Porsche has embraced the dark side of turbocharging for the 911, but has that dulled its sabre-sharp edge?

There is an awful lot of navel-gazing being done about the new Porsche 911.

Few sections of the car enthusiast community are more prone to such things than Porsche devotees. It’s Weissach’s punishment for making the world’s greatest sport car – on and off, but mostly on – for more than half a century now that any significant change to it will also be regarded as a contentious one.

With the 996 generation of the 911, the cue was water cooling; with the 997, direct fuel injection; with the 991, a lengthened wheelbase and electromechanical power steering. And now, 
with the facelifted 991, it’s those contemptible, new-fangled turbos. How dare they?

The fact remains, though, that whether or not you like the idea of what Porsche has just done under the engine cover of its perennially blooming rear-engined sports car, it has just gone and done it.

The question 
we’re left with is a pretty simple one: is this still 
one of the world’s greatest sports cars? Enter a 
rival that has called such a notion into question a few times on these pages since its launch in 2013 and remains as tempting an alternative to the Porsche in 2016 as you are likely to find: the Jaguar F-Type R Coupé.

Less than £2000 separates the list price of the Jaguar and the Porsche, the 911 in high-output PDK transmission-equipped Carrera S form, which allows these cars to compete fairly and squarely. But on paper, the F-Type has a conspicuously large advantage on not just outright power but also power-to-weight and torque-to-weight ratios, even after the Porsche’s forced-induction makeover. It’s 542bhp facing off against 414bhp here.

There again, 911s have become famous for overhauling such disparities. In fact, the bigger test for the Porsche’s new flat six may be provided by the effusiveness of Jaguar’s supercharged 5.0-litre V8, a telling examination of combustive character that, even the most committed moderniser would admit, has been eaten away in the Porsche’s case by the addition of turbochargers.

But first things first: how do you spot a new turbocharged 911? Porsche’s design changes are predictably subtle. If you’ve clocked the massaged front valance and enlarged cooling ducts (which now have active aerodynamic shutters for on-demand cooling), then give yourself a gold star. I certainly didn’t.

At the rear, the differentiation is slightly easier to spot. There’s a new, more retro-looking air intake screen, a wider pop-up spoiler and new air outlets for the twin intercoolers just aft of the rear wheels. Otherwise, the Porsche’s shape is classic 911: still fairly narrow and cabin-forwards by sporting standards, but nicely compact and curvaceous with it. It’s utterly distinctive, in other words – in spite of the effect of the car’s popularity on our familiarity with it.

An F-Type R Coupé strikes a very stark 
contrast indeed. The Jaguar’s bigger, squarer 
body volumes, greater width and more blistered forms offer less visual subtlety and more muscle. 
It is somehow less prepossessing than the 911 
and at much greater pains to be looked at. The 
long bonnet and fastback rear end pay homage 
to classic sports car design type, whereas the Porsche wilfully disregards it. What we have here are differing routes to the design of equally appealing machines. Two years ago you’d probably have given the Jaguar the edge as a simple object 
of desire, but now – for reasons I can’t quite put 
my finger on – I wouldn’t. Perhaps the 911 just 
ages more gracefully.

Two outstanding driving environments keep the contest close as we start to compare habitability. Although it’s the wider car, the F-Type’s interior may surprise a few people by having the more intimate, cockpit-like feel. Your hips, knees and elbows are in close proximity to the leathery padding of their immediate environs in the Jaguar and the driving position feels more recumbent than the Porsche’s. There’s more luxurious, grand touring ambience to the Jaguar’s cabin, and more styling flourish, too.

But the 911’s cabin isn’t without richness or sense of occasion, its high centre console putting the gear selector at a convenient height. Smooth leathers, solid plastics and attractive decorative trims conjure a lasting impression of quality and understated elegance. Among the material changes brought in with the facelift are a new, smaller-diameter steering wheel (still round, praise be, and feeling great in your hands) and a swish infotainment system with a larger display (which looks and operates much more like a modern smartphone does and is all the easier to use because of it).

And so, on those all-important one-up, scenic-route drives at the weekend, you’d most likely find the Jaguar the more pleasant place to be – just. The 
rest of the time, though, the Porsche’s occasional back seats and greater carrying capacity would make it the much more usable car. What’s more important? You tell me.

