Mercedes-Benz boss says Maybach SUV based on the next-generation GLS is a 'good idea'
21 April 2015

Mercedes-Benz appears set to join Bentley, Rolls-Royce, Maserati and Land Rover in the super-luxury SUV segment with a Maybach-branded version of the next generation GLS model.

At the Geneva show in March, Dieter Zetsche, Head of Mercedes-Benz cars, told Autocar that it was ‘a good idea’ as a next move for the new Mercedes-Maybach sub-brand and now sales and marketing chief Ola Kallenius, saying the Maybach brand ‘probably could go beyond’ the existing Maybach and Pullman models and that a GLS-based Maybach ‘could be interesting for the future.’ He confirmed that basing the car on the next generation GLS which is due to be seen as early as 2017 would be ‘the more likely scenario.’

In reality, such a car would be a perfect fit for Mercedes which is enjoying unprecedented demand for its SUVs. While there might be some image-damaging credibility issues if a Maybach were to be created from the existing GL class (soon to be facelifted and re-branded GLS), the next generation GLS will be derived from the same platform that underpins the current S-class and therefore a much more suitable basis from which to carry the fight to its rivals.

Expect the car to focus entirely on luxury rather than sportiness because Mercedes is keen to maintain brand separation between its Maybach and AMG sub-brands. The car is likely to be powered by the same 6-litre, twin turbo V12 found in both the current Mercedes-Maybach and the last standalone Maybach model launched in 2002. It is possible a slightly less profligate model featuring Mercedes’ new 4-litre V8 twin turbo engine could be fitted, particularly to avoid heavy taxation in China. A diesel version is unlikely, however, because the car would undoubtedly be focused primarily on the Chinese and American markets where diesel remains of little interest.

At the other end of Mercedes’ SUV aspirations lies the tantalising possibility of a Smart SUV or crossover based on the shared Forfour/Renault Twingo architecture. The car is appealing not just because of the popularity of the SUV format, but also because it would give both Mercedes and Renault another purpose for a platform that otherwise and by modern standards might seem rather under-utilised. There is also the issue of at last turning Smart into the long term profit making brand it always promised to be, and a small, cute crossover might take some very large strides towards making that a reality.

Zetsche says there are issues engineering such a car because of its highly unorthodox but space-efficient rear engine/rear drive configuration but that ‘if we were to go for any expansion for the Smart family, the SUV segment would be the one to look into.’ 

Get the latest car news, reviews and galleries from Autocar direct to your inbox every week. Enter your email address below:

Join the debate

Comments
4

22 April 2015

A small city SUV from smart would be a good idea. As long as it isn't done like a Cross Up!, which is just a jacked up Up!, then it could be the first proper city SUV. Smaller than the likes of the Juke, but more appealing than a Panda 4x4.

22 April 2015
superstevie wrote:

A small city SUV from smart would be a good idea. As long as it isn't done like a Cross Up!, which is just a jacked up Up!, then it could be the first proper city SUV. Smaller than the likes of the Juke, but more appealing than a Panda 4x4.

If they offered it in a 3-door version then it might interest me. With all this niche filling going on its frustrating for me that no-one seems to offer a higher riding, compact 3-door vehicle, something akin to a smaller version of the original Rav4. But, no doubt it will end up as 5-door only, with the short doors making it look rather frumpy.

22 April 2015

I see your point Catnip, but it won't sell in big enough numbers to justify the extra engineering and tooling. I'd love for them to do a 3 door version of the forfour as well as.

23 April 2015

You're probably right, but the current thinking on 3-door models from some manufacturers confuses me. Surely a 3-door Polo will sell more than say a 3-door Seat Leon? Yet the Leon has only been recently introduced, and VW are going to drop the 3-door Polo. Similarly, You see loads of the last model Clio in 3-door form, yet Renault doesn't do any small 3-door cars at all now.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • 2016 Audi A3 Sportback e-tron UK review
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    First UK drive finds the facelifted A3 Sportback e-tron remains a first-rate plug-in hybrid that is packed with tech if a little short on driver appeal
  • Citroen C11.2 Puretech 82 Furio
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    Citroën's city car gets a new sporty-looking trim level, adding visual adornments, but no premium for the 1.2-litre Puretech triple we're driving
  • Mercedes C350e Sport
    First Drive
    28 September 2016
    Petrol-electric C-Class is a surprisingly well-priced alternative to a diesel but not the greatest example of the new ‘PHEV’ breed
  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka