Tue
Jul 27 2010

Audi A7 explained

Ed Keohane
As the crowd waited for the unveiling on the new Audi A7 last night in Munich, our attention was momentarily captured by its red-trousered chief designer, Stefan Sielaff, as he positioned lengths of black tape on a large, hanging white board.



The important thing, he explained, was that there were only three lengths of tape: you have to be able to capture the essence of a car in just three lines.

And that’s exactly what he did. It’s not so much that you couldn’t see these lines already - you could because they were pencilled on the board - but it emphasised them in a slightly neater way than, say, going over them with a large black marker, Rolf Harris-style.



What was particularly striking, as you can see from the picture here, where he's put just two lines on, is how the slight divergence between in the two lines across the door - the swage line and the waist line - adds a sense of dynamism to the shape. It somehow superimposes a wedge-shaped purposeful poise on the car.

I’ve only seen the A7 indoors, where the major lines are all but hidden by the glare of the camera flashes and spotlights, but I’ll be interested to see whether you really get the effect in the open air, where the car will spend its time.

See what you think, by watching our 360-degree video of the Audi A7, filmed at the launch in Munich.

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Ed Keohane

Says his job description should be shown at the Smithsonian as one of the longest documents in the English language. Likes small cars and simple 4x4s that he can mend himself.

Comments

Liam F July 27, 2010 4:27 PM

The question you have to ask, is: would you buy a car from a man with cherry trousers?

Ed Keohane July 27, 2010 4:44 PM

I think the dealers - notoriously cautious in sartorial matters - are sticking with black. :-)

HiltonH July 27, 2010 5:02 PM

Germans are notorious anglophiles. Aristocratic Red/Orange trousers can still be bought at Hackett and other old-school stores on Jermyn Street in St James', London.

I myself have a pair of red moleskins but they're far too small these days. The double breasted blazer still fits though....

dutchmaestro July 27, 2010 5:12 PM

The question you have to ask, is: would you buy a car from a man with cherry trousers?

you must eat Tescos' pleb-line radiated cherries. them trousers are Ferrari scarlet.

@Hilton, Herr Sielaff looks like a nautical man which may explain the boat-style wood interior of the car.

dutchmaestro July 27, 2010 5:21 PM

On a serious note, Ed, contrast this launch, moderated I believe by some elegant German TV/actress person, wth the car's designers playing a starring role, with the Hollywood-style razzmatazz of the XJ's launch 12 months ago, with 'special flown-in A-listers', Jay Leno and Elle 'The Body' MacPherson.

Who needs chatshow hosts and ageing glamourpusses when you've got Stefan, his black tape and his scarlet trousers? Bet he was the talk of München last night  - with the Ladies.

HiltonH July 27, 2010 5:25 PM

Dutch

Yeah, I can see that.

Sielaff is a contemporary of mine (though he's design royalty because he went to the Royal College of Art) and all that generation seem obsessed by Riva boats. They've been cited as the influence behind the Rangey 3, the Rolls cabrio and now, probably, the A7 interior.

rosstopher July 27, 2010 5:44 PM

Terrible car, great trousers.

Cheltenhamshire July 27, 2010 6:16 PM

Ed, Hilton .... did he explain why he and his German rivals think consumers now want to spend north of €50,000 on ugly hatchback versions of perfectly decent saloons??  Was is a) Consumer tastes have changed and they now accept that Rover was right 30 years ago with the SD1 and subsequent 800 Fastback, but we make them properly and as such their time is now or b) Rich people will buy anything these days if it has the right badge and all my talk about sticky tape and daft trousers is just BS because we have to pay lip service to 'credible' design and engineering no matter how cynical our niche within a niche marketing really is?

Danii 123 July 27, 2010 7:10 PM

Audi says that it is to completely update and extend its range rapidly to offer cars in virtually every segment. However, before they announced this , the range consisted of a hatchback, family saloon, sporty saloon,luxury saloon, small roadster and an SUV. In adddition to the range now on offer, is a smaller SUV, a larger roadster, a smaller hatchback, saloon with a coupe style roof line and rear end and soon a larger version of that!! All they are doing is introducing pointless modles that already exist within the range that are without a doubt going to snatch sales off one another. Some such as the A1 and R8 are important, but why dont they spend their money on creating a large and luxury MPV or extend the limited availibility of different A3s by creating an avant version. They should also scrap their legendary but rediculously pointless fast estates.  Audi is the significant luxury car maker in the VW group, so why dosent it just stick to what it does best? Rade the VW parts bin and create similar models with an Audi twist. Yes Audis growing independence is popular with many customers but honestly would VW really approve of a large pointless coupe that fits very uneasily into the range and delivers nothing differnet from other Audis of near identical size that have more rear headroom and a larger boot? Obviously not! so why should anyone else.

dutchmaestro July 27, 2010 7:28 PM

@Chelts,

yes, I'm sure the car's designger spent hours talking about his ugly creation.

let's lighten up, heh? spinning higher-priced cars off a base platform is sensible commercial logic. Mercedes have does it for years with the CLK coupe, priced at E-class levels but built on C-class platform costs. Audi is following suit with the A5 higher-price derivaties off the A4 platform - the A5 coupe/cab. and Sportback, and now the A7, off the new A6, at approx. €10k higher prices vis-a-vis the standard saloon.

The new Merc CLS will probably have similar price hikes compared to the sedan E-class, and so on. In fact, the odd one out is the BMW 5-series GT, with its 7-series underpinnings and interior lounging space at roughly £10-£15k discount to sister 7-series models. I'm sure BMW will make their money back with the 5-series based new 6-series coupe and cab., plus 4-door Gran Coupe later.

The point is surely, a) one man's 'ugly' is another man's 'beautiful', of which there seems ample so far for the A7, to shift the 30-40,000 Audi hope to sell w/wide each year and b) new platforms are so expensive to produce - the A7 is the first VW Group product to use the new longitudinal group platform or 'modular Laengsbaukasten' - that in order to cover costs and turn a profit eventually, you must look for niches to fill, to raise the volume, and lower the piece part cost with suppliers and so on.

Because Audi is part of the largest, or near largest car company in the world it can do these niches. The truth is volume makes or breaks car companies, above cottage-producer level, and VW is now really starting to exploit its 6m unit/yr. plus advantage over Merc, BMW and so on. BMW and Merc have just announced they are designing common seat bases for all their cars, to start driving up combined volumes, to drive down piece part product cost. Volume off a platform or Baukasten is the key to long-run commercial success. Visual appeal is subjective. I like it.

david RS July 27, 2010 7:49 PM

Often ridiculous the discours of the designers...

Sorry for them...

giulivo July 27, 2010 8:20 PM

I agree with Dutchmaestro and disagree with Danii123.

Ed Keohane July 27, 2010 9:56 PM

@Cheltenhamshire I’d go with point A. I’ve always been a big fan of the SD1 and 800 Fastback. To me the interesting thing, comparing them to the A7, is the way the rear of the car is resolved.

The 800 Fastback carries the waist line right across the boot lid to the rear of the car, with the door handles sitting neatly in the middle of the swage line, which ends up in the rear lamp cluster (very much like a modern Mazda on both counts (except the 2?)).

The SD1 has huge rear quarter glasses - those were the days - which allows it keep the line running down from the roof and let the waist line curve up. And, of course, the swage line was a wide channel running across the middle of the doors - where it used to be - adding a useful bit of panel stiffness.

@Dutch Yes, I much prefer going to a launch to find I can hear designers talking about their cars and the decisions they’ve made, though to be fair to Leno he obviously loves (and knows) his cars and that’s a welcome thing on a launch as well. As for Elle, I reckon she’s not so much A-list as DD-list...

