Wed
Sep 09 2009

MP4-12C: subtle can still be brilliant

John McIlroy
So McLaren has at last launched its long-awaited MP4-12C, the unofficial successor to the legendary F1 (let’s forget about the McMerc SLR, shall we?). And I’ll wager that critics will be swift to blast it for being generic (there is a touch of F430 and 360 Modena about the front, after all) and, well, bland.

But I reckon they’re mistaken.



McLaren MP4-12C - exclusive details, photos and videos

Okay, I’ll admit that the MP4-12C is perhaps a little less striking than Ferrari’s forthcoming 458, or even the Lamborghini Gallardo. But the boys from Woking have simply applied the same theory to this car’s design as the one they used for the F1, so they’ve resisted the temptation to slap aerodynamic appendages and ridiculous curves everywhere.

I think this is the right thing to do because, even 11 years after it ceased production, the F1 still looks terrific. And that’s primarily because it was created without the sort of trendy visual gimmicks that tend to age all designs. If the MP4-12C grows old half as gracefully as the F1, then I think Frank Stephenson’s styling work will be vindicated.

What’s more, I think the cabin’s great (it feels superbly focused on the driver’s needs when you sit in the hot seat) and I’ve got a sneaky suspicion that the engineering will be first- rate.

Let’s hope so, because the supercar market is all the better when Ferrari and Lamborghini are looking nervously over their shoulders.

Technorati Tags:

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About John McIlroy

Used to report on the WRC for Autosport magazine; jumped to Autocar in '05. Career high? Driving McRae's Ford Focus WRC. Career low? Crashing McRae's Ford Focus WRC.

Comments

Lanehogger September 9, 2009 7:14 AM

I like the look of the car, and i'm sure it'll be very good if not brilliant. But you can sense from Autocar's car comments, and its defense of its styling, that the McLaren will be class leading and untouchable.

Does Autocar feel then that the R8, 911, Gallardo, 458, Vantage etc are all overstyled, have spoliers everywhere and are tasteless and overstated?

ShvsIrns September 9, 2009 7:30 AM

"ridiculous curves"? huh?? What's wrong with curves? I like the hips on my one thanks!

Splash n Dash September 9, 2009 12:26 PM

Amazing to read that all of sudden every other car is overstyled just because McLaren forgot to do so.

ShvsIrns September 9, 2009 1:23 PM

hahaha .. well said onya for being brave enough, I will too! You know what it's like, when a British car maker goofs in some aspect the AAT, the Autocar Apologist Team, comes out in force lol ... look at the reaction to the XJ styling debacle ...  "Don't judge the new Jaguar XJ too soon" .. oh puhleez! What a disaster! The overall profile and proportions are a nice rip off from a certain Italian stylehouse, and the details ... um .. at least the back is different! The lower nose looks terribly unfinished, and the less that can be said about those side intakes the better .. overall, not too passe even if rather derivative, and to quote someone else on here it "smacks just a smidge of a refined kit car", though definitely a step above a Noble creation ... if only the outer was half as good as the promised technical spec ... and the Italians looking nervously over their shoulder? Oh come on John, they already HAVE a reputation as creators of excellent, original, stylish, accomplished, road cars.

Orangewheels September 9, 2009 2:58 PM

I'd agree about Autocar apologists here - we have several blogs telling us how the fact that it's dull and dated looking inside and out is a good thing. Sorry, it's not and never will be.

It's got the look and feel of a late 90's  / early 00's supercar, and is a clone of the old Ascari. It's 5 yrs behind the game rather than ahead of it, like the 458 Italia.

It will not age further because it looks dated from the start, like a Rover 75 or Jag X-Type. Real classic design looked cutting edge from day 1 - the F1 didn't look conservative or old when launched, neither did true classics like the E-Type.

I'll also put my money on the fact that the Autocar stance will gradually change over the coming months -  first drive will mention 'slightly debatable' looks and by the time we get to a full road test looks will be acknowledged by the Autocar writer to be 'rather dated.'

Funnily enough Autocar did exactly the same thing with the old Jaguar XJ - supported the conservative looks at launch and towed the manufacturer line that they were a good thing, questioned them shortly afterwards at the first drive and by the time the car is a few years old every major magazine will rip the car to pieces because of the looks only to forgive it because the ride and handling are magical.

The main question is are Autocar staffers being kind due to the privileged access that they were given to the car months before launch or because they are concerned about upsetting Mclaren and not getting one to test drive? Why not just be honest and say you don't like it -  you will get far more credit from your readers who prize your supposed unbiased opinion.

Is there an Autocar staffer among you who will be brave enough to come out and say they think it looks dull and dated? (which is I'd guess what you're all thinking as you're not that far removed from the rest of us) Hilton maybe? - one of the few with the Kahunas to be a little more honest with their readers?

Fletcher52 September 9, 2009 5:39 PM

What I appreciate about the design of the MP4 -12C is how they have managed to successfully reinvent the mid 90's Nissan 300ZX for the 21st century.

Orangewheels September 10, 2009 2:54 PM

Looks like writers at other magazines are a little braver about their thoughts of the styling than the lilly-livered lot at Autocar:

'With the striking new Ferrari 458 Italia due, it can’t afford to disappoint. But the styling is disappointingly bland. I think McLaren missed an opportunity to create something really distinctive. What a shame ex-Ferrari man Frank Stephenson was only involved after the design had pretty much been finalised' - Chris Chilton, assistant editor CAR Magazine

'Let's be blunt – a lot of supercars in this price bracket are purchased by people more concerned with their car's looks and less with the intricacies of its development and construction. The McLaren’s default looks are its biggest drawback. It’s looks generic and lacks true character. Sure, those ticks on the side are a clever hat-tip to the McLaren logo, but to most people they are just air intakes. The front end is bland and that black grinning intake looks rather Kia-esque... I wish it had the looks that reflected the engineering passion and unwavering integrity that I know has been lavished on it.'

Ben Whitworth, contributing editor CAR Magazine

'It's a shame it looks quite generic, when the McLaren F1 managed to look so different in its day. That's not necessarily the McLaren's fault – back in 1993 when the F1 was launched, it looked totally different to the bloated Diablo and Testarossas of the day, with their pop-up lights and fussy detailing. Ferrari and Lamborghini both followed McLaren's lead in creating cars that look minimalist and tightly packaged - look at the unfussy lines of the Gallardo and brutal functionality of the F430. In today's environment the 12C looks pretty and it looks fast, but it doesn't move the game on. I haven't seen either in the flesh yet, but I reckon – visually at least – the 458 Italia might blow it away. Mark Walton, editor-at-large CAR Magazine

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 17-3

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>