Karma model is 'self-financing' while forthcoming Nina may not need government loans

Fisker Automotive boss Henrik Fisker has dismissed reports claiming the company is in financial trouble following a loan dispute with the US Department of Energy (DoE).

Speaking to Autocar, Fisker said his company could be “financially self-sufficient” if it were to settle to just selling its first model, the Karma. It has secured a $529 million DoE loan to help finance its next model, the BMW 5-series-sized Project Nina, but Fisker has been unable to access anymore than $198m of this money so far after the DoE claimed the start-up had missedtargets.

Fisker insiders claim the company is being used as “a political football” in election year in the US, with DoE loans now under great scrutiny from opposing Republicans after one recipient of DoE loans, solar panel maker Solyndra, went bust.

Fisker has used the DoE money to recommission the former General Motors plant in Delaware to build Nina, and fund the car’s engineering, design and development to an advanced stage ahead of a planned autumn 2013 launch. Nina’s funding delay has forced Fisker to lay off 26 workers in Delaware.

Speaking at the launch of the Karma in Los Angeles, Fisker said: “We’re viable as a business just selling the Karma. We’re delivering around 25 Karmas a day and have had more than $100m come into the company since December.

“But while we want to grow, we don’t need extra models to become viable. We already are. We’re still negotiating with the DoE, but we don’t need its money to fund Nina. We have other options and we’re not in a hurry. Karma is done and financed and we need to make the right business decisions for Nina.

“We will pay the DoE back as soon we can. It’s sad to see bloggers come up with theories as to our demise. We don’t want to talk politics.”

Mark Tisshaw

Join the debate

Comments
1

4 April 2016

It is good to know that they have a stable financial standing and does not require additional loans from the government to execute subsequent business operations. Their patience in setting up a proper timeline in their car releases strategy most certainly plays an important role that influences current their unwavering business position. Their way of operating their business should be made as an exemplary example to fellow competitors in the market.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • 2016 Audi A3 Sportback e-tron UK review
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    First UK drive finds the facelifted A3 Sportback e-tron remains a first-rate plug-in hybrid that is packed with tech if a little short on driver appeal
  • Citroen C11.2 Puretech 82 Furio
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    Citroën's city car gets a new sporty-looking trim level, adding visual adornments, but no premium for the 1.2-litre Puretech triple we're driving
  • Mercedes C350e Sport
    First Drive
    28 September 2016
    Petrol-electric C-Class is a surprisingly well-priced alternative to a diesel but not the greatest example of the new ‘PHEV’ breed
  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka