From £180,812
Auto 'box is the better option for everyday driving

Our Verdict

Aston Martin DBS
Until the £1m One-77, the Aston Martin DBS was the British marque's halo model

The DBS is Aston Martin’s greatest ever GT

23 October 2008

What is it?

This is a lightly enhanced version of the quite splendid Aston Martin DBS coupe. Here we’re testing the optional Touchtronic 2 (that’s automatic to you and me) transmission.

Also on offer through the revised Aston Martin DBS options list are +2 rear seats in place of the standard little storage bins, lighter 20-inch wheels and - now as standard - a 1000W 10-speaker Bang & Olufsen stereo.

What’s it like?

Still quite splendid, truth be told. Much of the appeal of the manual Aston Martin DBS, which is a bit of a bruiser next to some of its rivals, is it’s old-fashioned charm. Thankfully the automatic version hasn’t compromised any of that appeal.

The gearbox is a six-speed ZF unit, much like the one fitted to the Aston Martin DB9, with a few tweaks: including a lower final drive and recalibrated shifts, more aggressive to suit the DBS’s feisty nature.

It shifts gears very well too. Because it’s a conventional auto, Touchtronic 2 doesn’t have the control and precision of an outstanding automated manual, but its shift times are good and the torque converter lock-up is quick. It’s no slusher: it really fires the gears home.

Should you want it, manual control is by magnesium paddles behind the steering wheel and, although this gearbox robs the driver of the ultimate interaction of a manual shift, gone too is the manual’s sometimes clunky shift, and the V12 engine’s slightly springy, zingy and non-linear throttle response at low revs.

So it’s an easier and, in many ways, more rewarding drivetrain to use.

It lets you concentrate more on the rest of the excellent Aston Martin DBS package: a firm, controlled ride; approachable, surprisingly playful handling with a fine chassis balance; and well-weighted, nicely geared and accurate steering.

The 510bhp V12 makes a wonderful noise and Aston claims that, mated to the six-speed auto, the 0-62mph acceleration time of 4.3sec is unchange; likewise the top speed of 191mph. It certainly feels as quick as the manual.

And the options? You’ll know yourself if you needed the +2 seats and, while the wheels save 8kg overall, the fact that they look brilliant is probably likely why most customers will choose them. The Bang & Olufsen stereo, meanwhile, is a thing of wonder.

Should I buy one?

Absolutely. Big grand tourers that can do the track day and supercar thing are few and far between and the Aston is just about as good as any.

The auto option on the Aston Martin DBS adds three grand and, although a couple of our testers bemoaned the loss of the outright interaction, just as many thought the benefits outweighed that loss.

Put it this way – if you generally drive on great driving roads and track days, take the manual. If you spend an equal amount of time on rubbish roads, take the auto.

Either way, the Aston Martin DBS is a lovely piece of kit. And that Bang & Olufsen stereo is awesome.

Join the debate

Comments
6

23 October 2008

Sounds very nice but "touchtronic" sounds like some magnetic clutch semi-auto from the early 60's. Why not plain auto?

23 October 2008

Cause they have to give their "marketing gurus" something to do during the day mate!

3 April 2009

the thing is about aston martins they dont experiment with things they just get the same shape as a db9 put a couple of vents on it and call it a dbs

6 April 2009

aston should change there marketing tactic instead of dbs touchtronic they shoud try over priced db9 in a skirt with nice touches where we could be bothered a huge sound system to drown out the awesome exhaust note and a modifed 80's auto transmission all for the small price of a three bed semi it won't make me buy one but at least we'll understand what there sellin !

19 April 2009

The looks are on DBS. Performance wise we are getting better as well. But I find that if your going to make another version of the car you need to change it more. It's almost a replica of the DB9. Other than this no improvement needed.

25 April 2009

[quote mattysanderson]he thing is about aston martins they dont experiment with things they just get the same shape as a db9 put a couple of vents on it and call it a dbs[/quote] No all cars do this. The GT-R, the S3, A4 allroad... Aston Martin have changed: The engine, weight, slightly on the style but it does look like the DB9; I think it's because they don't want to ruin the look of their car series. So I disagree.

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • 2016 Audi A3 Sportback e-tron UK review
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    First UK drive finds the facelifted A3 Sportback e-tron remains a first-rate plug-in hybrid that is packed with tech if a little short on driver appeal
  • Citroen C11.2 Puretech 82 Furio
    First Drive
    29 September 2016
    Citroën's city car gets a new sporty-looking trim level, adding visual adornments, but no premium for the 1.2-litre Puretech triple we're driving
  • Mercedes C350e Sport
    First Drive
    28 September 2016
    Petrol-electric C-Class is a surprisingly well-priced alternative to a diesel but not the greatest example of the new ‘PHEV’ breed
  • Car review
    23 September 2016
    Aston kicks off its ‘second century plan’ with an all-new turbo V12 grand tourer
  • Ford Ka+ 1.2 Ti-VCT 85
    First Drive
    22 September 2016
    A rounded, refined and well-sorted bargain supermini – once you’re used to the confusing role redefinition imposed on the once-cheeky Ka