From £43,5539
Sitting between the S and the Turbo in the model range, the Porsche Macan GTS is one of the most entertaining SUVs out there

Our Verdict

Porsche Macan
The new Porsche Macan is offered with a choice of three engines, including a 3.0-litre turbodiesel

New 'junior Cayenne' promises to be the most sporting SUV yet

What is it?

The Porsche Macan GTS is, and we quote its maker, "the Macan for the driving enthusiast". Considering that even the S Diesel provides plenty of pace and enjoyment on a winding road, the GTS could be one of most enjoyable SUVs you can buy.

Like other GTS-badged models in the Porsche stable, it’s not the quickest model in the range – that’s still the Turbo’s job – but it does offer more shove than the S on which it’s based. How much? You get an extra 20bhp and 30Ib ft of torque thanks to a little bit more boost, a revised intake tract and a freer-flowing sports exhaust for the twin-turbocharged V6.

To help slow this near two-tonne SUV, you get the brakes from the Macan Turbo, while handling is improved with standard adaptive dampers including a 15mm ride height reduction. Alternatively, there’s an optional air-sprung set-up that was fitted to our test car.

Of course, there are also plenty of visual clues to show you've spent an extra £10k over a Macan S. These include GTS badging inside and out, gorgeous 20in wheels, black exterior accents and sports seats with Alcantara centres. Time to try it in the UK for the first time.

What's it like?

The Macan may share a platform with the Audi Q5, but it feels like a Porsche through and through from the moment you fire it up. Turbocharging may prevent the V6 from having a truly memorable howl, but the bassy throb at idle certainly sounds purposeful.

Slot the seven-speed dual-clutch ‘box into drive (no manual is offered), and the Macan pulls away smoothly, quickly shuffling to the highest possible ratio. With the V6 spinning slowly, you can’t help but notice how refined the GTS is; potentially a worry considering how focused it’s supposed to be.

Apart from very noticeable tyre roar on the kind of concrete surface that’s so common on the M25, there’s very little to offend your ears. The engine is subdued, wind noise kept to a minimum and there’s no suspension noise, either. Not only are the springy bits quiet, they offer excellent comfort, even over expansion joints and crumbling road surfaces.

After double-checking the bootlid to make sure we had been delivered a GTS, we started to push a little harder. A flex of your right ankle sees the gearbox drop multiple cogs and the engine pause for a moment before the scenery starts to get very blurry. Let’s just say we can happily believe the performance figures Porsche provided.

But, as mentioned, the GTS isn’t the performance figurehead of the range; more important is how it handles. At speed, you notice a bit of float through dips and crests, while throwing it around in Comfort mode shows up some body roll, but certainly not enough to cause any worry.

Thankfully, selecting Sport for the springs dials out the vast majority of the body float and reduces roll, too. Turn in is far crisper and you can feel the chassis working beneath you far more vividly. There is a Sport Plus mode that stiffens things even more should you feel the need.

What’s astonishing is that, unlike cars with other adaptive systems, the Macan remains comfortable even in its sportiest Sport Plus mode. Yes, you do feel a lot more of the road’s surface, but the stiffness of the spring is matched to a perfectly judged damping effect that ensures you’re not pogoing down the road.

Whichever mode you’re in, the inherent balance of the chassis is an absolute joy. The majority of torque goes to the rear axle and it shows. Accelerate out of a bend, and you feel the rear tyres drive you out far harder than the front tyres are pulling.

Decide to turn off the stability control (a delightfully easy process) and the Macan can even be persuaded in to some sideways shenanigans. Thanks to perfectly weighted and decently quick steering, as well as some torque shuffling between the axles, this is easily corrected. It’s certainly something to enjoy rather than fear.

Complaints? We have very few. Although the steering is precise, it isn’t brimming with feedback, the exhaust could sound a bit angrier in its nosiest mode, and the brakes are a bit grabby near the top of their travel. Overall though, it drives spectacularly well considering the lofty body and sizeable mass. It genuinely drives better than most ‘normal’ cars.

Of course, it isn’t just about the driving experience. Like any other Macan, it offers a big, well-shaped boot that can be easily extended by folding the rear seats. Accommodation for those in the back is acceptable, although many rivals offer more head and legroom.

Up front, it’s easy to get comfortable thanks to plenty of adjustment and the superbly supportive driver's sports seat. You also get the latest version of Porsche’s infotainment system. Measuring 7.0in from corner to corner diagonally, it proves clear and responsive, and has the added benefit of Apple CarPlay. It’s a shame that sat-nav is a pricey optional extra, though.

Should I buy one?

Despite the SUV being a terrible place to start when you’re building a performance car, you can’t ignore the on-going popularity of them. As a two-fingered salute to the laws of physics, the Porsche Macan GTS proves hard to beat.

An Audi SQ5 may be a touch more practical and a bit cheaper to run, but the GTS is far more enjoyable on any road you care to point it down. It isn’t cheap and we failed to better 22mpg, but who wants to be sensible all the time anyway?

Porsche Macan GTS

Location West Sussex; On sale Now; Price £55,188; Engine V6, 2997cc, turbocharged, petrol; Power 355bhp at 6000rpm; Torque 369lb ft 1650-4000rpm; Gearbox seven-speed dual-clutch automatic; Kerb weight 1970kg; Top speed 159mph; 0-62mph 5.2sec; Economy 32.1mpg (combined); CO2/tax band 207g/km, 37%; Rivals Audi SQ5; Alpina XD3 

Join the debate

Comments
13

27 July 2016

not very good really for a 3 litre petrol, I used to get 28mpg with a v8 jaguar years ago

29 July 2016

I have to agree with you there.