Then comes the moment when you start driving these cars back to back and comparing what you find – and the exact opposite of what you’re expecting actually happens. With all of that extra power and torque, you expect the Jaguar to pummel the Porsche on outright performance. Moreover, you expect the F-Type’s big supercharged V8 to drown out any subjective appeal left in the Porsche’s boxer engine. But 
nope – not even close.

Here comes surprise number one: the new 
911 Carrera S is a very fast sports car. That may 
not sound like a huge revelation, but before this car, Porsche had never made a ‘normal’ 911 (one without a Turbo or GT-series badge on its rump) capable of hitting 60mph from rest in less than 4.0sec. This one is, and by no small margin. A full road test on the car is to come, but we can reveal now that, equipped with a PDK transmission, Sport Chrono Plus and launch control, the new Carrera S took a scarcely believable 3.5sec to hit 60mph in our hands. 
It’s quicker than a 996-generation Turbo, then, 
and quicker even than a 997 GT3 RS. Believe it.

The mid-range torque of turbochargers is only one of many factors that explain the car’s big-hitting pace; excellent traction and a quite astoundingly good two-pedal gearbox are two 
of the others. The engine and transmission 
work together brilliantly when you ask for every drop of available acceleration, and while the 
turbos add urgency and flexibility to the power delivery at lower revs, they cost the car relatively little on its high-rev range. So in flat-out mode, 
the Carrera S just feels rapid, quick-shifting and super-keen to gallop on.

For all of its power and bellowing V8 noise, the F-Type R feels much heavier than the 911, and although it goes hard, it’s quite clearly not the match of the Porsche on outright pace, our timing gear clocking it at 4.4sec to 60mph at best. The 911’s thick wave of torque actually makes the Jaguar feel just a little bit peaky, making you wait until 3500rpm for its full portion of twist, whereas the Porsche delivers it below 2000rpm.

At times, traction limits the amount of power you can use in the F-Type. At other times, it’s Jaguar’s eight-speed automatic transmission, which doesn’t have the same shift speed or instinct for the perfect ratio as the Porsche’s seven-speed PDK. Either way, the Jaguar always seems to have a ready-made excuse for not quite keeping up with its German opposition.

You may not think it needs one, of course. What the F-Type R is brilliant at is bowling along at an arm’s length from full speed – at that easily maintained, big-distance-covering, seven-and-a-half-tenths kind of pace that feels brisk but still responsible on the road. As anti-social as it sounds at full throttle, the car’s V8 filters a more measured but still wonderfully sonorous warble into the cabin under part-throttle, with the active exhaust set to ‘naughty’ mode.

For that reason alone, it would make a broader spectrum of journeys feel special than the 911’s six-pot might, being in possession of that little bit more soul.

But that’s not to suggest that the Porsche flat six is humdrum or ordinary – not a bit of it. Even in the face of such bombastic competition, the new twin-turbo 3.0-litre engine retains most of the mechanical charisma for which 911s have become renowned. There’s no doubt that the exhaust note is missing some of the audible detail that long-time owners will be used to. That tappetty, spluttering idle is present but muffled; the fizzing chatter of the 
valve train is less obvious at high revs, too. And yet the powerplant still offers a much greater operating rev range than a directly comparable 
V6, greater mid-range balance and smoothness and – in spite of some barely detectable turbo lag 
at low crank speeds – remarkable responsiveness for a turbocharged engine.

Add to that greater performance and usability, plus the advantage enjoyed by the 911 on ride and handling sophistication over the F-Type, and you’re led inexorably to wonder not how much corruption and compromise turbocharging has already brought to the 911, but instead how much more it could endure and still be as good as untouchable within its niche. Because the Carrera S’s chassis is better than ever. It’s flatter-handling and more composed, retaining just enough compliance for a supple ride but laudable crispness in response to steering inputs and idiosyncratic trailing-throttle handling adjustability for those who go in search of such things. Put simply, it’s brilliant.

The changes made to the facelifted 911’s suspension range from new dampers, anti-roll bars and helper springs to retuned adaptive damping software. What matters here is that, feeling light on its feet, fluent but controlled over bumps and incisive and balanced through corners, the Carrera S is a chastening lesson to Jaguar about how a multi-talented, mature and well-rounded sports car and occasional GT really ought to conduct itself.

Where the Jaguar can feel stiff-legged and abrupt over a choppy surface, working hard to contain its mass and keep its driving wheels 
in assured contact with the road surface, the Porsche has greater compliance, more lateral 
grip and quicker and more precise handling reactions. Lighter, more incisive and more communicative steering makes it keener to turn in, while greater traction also makes it more confidence-inspiring as you accelerate out of corners. In meaningful terms, the Porsche outhandles the Jaguar without breaking much of a sweat and, moreover, has better control of body pitch than any of its predecessors

The F-Type R is a more stable high-speed motorway car, thanks to the bulk of that supercharged V8 engine, and it offers plenty of rear-driven handling adjustability of the sort that you have to drive the Porsche much harder to access. But when push comes to shove and a slippery corner follows a sudden crest and an uneven braking area, you’d just rather be driving the 911 – then, and not only then, frankly.

Porsche 911 Carrera S PDK

Price £88,245; 0-62mph 3.9sec; Top speed 190mph; Economy 36.7mpg; CO2 174g/km; Kerb weight 1460kg; Engine 6 cyls horizontally opposed, 2981cc, twin-turbo, petrol; Power 414bhp at 6500rpm; Torque 369lb ft at 1750-5000rpm; Gearbox 7-spd dual-clutch automatic

Jaguar F-Type R Coupé

Price £86,810; 0-62mph 4.2sec; Top speed 186mph; Economy 26.4mpg; CO2 255g/km; Kerb weight 1650kg; Engine V8, 5000cc, supercharged, petrol; Power 542bhp; Torque 502lb ft; Gearbox 8-spd automatic

Our Verdict

New turbocharged Porsche 911 Carrera S

Can the newly turbocharged 911 shoulder Porsche’s heritage?

Join the debate

Comments
19

23 January 2016

I'd take the Porsche too, though yours was a sloooow Jag. I've seen more than one test with 3.5 seconds to 60 and better than that with the AWD and presumably heavier convertible. The Jag needs to lose 300+lbs.

23 January 2016

Dear Mr Saunders. I am writing to you on behalf of Roadster/Saucerer who are too angry and confused at this time to respond to the clear breach of Autocar policy within your article. They were both ecstatic to read with delight another comparison between a hallowed JLR product and what would obviously end up being a clearly inferior German equivalent. They have once again reveled in the articulate way that you have managed to point out all of the deficiencies of the Sublime JLR product when tested against the non British and therefore substandard pretender only to..... but wait! What is this?? It appears that you have got to the part of the exercise where you make a host of unfathomable excuses for the divine Jag and declare it the winner anyway only to somehow manage to make out that because the Porsche has performed better within a multitude of different parameters that it is in someway better than the car that can only be described as the very best thing on the planet ever!! I mean really, are you for real!!?? They have made it clear that so long as you are prepared to act like an adult about this and amend the article so that it reads as though the Jag is still the winner even though it clearly isn't that they will happily return to spout their nonsense and not be forced to point out to your superiors that you have clearly broken the unwritten rule re always making out that the JLR product is better than it's rival when anyone with half a brain can clearly make out that it probably isn't!! Kind regards

XXXX's intellect just went POP!

23 January 2016
gigglebug wrote:

Dear Mr Saunders. I am writing to you on behalf of Roadster/Saucerer who are too angry and confused at this time to respond to the clear breach of Autocar policy within your article

"On behalf" is required, as both Roadster and Saucerer are currently residing in mental health facilities after finding that another English mag favoured the Ford Mustang over the F-Type in a head to head comparison.
This Autocar verdict is not helping their recovery...

23 January 2016

I'd sell one of my organs to own that 911, an important one at that...

