From £13,220
Taller gearing improves the CO2 output and economy without spoiling the car’s driveability

Our Verdict

SUV, coupé and even motorcycle styling meet in likeable compact crossover
SUV, coupé and even motorcycle styling meet in likeable compact crossover

With its exaggerated styling, the Nissan Juke takes the notion of a crossover in a new direction

12 October 2011

What is it?

Certain versions of the Nissan Juke have received a light tweaking as a result of a manual gearbox switch. The 1.6 petrol and the 1.5 dCi diesel now use a more compact unit rather than their former Nisaan Qashqai-sourced transmission. The result is a set of longer-legged ratios that result in improved official fuel consumption and CO2 emissions but without, says Nissan, blunting acceleration.

See pics of the Nissan Juke in action

What's it like?

So the 1.6 petrol now achieves 47.1mpg combined rather than 44.8mpg and its CO2 emissions fall by 8g/km to 139g/km. Meanwhile, for the diesel sampled here, economy climbs to 57.6mpg from 55.4mpg, and its emissions now sit at 129g/km, which drops it one VED tax band, too.

This torquey, civilised diesel is well able to pull the Juke along at a satisfyingly brisk pace, and according to the trip computer of the virginal example we drove – it came with 1.5 miles on the clock and was therefore a long way from run in – it managed 43mpg on a long drive south. So it must easily be capable of hitting 50mpg if you try.

In other respects the Juke is unchanged. The powertrain impresses, its stiff-legged ride less so, although that does allow it to corner pretty flatly, considering its height-to-width ratio, and it’s a pretty agile device.

Should I buy one?

The appealingly quirky interior forces few compromises inside, although some will find versatility undermined by a rather small boot, and the painted mouldings and the configurable centre console display do a good job of distracting you from the cheapness of some cabin plastics.

But it’s easy to see why the Juke has been a hit, Nissan’s Sunderland plant having now produced 150,000 rather than the 85,000 it had expected at this point.

Nissan Juke 1.5 DCi Acenta Premium

Price: £16,895; Top speed: 109mph; 0-62mph: 11.2sec; Economy: 57.6mpg (combined); CO2: 129g/km; Kerb weight: 1329kg; Engine: 4 cyls, 1461cc, turbodiesel; Power: 109bhp at 4000rpm; Torque: 177lb ft at 1750rpm; Gearbox: 6-spd manual

Join the debate

Comments
9

20 October 2011

Yes that's all very well but I would still like to know what it is like back to back with the previous model.

Does the revised transmission affect it by any significant amount? Are we looking at a car that has been compromised by eco credentials?

 

 

It's all about the twisties........

20 October 2011

Sore head, this morning? You should get out on the "twisties" more!

Seems a fair report for a first drive.

20 October 2011

There are certainly a large number of these on the road in my area, so much so that I hardly notice them any more.

20 October 2011

It is all well and good improving the CO2 figures but the acceleration times can be measured by a sun-dial

21 October 2011

[quote thebaldgit]It is all well and good improving the CO2 figures but the acceleration times can be measured by a sun-dial[/quote]they're better than a 1.4 fiesta's performance figures, comparable or better than a 1.6 Ford or Mini and far better than PSA's 1.4 or 1.6 offerings, so not really seeing the significance of your criticism...

21 October 2011

I wish I could hardly notice them, still can't decide whether to vomit or laugh whenever I see one.

21 October 2011

My money would go on the much cheaper Juke with the 1.6 petrol. It only emits 139g/km and does 47mpg, and the 11 second 0-60 time is fairly respectable too. I probably wouldn't buy myself a Juke anyway, but the 1.6 would be my personal pick of the range.

21 October 2011

[quote philcUK]

[quote thebaldgit]It is all well and good improving the CO2 figures but the acceleration times can be measured by a sun-dial[/quote]they're better than a 1.4 fiesta's performance figures, comparable or better than a 1.6 Ford or Mini and far better than PSA's 1.4 or 1.6 offerings, so not really seeing the significance of your criticism...

[/quote]

Which MINI 1.6 are you comparing to? The similarly priced One has slightly better performance (it is a smaller car after all), but the mpg and particularly emissions are significantly better in the MINI.

31 May 2013

i tested it for a day its average suv.

greetings from logo designer! cheap logos, logo design

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka
  •  Maserati Ghibli Diesel
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    Maserati releases another range of updates for its range best seller, the Ghibli. We've driven the diesel version, but there's little improvement on before
  • Tipo Front
    First Drive
    21 September 2016
    New Fiat Tipo offers impressive space and practicality for a reasonable price. We try the 1.6 diesel on the demanding roads of North Wales
  • Seat Ateca 1.4 TSI 150
    First Drive
    20 September 2016
    The Seat Ateca 1.4 TSI 150 makes perfect sense: it's spacious, tidy to drive for an SUV and cheap to run