• i-MiEV Evolution is Mitsubishi's first factory entry into the Pikes Peak hill climb
  • Suspension is via double wishbones
  • No doors mean you have to get in feet first through the window
  • Front splitter helps the car to produce ground effect and a negative lift coefficient
  • This is the smaller of two spoilers designed for the car
  • The only thing behind the rear axle line is the diffuser
  • Headroom is unusually generous for a closed-cockpit race car, legroom, however, is severely limited
  • Instrument binnacle is lifted straight from the production i-MiEV
  • Power socket for the on-board lithium-ion batteries
  • Key and starter buttons sit next to switches for three cooling fans
  • Pads attached to the side of the cabin are handy for resting your knee on during cornering
  • The i-MiEV is supercar quick to 60mph
  • Acceleration above 60mph is blunted by the car's single gear ratio
  • Electric motor's power delivery made the i-MiEV's handling characteristics difficult to predict
  • Grip limits are high and the i-MiEV responds keenly when pushed hard
  • Wieldy and responsive, the Mitsubishi i-MiEV Evolution is the best hillclimb car in the world, probably

If you want to make a racing car immune to altitude sickness, electric motors – which rely on air for cooling only – are the perfect place to start.

Mitsubishi Motors started with three of them, all mechanically identical to the one you’ll find in the production i-MiEV EV. One mounts in the nose, driving the front wheels, while the other two are squeezed into the space behind the cabin and drive the rears.

Matt Saunders

Deputy road test editor
Colour, trim and wheel choices are very limited. For touring use, you might want to develop your own Perspex windscreen and hand-operated wiper

Given a software refresh from their conservative production tune, each one spins to a maximum 11,000rpm and produces a peak 107bhp and 148lb ft of torque. They drive through reduction gearing of approximately 7:1.

The layout gives the i-MiEV Evo a default one-third/two-thirds torque split between the front and rear axles, which MMC considers ideal for a racing all-wheel-driver. But the rear motors are connected in parallel and drive a conventional mechanical limited-slip diff. MMC engineers admit that an independent motor for each rear wheel would have brought big benefits on asymmetrical torque vectoring, but they simply didn’t have time to develop such a system. Not for the car’s debut season, at any rate.

The power for those motors comes, via the same high-voltage power management inverters used on the standard i-MiEV, from 96 pairs of lithium ion battery cells housed on either side of the cockpit, in overgrown side pods, which provide 35kWh of stored direct current.

They also account for a third of the weight of the entire car, so housing them inside the wheelbase, low to the ground, gives the i-MiEV Evolution a very low centre of gravity and a perfect 50/50 weight distribution.

The body of the car is a high-strength steel spaceframe – with a roof but no windows – on which panels of carbonfibre-reinforced plastic are fixed. Suspension is by double wishbones at both ends and consists of fully adjustable coil-overs.

Mitsubishi wouldn’t permit us to weigh the i-MiEV Evo. But the scrutineering form for the Pikes Peak records a figure, complete with driver Hiroshi Masuoka – who must account for little more than 60kg – of 1400kg exactly. Not as light as it looks, then. But considering the content, not a figure to be sniffed at, either.

Find an Autocar car review

Explore the Mitsubishi range

Driven this week

  • First Drive
    22 December 2014
    Entry-level diesel MPV shares its three-cylinder engine with Mini but, due to long gearing, lacks the authoritative punch of a convincing premium product
  • Car review
    17 December 2014
    The replacement for the CL grand tourer has some big boots to fill
  • Mercedes-Benz CLS 350 AMG Line Shooting Brake review
    First Drive
    16 December 2014
    Elegant, alluring and with some welcome improvements, but not good enough to lead the class
  • First Drive
    15 December 2014
    Hushed, flexible and remarkable value for money. Arguably more fit-for-purpose than any other ‘S’.
  • 2015 Mazda CX-3 review
    First Drive
    12 December 2014
    The Mazda CX-3 has style and substance, and deserves consideration for anyone wanting a compact urban SUV. Here’s hoping Mazda gets the price and equipment right