This car is truly pointless. The SQ5 is just as quick while returning far better figures and the Alpina XD3 would be the choice for those after that driving thrill. 22mpg sounds appalling for a modern day car regardless of it being a V6 petrol, I used to get 19mpg average out of my V10 Audi S8.

29 July 2016

I've always thought the GTS Porsche's look like Mansory versions - and that is not a compliment! Shame you can't get the tech without the bodykit.

 

 

 

31 July 2016
Deputy wrote:

I've always thought the GTS Porsche's look like Mansory versions - and that is not a compliment! Shame you can't get the tech without the bodykit.

Mansory and their ilk are RGA for the financially enhanced.

I'm not entirely sure why there's debate about the Macan's looks. It's a jeep. Folk may as well argue over which is the prettiest breeze block.

I don't need to put my name here, it's on the left

 

29 July 2016

Just when the Macan promises to be a visual improvement on the Cayenne, here comes a messy incoherent multi-layered front end and those awful 3-dimensional rear lights. Porsche used to be a master of understatement, so what's gone wrong?

29 July 2016
abkq wrote:

Just when the Macan promises to be a visual improvement on the Cayenne, here comes a messy incoherent multi-layered front end and those awful 3-dimensional rear lights. Porsche used to be a master of understatement, so what's gone wrong?

Nothing...It's only nostalgic idiots who never bought any of their products in the first place that have an issue with what they do now, and that is to become one the most successful car manufacturers in the world.

29 July 2016
Marc wrote:
abkq wrote:

Just when the Macan promises to be a visual improvement on the Cayenne, here comes a messy incoherent multi-layered front end and those awful 3-dimensional rear lights. Porsche used to be a master of understatement, so what's gone wrong?

Nothing...It's only nostalgic idiots who never bought any of their products in the first place that have an issue with what they do now, and that is to become one the most successful car manufacturers in the world.

Your comments would have carried more weight if you had provided a counter argument -
My problem is this - In order to preserve the Porsche look the headlamps are set very high and almost horizontal, which leaves a cliff face of vertical elevation to fill. The designer does this by adding horizontal bands on either side of the grille to try to break this verticality. But unfortunately these bands look like a random collection. So to me the design is a failure -
As you think this is a success, let's hear your side of the argument. This thread is still open.

29 July 2016
abkq wrote:
Marc wrote:
abkq wrote:

Just when the Macan promises to be a visual improvement on the Cayenne, here comes a messy incoherent multi-layered front end and those awful 3-dimensional rear lights. Porsche used to be a master of understatement, so what's gone wrong?

Nothing...It's only nostalgic idiots who never bought any of their products in the first place that have an issue with what they do now, and that is to become one the most successful car manufacturers in the world.

Your comments would have carried more weight if you had provided a counter argument -
My problem is this - In order to preserve the Porsche look the headlamps are set very high and almost horizontal, which leaves a cliff face of vertical elevation to fill. The designer does this by adding horizontal bands on either side of the grille to try to break this verticality. But unfortunately these bands look like a random collection. So to me the design is a failure -
As you think this is a success, let's hear your side of the argument. This thread is still open.

Do I think it is a success? It's an overweight 4x4 but it does its job, it allows the manufacturer to remain profitable and that allows it to bring to those who want them, what are probably the most capable range of sports cars currently on sale. So yes, regardless of what it looks like it is a success.

29 July 2016
Marc wrote:

Nothing...It's only nostalgic idiots who never bought any of their products in the first place that have an issue with what they do now, and that is to become one the most successful car manufacturers in the world.

I'm a Porsche owner (Boxster, 981 generation) and a big fan of the regular Macan, but agree with abkq that the front of this version is a bit of a mess, with far too much going on. It looks even worse from the side! I don't mind the rear lights, but the badging is way too much, just like on the new "Porsche 718 Boxster S"! The de-badging option is a must have (of have not, if you get my drift). In any event, I don't think abkq was rubbishing the whole Porsche range, just commenting on the design details on this particular model.

29 July 2016

Thank you Autocar for telling us how many mpg you got. Now do you think you could do that every time? it's real not difficult.

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Audi S5 Sportback
    First Drive
    19 January 2017
    The Audi S5 Sportback is more bruising GT than practical sports car, but it makes sense for those wanting a fast executive saloon in coupé get-up
  • First Drive
    18 January 2017
    Despite receiving a cosmetic and mechanical refresh, Lexus's compact executive saloon still fails to provide much driving involvement
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV 5h review
    First Drive
    18 January 2017
    Big-selling plug-in SUV gets a light refresh in the face of new challengers to offer decent economy but only average driving dynamics
  • Mini Countryman Cooper S
    First Drive
    18 January 2017
    All-new bigger Mini continues to make a curious, flawed crossover hatchback, though it’s more compelling to drive than some and more practical than it used to be
  • Porsche Panamera 4 E-Hybrid
    First Drive
    17 January 2017
    Plug-in petrol-electric Panamera makes a better case than ever to supplant the diesel best seller, but it still appeals more to the head than the heart