23 January 2016
gigglebug wrote:

Dear Mr Saunders. I am writing to you on behalf of Roadster/Saucerer who are too angry and confused at this time to respond to the clear breach of Autocar policy within your article. They were both ecstatic to read with delight another comparison between a hallowed JLR product and what would obviously end up being a clearly inferior German equivalent. They have once again reveled in the articulate way that you have managed to point out all of the deficiencies of the Sublime JLR product when tested against the non British and therefore substandard pretender only to..... but wait! What is this?? It appears that you have got to the part of the exercise where you make a host of unfathomable excuses for the divine Jag and declare it the winner anyway only to somehow manage to make out that because the Porsche has performed better within a multitude of different parameters that it is in someway better than the car that can only be described as the very best thing on the planet ever!! I mean really, are you for real!!?? They have made it clear that so long as you are prepared to act like an adult about this and amend the article so that it reads as though the Jag is still the winner even though it clearly isn't that they will happily return to spout their nonsense and not be forced to point out to your superiors that you have clearly broken the unwritten rule re always making out that the JLR product is better than it's rival when anyone with half a brain can clearly make out that it probably isn't!! Kind regards

Like your post. But to be fair MS (and fellow Autocar scribes) far more often than not go for JLR cars over the competition, frequently based on subjective considerations than anything else.

I guess every now and then (such as this case) they feel the need to do the opposite to fend off accusations of partiality. I've got a feeling the conclusion reached here by MS was rather tough for him to swallow. :)

23 January 2016

No new 911/Gen II with PDK waltzes out of an OPC at less than £ 100K: fact. These cars are NOT comparative on price other than in pure, impractical theory. I therefore suggest that if you were in the market for a sensibly specced 'S' your friendly Jag salesman will put you in the seat of a AWD 'R' for the same money...

You would still buy the 911 of course for a whole host of sound engineering reasons but I can't think why a Jag-fancier would now bother with a non-AWD 'R' - unless he were buying a used one exclusively for the summer months.

It's now high time - instead of bringing out ever more powerful versions - Jag starts looking hard at improving suspension calibration, a better interior, more options....Otherwise every iteration of the F-type will become an also-ran in every one of its sub-segments.

BertoniBertone

23 January 2016
BertoniBertone wrote:

... Jag starts looking hard at improving suspension calibration, a better interior, more options....

Precisely. Regarding the unappealing interiors of current Jags (XE, XF, F-type) it seems to me that the Jag designers by deliberately not referring to traditional Jag interiors, offer us nothing interesting or desirable in its place. How is a premium company like Jag supposed to sell its cars with such generic interiors to anyone other than petrolheads (or to Saucerer-Roadster)?

23 January 2016
abkq wrote:
BertoniBertone wrote:

... Jag starts looking hard at improving suspension calibration, a better interior, more options....

Precisely. Regarding the unappealing interiors of current Jags (XE, XF, F-type) it seems to me that the Jag designers by deliberately not referring to traditional Jag interiors, offer us nothing interesting or desirable in its place. How is a premium company like Jag supposed to sell its cars with such generic interiors to anyone other than petrolheads (or to Saucerer-Roadster)?

Saucerer/Roadster are still too angry to respond to your ignorance and accusations at this time. As soon as Mr Saunders has corrected his blatant bending of the truth and elevated the Jag to it's rightful position as the supreme example of modern automotive design normal service will be resumed!

XXXX's intellect just went POP!

23 January 2016

I suspect Jag's interior budget is limited but I do get a nagging sense that Jag's 'inferior-interior complex' when compared to, say, Audi is pretty much self-inflicted. They struggle to get the right quality of people, hence all the Germans in key roles that should be filled by Brits.....

BertoniBertone

23 January 2016

Let me translate into normal English. The Jag has a small cabin, smaller than the Porsche. Once I read this line I basically skipped the rest as it was clearly written ass backwards with the (editorial) intent of pumping up that overweight (Kardashian like)design. nuff said

GeToD

 

Pages

Add your comment

Log in or register to post comments

Find an Autocar car review

Driven this week

  • Porsche Panamera 4S Diesel
    First Drive
    23 August 2016
    Its predecessor may have been a bit limp, but the Porsche Panamera 4S Diesel is crushingly rapid and suitably luxurious
  • Car review
    23 August 2016
    Can the best sports coupé of the decade absorb a contentious new engine?
  • Porsche Panamera Turbo
    First Drive
    22 August 2016
    Porsche has striven to make its Panamera even more luxurious this time around, but the four-seater retains the grip and pace to go with its increased refinement
  • Tesla Model S 60D
    First Drive
    22 August 2016
    Updated Tesla Model S gets tweaked styling and a new entry-level 60kWh powertrain. Could this new version be the pick of the range?
  • Car review
    22 August 2016
    New platform, fresh looks and a better cabin raise its game. Is it now a front runner?