Subtle looks, far from subtle performance

Our Verdict

Mercedes-AMG S 63
The Mercedes S 63 AMG costs nearly £120,000

Never before has supercar performance and opulent luxury blended so seamlessly

15 June 2009

What is it?

Mercedes Benz’s performance division, AMG, has had a bit of a tinker with its S-class flagship. The changes are mainly cosmetic, with a redesigned, more aggressively beaked grille, LED daytime driving lights unique to AMG, tail-light LEDs arranged in a double C pattern and a body-coloured rear diffuser. There are also gorgeous new 19-inch multi-spoke wheels, but overall, the big S retains a fairly subtle profile.

What’s it like?

Slightly less subtle is the monster performance on offer. The S 63 retains the previous version’s 6.2-litre V8, which gives the two-tonne Merc the necessary poke to reach 62mph in just 4.6 seconds.

Compared to its more refined, genteel S 65 V12 sibling, the S 63 is the swaggering hoodie of the family. AMG boss Volker Mornhinweg describes it as “more sporty, more raw, more loud.” Well, that’s a pretty eloquent description: get hard on the throttle and that V8 transmogrifies a fairly subdued low-speed woofle into a hard-edged, hammering wail as the needle swings to the 7200rpm rev limit. Shifting through that ultra smooth (and quick) seven-speed automatic with the requisite flappy paddles, the S 63’s straightline performance remains titanic.

Which brings us neatly to the new S 63’s most significant dynamic upgrade. Asking a two-tonne lump of steel to go around a corner with anything approaching poise and agility is inevitably a losing battle with physics. However, AMG has invested the S 63 with the amusingly named Torque Vectoring Brake. This brakes the appropriate inner rear wheel during cornering to help the car turn in with more conviction. But while the big S does corner with a reassuring degree of plantedness and security, there’s always that point when you think ‘ah yes. Two tonnes.’

Other fresh mechanical tweaks include a crosswind stabilisation function based on the car’s Active Body Control – sorry, couldn’t find a crosswind to test this one – and a variable ratio steering set up, which felt very natural with first-rate feedback.

Should I buy one

The S 63 is all you’d expect of an S-class – funereal quiet when you’re not playing silly buggers with the throttle, and enough standard equipment to (almost) justify the circa £98,000 price tag.

Gavin Conway

Join the debate

Comments
9

15 June 2009

[quote Autocar]There are also gorgeous new 19-inch multi-spoke wheels[/quote] Are you having a laugh?

15 June 2009

Its like Autocar have so little to say that they feel they must say at least X -- kind of like when your a kid, you have your first job, your just hanging about and the boss comes in and you turn around quickly and get back to your area; showing your working sooooo hard.

Boy except for Sutters (who I think actually cares a bit) I have no respect for the journalism here. But where else to go? J

15 June 2009

'Flappy paddles'? Is that a technical term?

15 June 2009

I'll take the S320 CDI for half the money :-)

With 98k, I'd buy a used Rolls Royce...

15 June 2009

There are more flashy LED's on this than a new Q7!

15 June 2009

One day in the not too distant future this car will be in the corner of an industrial museum, bearing the inscription; 'The last of the gas-guzzlers'.

The Germans are starting to look like they're running out of ideas. Hardly a day goes by without a BM, Merc, or Audi with upwards of 500Hp being launched. To the extent that it doesn't impress me any more. weird - never thought i'd find 500hp boring..

15 June 2009

I'm not keen on any daylight running lights period.

but I'm sure the engine isn't boring , I run a cl 63 amg and am very happy with it.

16 June 2009

[quote NiallOswald]'Flappy paddles'? Is that a technical term? [/quote] No I believe its a "Clarksonism" I think he was the first journalist to use the term and its become used industry wide now to describe them, it will probably end up in the next edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. I am more concerned with this line, - The S 63 is all you’d expect of an S-class – funereal quiet when you’re not playing silly buggers with the throttle. Should you really be playing silly buggers with a £100k car? This car was designed to go down autobahns at speed, not to be thrown around test tracks playing silly buggers, I would suggest that anyone who has the money and the inclination to buy this car probably has something else to play silly buggers in.

18 June 2009

I realize it is a matter of taste but the spindly wheel design clashes with the car's lines and design theme. Are AMG trying to mimick Alpina?

I do love the noise the exhausts make, though!

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka
  •  Maserati Ghibli Diesel
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    Maserati releases another range of updates for its range best seller, the Ghibli. We've driven the diesel version, but there's little improvement on before
  • Tipo Front
    First Drive
    21 September 2016
    New Fiat Tipo offers impressive space and practicality for a reasonable price. We try the 1.6 diesel on the demanding roads of North Wales
  • Seat Ateca 1.4 TSI 150
    First Drive
    20 September 2016
    The Seat Ateca 1.4 TSI 150 makes perfect sense: it's spacious, tidy to drive for an SUV and cheap to run