Wed
Aug 12 2009

Why the Lotus Evora won

Matt Prior
I'm slightly obsessed with vehicle dynamics at the moment.

The other day I learned that the latest Porsche 911 GT3 has magneto-rheological engine mounts. They're a simple enough idea, but one that's probably a right royal pain in the backside to tune properly. The theory is that they're slack when one wants to dampen noise and vibration (say during stop/start or unhurried gearchanges), yet they're stiffened at the right times so the engine's mass doesn't affect body movements (during hard cornering, acceleration or braking, for example).



Evora is UK's Best Driver's car - full story

Mega sideways picture gallery

Watch the action on video

I've been thinking a bit more about this recently, after a conversation with Matt Becker, Lotus's engineer in charge of the way the Evora drives.

We'd chatted over a pint about a particular car that's happy to be oversteered, but looks and feels a bit clumsy on the way out of a slide. Becker's theory was that the engine was moving in a direction that unsettled the car just at the wrong time.

My understanding is that having been squashed onto its mounts via the lateral g of a corner, the engine was effectively bounced back in the opposite direction as the cornering force lessened, sending a couple of hundred kilos of engine back across the bay – not very far, but enough to unsettle the car's balance. Like having a bad pillion on a motorbike.

“Engine mounts are something we spend quite a lot of time tuning,” admitted Becker. And when you start flinging the Evora around a track, as Autocar did during our Britain's Best Driver's Car feature a few days later, you can feel it.

The Evora's mounts are passive but tuned so finely that you never feel the engine's weight transfer when pushing the car hard. The Evora can be coaxed into and out of its limits of grip incredibly easily. And, for a mid-engined car, it's astonishingly forgiving.

According to Becker's colleague Gavan Kershaw, it makes drivers who, let's say, aren't quite all that - ones who wouldn't dare get an Exige sideways - look surprisingly handy all of a sudden.

There's more to the Evora's benign nature than just the engine mounts , of course. Its steering is nigh-on perfect for an assisted system (hydraulic assistance, and not much of it because of the car's light front end). Its ride is more compliant than one might expect, and there's enough roll so that you know you're pushing the car, but the rate of roll is mellow and it finds its levels gently.

Really, the Evora's brilliance is down to hour upon hour of fine tuning and, crucially, having one bloke in charge who understands all the individual components and is free from petty big-company politics. Not a damper engineer, a tyre engineer, a spring engineer and a steering engineer working with wheel and tyre sizes dictated by the marketing department.

That's why I find it such a fascinating subject. That's how companies still get it so wrong despite having done, possibly only weeks earlier, something so right. That's why Lotus gets called in to sort out, tweak, tune, hone, or just develop other manufacturer's chassis.

And that's why the Evora will be a handling benchmark for years to come.

Sign-in or register to add your comments

About Matt Prior

Runs Autocar's road test desk and an Austin Seven Special. Likes karting, small cars and big bikes. Doesn't keep wicket for England.

Comments

Lanehogger August 12, 2009 1:55 PM

I'm a bit perplexed why the characteristics which led to the Evora being the best driving car didn't lead to it bettering the Cayman in a recent comparison. After all, during that test the Evora effectively had the better chassis and steering - normally some of the top qualities looked for in a sports car. And it was the lack of these qualities that led to the TT coming stone dead last.

Uncle Mellow August 12, 2009 8:55 PM

Why does the GT3 need pansy engine mounts ? As a hard-core 911 variant I would expect the engine to be bolted rigidly to the chassis.

bol August 13, 2009 7:40 AM

Key distinction: best driver's car or best car? It all depends on what you want. If your priorities are livability and fit and finish then you'll probably make a slight compromise on handling and feel. If you couldn't care less about your soft-touch plastics, but want the best possible drive you'll choose something else - probably, maybe.  Or you might just go for a Porsche in the secure knowledge that few people will question your judgement.

Nikonguy August 13, 2009 10:57 AM

I'm not sure the Evora really won.  The GT3 is a lot less dramatic to handle and safer in my opinion.  I know I wouldnt feel comfortable in the Evora.  The GT3 comes from a long line of pedigrees and rightly so.  The GT3 has more grip giving the driver more confidence to push harder.  Tough luck Lotus.

Onehp August 19, 2009 2:17 PM

Nikonguy: indeed, stick with what you find comfortable: the brand. Because from what you write you wouldn't be able to fully appreciate or tell the difference between the handling of either car...

All about Autocar

Newsfeeds

Subscribe to our news with our RSS feeds

Advertise

To advertise with Autocar contact us

Buy our magazines

Discover our titles at themagazineshop.com

Autocar latest issue - cover 8.2.12

NEW ISSUE OUT NOW

FAST, EASY & SECURE
SUBSCRIBE NOW>>