Anyone who pines for the SD1, or who’s interested to see what we said when we road-tested it, check this out:

Particularly fine ‘they-don’t-make-them-like-that-any-more’ cornering shot:

www.autocar.co.uk/.../rover-sd1-3500-vitesse.aspx

Road test:

www.autocar.co.uk/.../200119

Cheltenhamshire July 28, 2010 8:36 AM

Ed, isn't it a shame that BL / Rover could not make them properly!  If they had they might still be with us, I remember when they facelifted the 800 and the boot line of the saloon went above that of the bottom of the window ruining the lines, except on the coupe which still does look great.  I am not a huge fan of hatchbacks created from saloons, or saloons created from hatchbacks and to me the A7 just looks a bit odd.  But, much better than the ugly 5GT and the hideous Panamera .... what went wrong with the designers eyes??  Aston Rapide however, the back end of that is superb, neatly concealing the hatchback and keeping the coupe looks perfectly.

RobotBoogie July 28, 2010 8:41 AM

I think when some has to explain why a design is working, then the design generally isn't and the A7 is no exception. It's no dog but it is just another big, bulky German exec car.

disco.stu July 28, 2010 9:10 AM

It's a good-looking car, tight and well-designed, but ultimately lacking in drama.  If you look up the Sportback Concept from last year, which was the basis for this car, it was much more exciting.  Same basic shape but more dramatic in the headlights, mirrors, bumpers and shutlines.  IMO they have toned it down far too much for production.

enda1 July 28, 2010 9:27 AM

People comparing these cars to the SD1 and rover 800 and proclaiming that rover where "right"  seem to forget that Audi arn't new to this game. They had audi 100 (C1) coupe from 1970 and the audi 100 (C2) avant from 1976 (same year as the SD1) which was a hatch back rather than the modern avent estates

The Fop July 28, 2010 9:38 AM

If we're going to bang on about up market hatches, let's not forget Saab who have form in that category...

Cheltenhamshire July 28, 2010 10:36 AM

Enda1, yes that is correct ... but arguably Rover had the image back then that Audi has now .... so whilst they may well have both been launched at the same time it was the Rover getting the headlines.  But isn't it a shame that Audi has not mentioned it's history in the upmarket exec hatch market that it clearly has?  And Fop, Saab indeed has but wasn't it's first hatch the 1985 Saab 900?  I was sure the 99 was a saloon, and the 92 also.  

Pistachio July 28, 2010 11:27 AM

The trouble is that Da'Silva is saying it is a new Niche!!

It isn't a new Niche.

It isnt for Audi either as there was an Audi Avant hatch in the late seventies early eighties want there?

I think it looks too close to the A5 SportbackAvantquattroCoupeHatch thingey anyway. Why bother why not just have a Sedan or a Wagon or a really cool mega coupe.

overboost July 28, 2010 11:39 AM

Interesting to see the reaction in the US where hatchbacks have the same image as diesel-pretty low. Perhaps it will not be sold in the US. Honda released a sedan hatchback to compete with the 5GT and it has been slated in the US press. The French tried with the XM/Renault 25 and sales were abysmal outside France. Niche is wrong? Look at the X6/Q7 sales- marketing over engineering wins....

Pistachio July 28, 2010 12:19 PM

Rover tried selling the SD1 in the states, apart from its quality which was bad and the fact that in the US summer the rear parcel shelves turned to dust and the paint flaked, the American's didn't get it. They are contrary to popular believe a very conservative bunch when it comes to family cars.

Latebreaker July 28, 2010 1:14 PM

In terms of design, I thought it would of gone something like...

1)Take the A8 and make it smaller

2)Take the A6 and make it slighter bigger

3)Make it a hatchback

4)Add a hydraulic spoiler so everyone knows your speeding on the motorway

5)Charge alot of money

Or something like that

jskater July 29, 2010 1:06 AM

There is something akin to an explanation on Sniff P*trol...

saintly78 July 30, 2010 2:29 PM

Another bland pointless Audi...  I can take comfort in the fact that one owner won't be able to buy a private plate beginning with A7 as I've got it... on a Volvo.

40summat July 31, 2010 10:57 PM

ffs

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 8.2.12

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>