From £19,0907
Larger, more spacious Golf majors on practicality, but a lack of driver involvement leaves it second behind Ford's C-Max

Our Verdict

Volkswagen Golf SV

New 'Sportsvan' replaces the Volkswagen Golf Plus and offers a sound blend of polished practicality and ease of use

What is it?

The Volkswagen Golf SV, VW's replacement for the Golf Plus and a new model which we praised when we drove it on the continent earlier this year. Now it's a chance for this compact MPV to prove itself on British asphalt.

Transplanting the regular Golf's looks onto the SV, which stands for Sportsvan, has been successful, but the overall design remains conservative. That said, the SV appears practical from the outset; at 4338mm, it's only 83mm longer than the regular Mk7 Golf, but that extra length has been put to good use inside. 

The boot comes with 500 litres of storage space with the back bench in place – compared to the regular car's 380 litres – and with the rear seats folded forwards a maximum load area of 1520 litres can be liberated. By comparison, the Golf SV's key rival, Ford's versatile C-Max, offers 471 litres with the rear seats up and 1723 litres with them down.

We tested an SE-specification model equipped with a 108bhp 1.6-litre TDI powerplant.

Our mid-spec model came with adaptive cruise control, folding tray tables, a trip computer, automatic headlights and wipers and VW's Driver Profile Selection system to the already well-equipped entry-level specification. That's all for £22,585, but the metallic paint added to our test car – the sole box ticked on the options list – took the total cost to £23,120.

What's it like?

Rather practical, if not as engaging as we'd like on the road.

Starting inside, the Golf SV is well packaged throughout. Most of the surfaces you're likely to touch are clad in soft-touch plastics or leather trim. It's a premium environment, with only a few cheaper touches like the air conditioning cluster reminding you of what could be unlocked had you upgraded to climate control, a £410 option.

The SV's seats are supportive, and most drivers should have no trouble finding a comfortable position. There's also plenty of space, both in the front and on the rear bench, with masses of legroom and headroom. 

While the SV is well deserving of being called practical, it's not done with the same clever touches as the C-Max. Some of the rear stowage, including the door bins and the pockets on the back of the front seats, isn't big enough to hold anything substantial. While the rear bench can be moved forward and back for extra space, the awkward middle seat can't be completely stowed away like it can in the Ford. 

To drive, the 1.6-litre TDI is competent, though feels slightly out of breath getting up to motorway speeds. That's likely not helped by this engine coming with a five-speed manual transmission, the gearchange action of which felt stiff in our test car.

It still provides smooth changes, but at cruising speed – at around 2000rpm – we yearned for the six-speed manual or seven-speed DSG transmissions found elsewhere in the range. There's noticeable wind noise from around the A-pillar and wing mirrors.

It's a credit to Volkswagen that, elsewhere, the SV feels very similar to the standard Golf on the road. There's the same composed handling, accurate and well weighted steering and very little body roll through corners, a package which should make covering long journeys a breeze.

The Driver Profile Selection system – which offers a choice of Eco, Normal or Sport driving modes, plus an option to configure your own – seems somewhat unnecessary in the Golf SV, although there are benefits to be had through using it. Throttle response is improved in Sport mode, while Eco can result in a notable improvement in fuel economy.

Even without Eco mode activated, and on a fairly spirited test drive, we averaged around 50mpg, although that's some way short of the claimed 72.4mpg Volkswagen quotes for this Golf SV variant.

Should I buy one?

One of the challenges the SV faces is that it exists alongside some seriously impressive competition, and keener drivers will likely be swayed by the C-Max's added driver involvement and flexibility.

Still, the SV remains an accomplished compact MPV, and its conservative looks might appeal to some. It's relatively economical, spacious, well-equipped and comfortable, and a good choice for those in need of a larger, more practical Golf.

Volkswagen Golf SV SE 1.6 TDI

Price £23,120; 0-62mph 11.3sec; Top speed 119mph; Economy 72.4mpg; CO2 101g/km; Kerb weight 1420kg; Engine 1598cc, four-cylinder, turbocharged, diesel; Power 108bhp at 3200-4000rpm; Torque 184lb ft at 1500-3000rpm; Gearbox 5-spd manual

Join the debate

Comments
8

29 July 2014
There's nothing wrong with this bloated Golf except its asking price. Forget the steering or driving involvement - VW can never match Ford in hatchback not to mention this mini-MPV thingy - asking £23G for a 5-speed manual transmission with this unrefined and under powered diesel engine is nothing short of daylight robbery.

29 July 2014
"...but a lack of driver involvement leaves it second behind Ford's C-Max" - it shouldn't all come down to 'driver involvement'; it's an MPV!

29 July 2014
Should have said not just driver involvement, also, a saving of over £2000 (£2500 with Current £500 cashback) when compared with a 1.6 tdi c-max Titanium with 6 Speed box rather than the 5 on Golf

 

Hydrogen cars just went POP

29 July 2014
There is nothing appealing about this car. Nothing.

30 July 2014
They've missed a trick. Their stablemate skoda has the Octavia which will fit 3 full sets of golf clubs and trolleys. This so called GOLF sports van does not have the width to put golf clubs in the boot. If only they had created more space behind the wheel arches.

30 July 2014
Don't VW still sell the Touran?

30 July 2014
Citroen C4 Picasso or Golf SV? A thoroughly modern and clever interpretation of a small mpv or a dull, taller-bodied hatchback that looks like it's coming to the end of its lifecycle? Whilst the Golf might edge it in build quality, there will be nothing to separate them on the reliability front. Does car design get any more nondescript than this?

30 July 2014
3 months ago I got a new Golf 2.0 Tdi 150 SE 5 door manual and paid about 21k after haggling but think the list was saying around £22500. I know this is a bit taller etc but I don't know why you would buy this over mine where you have the punchier engine, still with strong economy, six rather than 5 gears, stronger residuals etc...unless that extra bit of space (and the regular hatch doesnt feel particularly cramped at all) is essential? I would have thought this 1.6Tdi SE would come in around £20,500... this is too expensive as it stands! I wonder how much the 2.0Tdi is!.....

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Skoda-Karoq 2.0 TDI 4x4
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Diesel version of Skoda’s junior SUV is unobtrusive and undemanding, but we’d still go for the silkier petrol version of the Karoq
  • Audi Q7 e-tron
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Expensive and flawed but this understated diesel-electric Audi Q7 has a lot to offer
  • Citroën C3
    First Drive
    16 October 2017
    Is the third gen Citroën C3 ‘fresh and different’ enough to take on its supermini rivals? We spend six months with one to find out
  • BMW X3
    First Drive
    15 October 2017
    A satisfying rework of the X3 that usefully improves its handling, cabin finish, space and connectivity to make this BMW a class front-runner again
  • Vauxhall Insignia Country Tourer
    First Drive
    13 October 2017
    Off-road estate is now bigger, more spacious and available with torque-vectoring all-wheel drive, but is it enough to make its German rivals anxious?