Feature11 April 2013

The Mini Paceman JCW packs a 215bhp 1.6-litre turbocharged engine and four-wheel drive. But at nearly £30,000, it is priced identically to the brilliant BMW M135i. The question is, can the Mini's go-kart handling justify its price tag?

Join the debate


12 April 2013

Two of the ugliest cars on sale. I don't want either of those hideous heaps of junk.

12 April 2013

Apart from the similarity in price, if the Mini is really that bad I can't see why this comparison was done.

12 April 2013

Unless you need 4WD I suppose.

I know if I had £30,000 to spare I would already have an M135i.

It may not be stunning but it is certainly no "hideous heap of junk".


12 April 2013

I really can't see why people would cross shop these two. I mean... Would anyone choose the Mini, ever?

Also, +1 on the M135 not being a heap of junk. It isn't pretty, but it's a hell of a good car.


Please insert paragraps where needed.

12 April 2013

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. My next car. 135m thank you. Can't wait until November after watching this. Going to be a looooong summer.

12 April 2013

Steve said the only advantage in choosing the Mini was fuel economy. Surely it has better traction in low grip conditions, too? Not much of a benefit really, but one worth mentioning. The Mini is a super-niche product whilst the BMW has more widespread appeal, I feel. BMW for me too.

12 April 2013

M135i is such a fantastic car, best in class by a mile.

12 April 2013

I know BMW are just responding to customer demand from yummy mummies and faddy daddies, but I don't think these large MINIs work. They should develop a range of interesting Triumph sports saloons for the smaller MINI owners to trade up to.

Unfortunately, the Countryman sells so well that I don't think BMW will abandon this approach anytime soon.

12 April 2013

Good grief, that Paceman is UGLY! The front of the 135i is nothing to write home about but that's the only real downside, the rest of the car so well sorted and priced.

I guess the basis for the comparison is price and parent company but it's interesting nonetheless. Does this prove MINI's margins are so much higher than BMW's at this price point?

12 April 2013

Look are subjective - fair enough.  However, with regard to these two vehicles, it really is funny that many people who buy them (and other BMWs) are hoping to impress - particularly the 1 series (God knows why), and yet do not seem to realise that the vast majority of people find these two vehicles simply horrendous, and offensive to their eyes. LOL!!  Secondly, it has to be asked: What the heck were BMW doing when they initially saw these designs, and said "Yeah... people are really going to like these"!! 


Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka
  •  Maserati Ghibli Diesel
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    Maserati releases another range of updates for its range best seller, the Ghibli. We've driven the diesel version, but there's little improvement on before
  • Tipo Front
    First Drive
    21 September 2016
    New Fiat Tipo offers impressive space and practicality for a reasonable price. We try the 1.6 diesel on the demanding roads of North Wales
  • Seat Ateca 1.4 TSI 150
    First Drive
    20 September 2016
    The Seat Ateca 1.4 TSI 150 makes perfect sense: it's spacious, tidy to drive for an SUV and cheap to run

Latest videos