Insignia executive, for which hard-headed German execs have started trading BMWs and Mercs. GM is adopting the same enhanced-style-with-refinement philosophy for the Astra, which we’ll see soon, so that car should sell strongly, too. To my eye, at least, GM knows what cars it needs and is getting on with building them.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Steve Cropley

Road tester of 35 years and columnist of 15, Steve says he’s as much in love with cars today as he was on day one. “And not just the cars, but also the industry that makes ’em.”

Comments

redline7000 June 1, 2009 1:27 PM

Thanks to GM for 20 years of good , reliable , well made rear wheel drive cars , i.e. Carlton , Omegas (imo a high water mark in saloon car design) and now a Monaro which hopefully should be fun for a good while yet . And they seem to be the only car manufacturer on the planet whose door mirrors actually look like part of the car and not some hideous add on

AndyRAC June 1, 2009 2:05 PM

Where is the modern day version of the Manta? A fantastic car, especially the Manta 400. RWD, that's a proper car!!

scrap June 1, 2009 2:07 PM

The healthcare and benefits issue is a huge one, that affects all American industry.

But that doesn't excuse GM's many failings - principally, failing to get the product right.

In attempting to defend their reputation, Steve, you have come up with a handful of models over the past 40 years... does that not tell you something?? GM, America and Europe, has been a complacent mess for far too long, and has spurned far too many opportunities to sort itself out. Now it's in crisis mode, and it's a crisis partly of their own making.

As for the Insignia, one question - would you put your own hard-earned money into one?

MarkusMorelli June 1, 2009 2:13 PM

Driven GM cars for 5 years - 5 years of misery.

Straff June 1, 2009 3:37 PM

I think complacency is right.

I'm fortunate enough to own a gorgeous 1958 Cadillac Coupe fitted with the usual assortment of electrical items. New, it was around $5000 when a Rolls Royce cost $11000 in the States. If you've got a few minutes to spare, Google 1957 Cadillac Eldorado Brougham. Look at the specification! Electric memory seats, air suspension, four speed auto etc. etc. GM built them at a loss of $10k (deliberately...!) and they sold for $13500 back then. So what's my point? Simple; if they'd continued their rate of development back then we'd all be running round in bloody hover cars or similar today. It's a sad, sad day.

Uncle Mellow June 1, 2009 4:03 PM

I remember reading in Autocar several years ago that GM had given up trying to compete with imports on car manufacture and was relying on the SUV market to keep it afloat in the US. In view of the way the world is changing - high oil prices and green tendencies - it was inevitable it would sink sooner or later.

Straff June 1, 2009 4:20 PM

You're wrong Uncle Mellow. Look what's happened now that petrol prices have come down - SUV sales are back on the up over there. The American market demands SUV's and Pickups and GM (Chevrolet and GMC combined) are the biggest seller in the US.

jonfortwo June 1, 2009 4:31 PM

Straff, no sensible business would build there strategy based on something as volatile as oil prices. Everyone knows that fuel prices will ultimately rise, except perhaps GM.

Straff June 1, 2009 4:56 PM

Ok, so what you're saying is that Car Manufacturers should all be building electric cars right now? Oil's running out; stands to reason. They’re a lot more expensive but, hey, that’s what we SHOULD be building so let’s do it and stop selling these highly profitable cars because it’s the right thing to do. I'm sorry - you sell what's saleable at the time and try to keep development going on in the background meantime. Look at Toyota's losses; no-one is immune to this downturn. I don't think many laymen consider just how much money a Company as big as GM needs on a day by day basis to keep Operating; those numbers are colossal and a virtual stop on car sales that we’ve seen means that you very quickly get into trouble. Try cutting your wages in half and see how long you can last.

TegTypeR June 1, 2009 5:18 PM

Has anyone actually done the figures for GM with out the pensions liability?  This would give a rough idea if it was the company or the product that is at fault for the corperations demise.

jackjflash June 1, 2009 7:24 PM

"Has anyone actually done the figures for GM with out the pensions liability?  This would give a rough idea if it was the company or the product that is at fault for the corperations demise."

I think we are about to find out, they have no excuse if they screw up this second chance.

hondaboy91 June 1, 2009 7:45 PM

I read an Economist article last year that suggested that GM's pensions and medical liabilities added around 3,500USD to the price of each car they sold. Hence to compete with the unburdened japanese makers, they had to reduce their margins on each car sold, or risk selling no cars because they were overpriced. The first thing to suffer in such a situation is R+D, which is why many of their cars in the US are pretty much the same as they have been since the mid-nineties. This is also why selling SUVs, which their large margins and high ticket price, seemed like a good idea. I have no doubt that, now that they're in chapter 11, GM will once again be able to compete. However, as Ford is still operating with these financial burdens, unlike its major domestic competitors, it is a strong possibility that it, too, will be forced into chapter 11.

jackjflash June 1, 2009 8:36 PM

Ford will be OK; they dumped Jag, LR, and Aston while they were still worth something and put some cash away for a rainy day. Their product line up is pretty good right now.

Peter Cavellini June 2, 2009 11:08 AM

Yes i agree its sad that a great company has gone bust and that lots of of people will lose their jobs,but don't you think there are to many types of car?,do we really need "niche" cars?.The car industry needs to look at what needs to be built,for instance why not just keep developing proven cars,Porsche does it,so do BMW,VW, FORD even.A final question,and i hope it might get some feedback for you,how many types of car WOULD we really need in todays modern world??

Uncle Mellow June 2, 2009 7:44 PM

I find the lack of "niche" cars these days a real problem. I've had the same car for five years ( no big deal ) but there's nothing out there that I would realistically replace it with. All the mid-size " family " cars are getting big and bloated and heavy and too tall and wide for my taste. The Celica is gone, VW don't make a proper coupe , the Integra is gone , Mazdas MX3 and MX6 are gone , as are their coupe-shaped saloons. The Prelude is gone . The Puma is gone . We are left with lots of very tall hatchbacks ( practical but NOT desirable ) and obese saloons.  

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 17-3

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>