Sat
Jun 20 2009

Chasing the Ford Focus RS

Steve Sutcliffe
On paper, and to begin with, sticking a 300bhp Focus RS on the same piece of road as a £15,750 Renault Clio seemed like a complete waste of time. And money. And petrol.

And yet…when we did so, it was anything but.



The Focus, as you probably know, is a sort of four-wheeled equivalent of the second coming. It’s so quick and so composed, it’s already taken care of what is arguably one of the greatest performance cars of the modern era; the Nissan GTR. When we compared the two recently we found the Ford to be more fun, more civilized, half the price and damn near as fast as the GTR in real world conditions – assuming you have some sort of a conscience and aren’t prepared to drive like a lunatic just to make a point.

So the idea of comparing a car that’s good enough to put one over the Nissan GTR with a Renault that has two-thirds the power, well, like I say, to begin with it wasn’t my idea of fun.

Watch the video by clicking here

But the moment I climbed into the little Renault and drove it with vim at a few corners, I knew the RS had competition.  It’s so well balanced and so unfeasibly nimble and agile, you can drive it like an absolute maniac and still get away with your mistakes.

And so we decided, let’s take them to the hill route at Millbrook and see if the Clio – in controlled conditions, with nothing coming the other way – could keep up with the Ford if its driver was sufficiently unhinged.

Road test chief and all-round tasty wheelman Matt Prior drove the RS while muggings here got the keys to the Renault. We agreed that Matt would drive as fast as he could but with all the Ford’s various traction and ESP systems still engaged. I was allowed to turn the traction control off on the Clio, a small but important advantage over the crests and jumps at Millbrook.

Although it became blindingly obvious from the moment we set off that the Clio wasn’t as pokey on the straights or up the hills – of which there are quite a few on the hill route, amazingly – it wasn’t completely destroyed by the Ford in a straight line, either. Which meant that under brakes and through the corners I could, so long as I was prepared to drive like someone with a brain the size of a cumin seed, actually reel the RS back in.

The Clio’s relative lack of weight and its extra agility meant that, if pushed, it could corner harder and stop faster than the Ford. And that was a very big surprise indeed.

When we reached the end and parked up my hands were pretty much welded to the steering wheel, and my heart was about ready to burst. The Renault had got airborne at least twice and gone sideways a lot more than I’d planned. But after three miles it was still nailed to Ford’s back bumper, and the expression on Matt’s face when he climbed out said it all. He looked disgusted, and amused, and confused, all at exactly the same time.

The Clio had blown both of us away. Maybe it wasn’t such a bad idea, after all.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Steve Sutcliffe

Autocar's finest driver and most experienced road tester. Raced TVRs for three years; drove Honda's F1 car and set competitive times at Silverstone. Says he "likes cars, and likes other people who like cars".

Comments

psst June 17, 2009 12:26 PM

Very impressive, but it is always difficult to know how much is the car and how much the driver. It would have been interesting to see the result of swapping drivers to see if Sutcliffe in the Focus left the Clio!

icsunonove June 17, 2009 3:02 PM

Good test. Now is the question: Since the Focus can keep up with the Nissan GT-R on a twisty road. Can the Clio also do that?

beachland2 June 17, 2009 5:18 PM

i dont take these tests too seriously because of the un-controlled and random way they are conducted. any result could be achieved. i remember a real life scenario when a police chase car got out run by a criminal in a 3-wheeler reliant robin on twisty roads. does that make the reliant as the ultimate road weapon? or a serious consideration?

as it happens i would prefer  the clio over the focus, but the GTR  is a proper road warrior and really no ford focus even if it had 500bhp would get anywhere close to it in serious performance ability.

here is another test for auto car, on the same track drive the Bugatti Veyron with an Evo FQ-400 chasing. whats the difference between a £1 million car to a £0.05 million car?

.

jerry99 June 17, 2009 7:49 PM

Is this really such as surprise? A light small car with a well balanced chassis and brakes with a relatively small excess of power over traction is highly likely to be easier to push beyond the limits of its tyres than something heavier with much more power on tyres little bigger.

Unfortunately most buyers prefer to pay more for something apparently endowed with better technology rather than search out that inate balance, which is becoming increasingly hard to find as manufacturers strive to attract those larger wallets. Luckily Renault have know this since they built the 8 Gordini it not before.

Dan McNeil June 17, 2009 8:19 PM

@jerry99

Absolutely.   Plus, the smaller, cheaper, lighter car is a lot more fun.

CUP200 June 17, 2009 8:49 PM

I have just bough a cup200 last week so sill running it in but is is a great little car as they have said the handling is fantastic + very good brembo brakes mine has lighter speedline alloys and recaro seats which are excellent,I would recommend one to any one who just wants to enjoy driving you could relate it to a caterham but just more practical for everyday use.

drivenfromtherearplease June 17, 2009 9:25 PM

Thanks Steve and Matt.

You have now made up my mind(at least for the next few days). My next co car will be the Clio200 Cup. My 182 Cup used to destroy the ego's of so many on the road (in safe conditions) I just love the stealth appeal of certain cars.

My only concern is that the cat is well and truely out of the bag! Thanks mateys I would have rathered you kept it quiet!!!! Now they'll be everywhere!

My weakness is anything decent with rearwheel drive or a light nimble little thing like the Clio cup. My Aygo for eg, was so much fun in the right conditions in the narrow streets of Bristol due to the low weight (for a modern car - until the engineers sort the weight issues, all new cars will be bloaters). My A2 the same. My current BM has such a nice balance and grown up feel and nothing beats that rear driving experience, however lurking deep in me is a mini monster that relishes the character of the Clio.

You get double pleasure from a car that is good, but gives you change in the process, hmm I have saved £10k. What the hell hammer it I will have to really go somewhere to use that much fuel. Ooh talking of which that's a lot of nice holidays/motorsport events that can be attended for £10k!

(Glad it can be ordered in grey with grey wheels to shy away from attention - Alien Green? Steve if you had company that is how your passengers would have looked on that 3 mile circuit!!!)

To follow the thread above:

Smiles per miles?

Can you go wrong with a Panda 100HP or the Twingo 133?

Small ones are more juicy!   :

I once embarassed a driver some years back in a 2.5V6 Vectra SRi.

Travelling back from Robin Hood Airport at 5am in my Wifes unmolested 1.1l Saxo (with steel wheels and plastic wheel trims!!).

I got mullered on a straight bit of road by this V6 thingy with the twin square exhausts.

The road was becoming twisty and hey ho, here comes the Saxo.

The guy could just not shake me and I could see he was trying everything (car squirming etc) - thundered off in the straights and I would see the whites of his eyes in his mirror in the bends.

Lightweight, nimble and a sorted chassis. Loveley.

RednBlue June 17, 2009 9:54 PM

Maybe this story can be seen under a different light. Maybe "the great Focus Rs" is not THAT great. Maybe it's been overrated, especially in the first drives. Maybe.

"Chaving" The Ford Focus Rs. I would rather be seen in a Trabant...

Jah June 18, 2009 12:30 PM

A standard lap time comparison would have been more meaningful.  Also, remember the Nissan GTR and Focus RS comparison was on normal roads and both drivers tried both cars.

jl4069 June 18, 2009 9:11 PM

Steve,

Come come now sir. Get a Grip! Here's what you really said...

"The Renault had got airborne at least twice and gone sideways a lot more than I’d planned"

Now isn't that a better description of what was really going on- a description of the driver handling the car? Is that what your job is really about, describing how the driver interacts with the car and the road- not which car can stay on the others bumper? The handling assessments are what you guys get paid for no? JL

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 17-3

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>